This paper presents work conducted as part of an evaluation of the Ticketing Aggressive Cars and Trucks (TACT) III program of the North Carolina Highway Patrol. The goal of the TACT program is to reduce the contribution of aggressive driving behaviors to crashes involving commercial motor vehicles. In the present study, camera-based detection methods were used to identify the incidence of following too closely within the context of prevailing commercial motor vehicle and passenger vehicle volumes, speeds, and lane position both before and during TACT program enforcement operations. The data suggest that enforcement under the TACT program may have differential effects on the following distances of cars and trucks. An increase in the following distances of commercial motor vehicles was observed in the rightmost lane of an Interstate facility. A slight decrease in the speeds of commercial motor vehicles was also observed during the enforcement period, but no significant changes in speeds or vehicle following times were observed for passenger vehicles. The results indicate that the methodology developed is sensitive and is able to detect changes in driver behavior. It may thus become a potential alternative strategy for evaluation of the TACT program. The use of roadside instrumentation further enables future applications for automated driver feedback, in which following too closely and speed violations may be detected automatically and the information relayed to the driver in an infrastructure-to-vehicle context like that for dynamic speed signs. Automated methods developed as part of this research could also be used for automated enforcement in future applications.
[1]
Brian Harbord,et al.
Variable speed limit enforcement-the M25 controlled motorway pilot scheme
,
1996
.
[2]
Michael A. Regan,et al.
Use of manual speed alerting and cruise control devices by car drivers
,
2007
.
[3]
V. B. Hammett,et al.
Aggressive driving.
,
1970,
Pennsylvania medicine.
[4]
Wendy Wrapson,et al.
Reductions in driver speed using posted feedback of speeding information: social comparison or implied surveillance?
,
2006,
Accident; analysis and prevention.
[5]
F. Dennis Thomas,et al.
Ticketing Aggressive Cars and Trucks in Washington State: High VisibilityEnforcement Applied to Share the Road Safely
,
2006
.
[6]
Mashrur Chowdhury,et al.
Revisiting the Use of Drone Radar to Reduce Speed in Work Zones
,
2007
.
[7]
Marcus A Brewer,et al.
Improving Compliance with Work Zone Speed Limits Effectiveness of Selected Devices
,
2006
.
[8]
Young-Tae Oh,et al.
Effectiveness of Speed-Monitoring Displays in Speed Reduction in School Zones
,
2006
.
[9]
Michael Sivak,et al.
Traffic safety in the U.S.: re-examining major opportunities.
,
2007,
Journal of safety research.
[10]
Wayne A Sarasua,et al.
Development and Evaluation of Speed-Activated Sign to Reduce Speeds in Work Zones
,
2007
.