An Efficient , General-Purpose Technique to Identify Storm Cells in Geospatial Images

Abstract Existing techniques for identifying, associating, and tracking storms rely on heuristics and are not transferrable between different types of geospatial images. Yet, with the multitude of remote sensing instruments and the number of channels and data types increasing, it is necessary to develop a principled and generally applicable technique. In this paper, an efficient, sequential, morphological technique called the watershed transform is adapted and extended so that it can be used for identifying storms. The parameters available in the technique and the effects of these parameters are also explained. The method is demonstrated on different types of geospatial radar and satellite images. Pointers are provided on the effective choice of parameters to handle the resolutions, data quality constraints, and dynamic ranges found in observational datasets.

[1]  Richard A. Brown,et al.  Introduction to random signals and applied kalman filtering (3rd ed , 2012 .

[2]  Travis M. Smith,et al.  An Automated Technique to Quality Control Radar Reflectivity Data , 2007 .

[3]  Paul M. Tag,et al.  An AVHRR Multiple Cloud-Type Classification Package , 2000 .

[4]  Serge Beucher,et al.  Use of watersheds in contour detection , 1979 .

[5]  Michael John Dixon.  Automated Storm Identification, Tracking and Forecasting: a Radar-Based Method. , 1994 .

[6]  Robert M. Rabin,et al.  Multiscale storm identification and forecast , 2003 .

[7]  Arthur Witt,et al.  The Storm Cell Identification and Tracking Algorithm: An Enhanced WSR-88D Algorithm , 1998 .

[8]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Synchronization of Multiple Radar Observations in 3-D Radar Mosaic , 2006 .

[9]  Jos B. T. M. Roerdink,et al.  The Watershed Transform: Definitions, Algorithms and Parallelization Strategies , 2000, Fundam. Informaticae.

[10]  Ian Witten,et al.  Data Mining , 2000 .

[11]  Luc Vincent,et al.  Watersheds in Digital Spaces: An Efficient Algorithm Based on Immersion Simulations , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  M. Dixon,et al.  TITAN: Thunderstorm Identification, Tracking, Analysis, and Nowcasting—A Radar-based Methodology , 1993 .

[13]  Valliappa Lakshmanan,et al.  A separable filter for directional smoothing , 2004, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[14]  Arthur Witt,et al.  A Real-Time, Three-Dimensional, Rapidly Updating, Heterogeneous Radar Merger Technique for Reflectivity, Velocity, and Derived Products , 2006 .

[15]  Laurent Najman,et al.  Geodesic Saliency of Watershed Contours and Hierarchical Segmentation , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[16]  Kenneth W. Howard,et al.  Mesoscale Convective Complexes over the United States during 1985 , 1988 .

[17]  T. Başar,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2001 .

[18]  R. Rinehart,et al.  Three-dimensional storm motion detection by conventional weather radar , 1978, Nature.

[19]  Daniel Rosenfeld.  Objective Method for Analysis and Tracking of Convective Cells as Seen by Radar , 1987 .

[20]  S. Beucher,et al.  Watersheds of functions and picture segmentation , 1982, ICASSP.

[21]  Robert Crane,et al.  Automatic Cell Detection and Tracking , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Electronics.

[22]  Anil K. Jain.  Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing , 2018, Control of Color Imaging Systems.