Biomimetic shark skin: design, fabrication and hydrodynamic function

Although the functional properties of shark skin have been of considerable interest to both biologists and engineers because of the complex hydrodynamic effects of surface roughness, no study to date has successfully fabricated a flexible biomimetic shark skin that allows detailed study of hydrodynamic function. We present the first study of the design, fabrication and hydrodynamic testing of a synthetic, flexible, shark skin membrane. A three-dimensional (3D) model of shark skin denticles was constructed using micro-CT imaging of the skin of the shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus). Using 3D printing, thousands of rigid synthetic shark denticles were placed on flexible membranes in a controlled, linear-arrayed pattern. This flexible 3D printed shark skin model was then tested in water using a robotic flapping device that allowed us to either hold the models in a stationary position or move them dynamically at their self-propelled swimming speed. Compared with a smooth control model without denticles, the 3D printed shark skin showed increased swimming speed with reduced energy consumption under certain motion programs. For example, at a heave frequency of 1.5 Hz and an amplitude of ±1 cm, swimming speed increased by 6.6% and the energy cost-of-transport was reduced by 5.9%. In addition, a leading-edge vortex with greater vorticity than the smooth control was generated by the 3D printed shark skin, which may explain the increased swimming speeds. The ability to fabricate synthetic biomimetic shark skin opens up a wide array of possible manipulations of surface roughness parameters, and the ability to examine the hydrodynamic consequences of diverse skin denticle shapes present in different shark species.

[1]  A. Smits,et al.  Scaling the propulsive performance of heaving flexible panels , 2013, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  Iman Borazjani,et al.  The fish tail motion forms an attached leading edge vortex , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  George V Lauder,et al.  Swimming near the substrate: a simple robotic model of stingray locomotion , 2013, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[4]  G. Lauder,et al.  Passive robotic models of propulsion by the bodies and caudal fins of fish. , 2012, Integrative and comparative biology.

[5]  P. Motta,et al.  Scale morphology and flexibility in the shortfin mako Isurus oxyrinchus and the blacktip shark Carcharhinus limbatus , 2012, Journal of morphology.

[6]  Erin L. Blevins,et al.  Rajiform locomotion: three-dimensional kinematics of the pectoral fin surface during swimming in the freshwater stingray Potamotrygon orbignyi , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[7]  W. Meyer,et al.  Basics of skin structure and function in elasmobranchs: a review. , 2012, Journal of fish biology.

[8]  George V Lauder,et al.  The hydrodynamic function of shark skin and two biomimetic applications , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[9]  George V Lauder,et al.  Volumetric imaging of shark tail hydrodynamics reveals a three-dimensional dual-ring vortex wake structure , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  G. Lauder,et al.  Dynamics of freely swimming flexible foils , 2011 .

[11]  Uwe Schulz,et al.  Shark skin inspired riblet structures as aerodynamically optimized high temperature coatings for blades of aeroengines , 2011 .

[12]  J. Castro,et al.  The Sharks of North America , 2011 .

[13]  George V. Lauder,et al.  Robotic Models for Studying Undulatory Locomotion in Fishes , 2011 .

[14]  Amy Lang,et al.  Shark Skin Separation Control Mechanisms , 2011 .

[15]  George V. Lauder,et al.  Swimming hydrodynamics: ten questions and the technical approaches needed to resolve them , 2011 .

[16]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Shark-skin surfaces for fluid-drag reduction in turbulent flow: a review , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[17]  P. Motta,et al.  Bristled shark skin: a microgeometry for boundary layer control? , 2008, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[18]  Deyuan Zhang,et al.  Bio-replicated forming of the biomimetic drag-reducing surfaces in large area based on shark skin , 2008 .

[19]  James Tangorra,et al.  Fish biorobotics: kinematics and hydrodynamics of self-propulsion , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[20]  Franz S. Hover,et al.  Review of Hydrodynamic Scaling Laws in Aquatic Locomotion and Fishlike Swimming , 2005 .

[21]  D. Pendergast,et al.  Effect of swim suit design on passive drag. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[22]  G. Lauder,et al.  The hydrodynamics of eel swimming , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[23]  Wolfram Hage,et al.  Experiments with three-dimensional riblets as an idealized model of shark skin , 2000 .

[24]  C. Luer,et al.  The Amphibians of the Former Soviet Union , 2000, Copeia.

[25]  M. E. Demont,et al.  Scallop Shells Exhibit Optimization of Riblet Dimensions for Drag Reduction. , 1997, The Biological bulletin.

[26]  D. W. Bechert,et al.  Experiments on drag-reducing surfaces and their optimization with an adjustable geometry , 1997, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[27]  M. Triantafyllou,et al.  An Efficient Swimming Machine , 1995 .

[28]  Paolo Luchini,et al.  Resistance of a grooved surface to parallel flow and cross-flow , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[29]  M. Bartenwerfer,et al.  The viscous flow on surfaces with longitudinal ribs , 1989, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[30]  L. W. Reidy Flat plate reduction in a water tunnel using riblets , 1987 .

[31]  W. Reif,et al.  Hydrodynamics of the squamation in fast swimming sharks , 1982 .

[32]  J. C. Lane,et al.  Leading Edge Separation From a Blunt Plate at Low Reynolds Number , 1980 .

[33]  T. Ota,et al.  A Separated and Reattached Flow on a Blunt Flat Plate , 1976 .

[34]  J. Vogel,et al.  Functional Anatomy Of The Vertebrates , 2016 .

[35]  George V. Lauder,et al.  Hydrodynamics of Undulatory Propulsion , 2005 .

[36]  G. Lauder,et al.  The hydrodynamics of eel swimming: I. Wake structure , 2004 .

[37]  Karel F. Liem,et al.  Functional Anatomy of the Vertebrates: An Evolutionary Perspective , 1994 .

[38]  M. Mcpherson,et al.  Introduction to fluid mechanics , 1997 .

[39]  D. M. Bushnell,et al.  DRAG REDUCTION IN NATURE , 1991 .