The effects of individually personalized computer-based instructional program on solving mathematics problems

This study investigated the effects of an individually personalized computer-based instructional program on the achievement and attitudes regarding mathematics computational problems and word problems of 104 middle school American students. Students were blocked by math entering knowledge based on pre-test scores, then randomly assigned to a personalized or non-personalized version of the computer-based instructional program. A significant two-way interaction (treatment by math entering knowledge) reflected that personalized higher-level math entering knowledge students and non-personalized higher-level math entering knowledge students had similar post-test scores but personalized lower-level math entering knowledge students scored significantly higher on the post-test than non-personalized lower-level math entering knowledge students. Another significant two-way interaction (math entering knowledge by problem type) reflected that students with higher-level math entering knowledge scored considerably higher on the computational problems than on the word problems while students with lower-level math entering knowledge scored significantly higher on the computational problems than on the word problems. Student attitudes were significantly more favorable toward the personalized computer-based instructional program.

[1]  Steven M. Ross,et al.  Personalizing context in teaching mathematical concepts: Teacher-managed and computer-assisted models , 1985 .

[2]  W. Kintsch,et al.  The role of understanding in solving word problems , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Philip Clarkson.  Language comprehension errors: A further investigation , 1991 .

[4]  Aaron Doering,et al.  Integrating Educational Technology Into Teaching , 1996 .

[5]  Kyle L. Peck.  The Design Development and Evaluation of Instructional Software , 1988 .

[6]  J. Kulik,et al.  Effects of Computer-Based Teaching on Secondary School Students. , 1983 .

[7]  Howard J. Sullivan,et al.  Effects of personalized math instruction for Hispanic students , 1991 .

[8]  C. Benbow,et al.  Enhanced problem translation and short-term memory: components of mathematical talent , 1990 .

[9]  Joyce S. Choate.  Successful Mainstreaming: Proven Ways To Detect and Correct Special Needs. , 1993 .

[10]  E. Stern,et al.  What makes certain arithmetic word problems involving the comparison of sets so difficult for children , 1993 .

[11]  Janis M. Hart,et al.  The Effect of Personalized Word Problems , 1996 .

[12]  Steven M. Ross,et al.  A computer-based strategy for personalizing verbal problems in teaching mathematics , 1987 .

[13]  Gary R. Morrison,et al.  The Role of Rewording and Context Personalization in the Solving of Mathematical Word Problems. , 1991 .

[14]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Toward a design theory of problem solving , 2000 .

[15]  Kenneth M. Williams,et al.  Writing about the Problem-Solving Process To Improve Problem-Solving Performance. , 2003 .

[16]  H. Sullivan,et al.  Student performance and attitudes using personalized mathematics instruction , 2002 .

[17]  Sandra P. Marshall,et al.  Schemas in Problem Solving , 1995 .

[18]  Howard J. Sullivan,et al.  Effect of personalization of instructional context on the achievement and attitudes of hispanic students , 1992 .

[19]  James N. Herndon.  Learner interests, achievement, and continuing motivation in instruction , 1987 .

[20]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Memory for algebra story problems. , 1982 .

[21]  A. Bernardo,et al.  Overcoming Obstacles to Understanding and Solving Word Problems in Mathematics , 1999 .

[22]  S. Ross,et al.  Adapting the Thematic Context of Mathematical Problems to Student Interests: Individualized versus Group-Based Strategies. , 1986 .

[23]  Padma G. Anand,et al.  Using computer-assisted instruction to personalize arithmetic materials for elementary school children , 1987 .

[24]  W Kintsch,et al.  Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. , 1985, Psychological review.

[25]  Steven M. Ross,et al.  Increasing the Meaningfulness of Quantitative Material by Adapting Context to Student Background. , 1983 .

[26]  H. Sullivan,et al.  Personalization of mathematics word problems in Taiwan , 2000 .

[27]  R. Mayer.  Aids to text comprehension , 1984 .

[28]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.