Fair Proxy Communication: Using Social Robots to Modify the Mechanisms of Implicit Social Cognition

This article introduces a new communicational format called Fair Proxy Communication. Fair Proxy Communication is a specific communicational setting in which a teleoperated robot is used to remove perceptual cues of implicit biases in order to increase the perceived fairness of decision-related communications. The envisaged practical applications of Fair Proxy Communication range from assessment communication (e.g. job interviews at Affirmative Action Employers) to conflict mediation, negotiation and other communication scenarios that require direct dialogue but where decision-making maybe negatively affected by implicit social biases. The theoretical significance of Fair Proxy Communication pertains primarily to the investigation of 'mechanisms' of implicit social cognition in neuropsychology, but this new communicational format also raises many research questions for the fields of organisational psychology, negotiation and conflict research and business ethics. Fair Proxy Communication is currently investigated by an interdisciplinary research team at Aarhus University, Denmark.

[1]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Alternative mechanisms for regulating racial responses according to internal vs external cues. , 2006, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[2]  Stephanie M. Merritt,et al.  Actions Speak Too: Uncovering Possible Implicit and Explicit Discrimination in the Employment Interview Process , 2011 .

[3]  Dan-Olof Rooth,et al.  The role of automatic obesity stereotypes in real hiring discrimination. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  J. Ziegert,et al.  Employment discrimination: the role of implicit attitudes, motivation, and a climate for racial bias. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  G. Cheng,et al.  Embodied artificial agents for understanding human social cognition , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  K. Jehn,et al.  Crooked Conflicts: The Effects of Conflict Asymmetry in Mediation , 2008 .

[7]  Jean Poitras What Makes Parties Trust Mediators , 2009 .

[8]  Johanna Seibt "Integrative Social Robotics" - A New Method Paradigm to Solve the Description Problem And the Regulation Problem? , 2016, Robophilosophy/TRANSOR.

[9]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Gender Stereotypes Are Alive, Well, and Busy Producing Workplace Discrimination , 2008, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[10]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  The simulating social mind: the role of the mirror neuron system and simulation in the social and communicative deficits of autism spectrum disorders. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Johanna Seibt,et al.  Five Principles of Integrative Social Robotics , 2018, Robophilosophy/TRANSOR.

[12]  Shuichi Nishio,et al.  Teleoperated android as an embodied communication medium: A case study with demented elderlies in a care facility , 2012, 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[13]  Alan Borning,et al.  Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems , 2020, The Ethics of Information Technologies.

[14]  D. Amodio,et al.  Proactive Control of Implicit Bias: A Theoretical Model and Implications for Behavior Change , 2018, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Denise Sekaquaptewa,et al.  Stereotypic explanatory bias: Implicit stereotyping as a predictor of discrimination , 2003 .

[16]  J. Jacobsen A Key Global Challenge: Reducing Losses due to Gender Inequality , 2011 .

[17]  G. Metta,et al.  Robots As Intentional Agents: Using Neuroscientific Methods to Make Robots Appear More Social , 2017, Front. Psychol..