Steerable Robot-assisted Micromanipulation in the Middle Ear: Preliminary Feasibility Evaluation.

HYPOTHESIS The use of a robotic manipulator with a dexterously orientable gripper will expand the ability of middle ear surgeons to perform precise tasks and access otherwise challenging anatomic regions. BACKGROUND Middle ear surgery presents unique challenges because of the constrained operative space and limited access to certain anatomic regions. METHODS A custom-designed robot with a sideways-reaching gripper was used to evaluate feasibility of manipulation tasks in different middle-ear anatomical zones. Reachable workspace within the middle ear, accuracy of free-space path following, and tool steadiness were compared between robotic telemanipulation and manual control. Preliminarily assessments of the robot's clinical utility included: 1) touching the round window niche, Eustachian tube orifice, and sinus tympani; 2) placing a stapes prosthesis; 3) removal of mockup diseased tissue in the sinus tympani. RESULTS The reachable workspace in the middle ear was considerably greater with the robot as compared with manual manipulation using a Rosen needle. In a simple path-tracing task outside the ear, robotic telemanipulation was associated with significantly reduced error. Within the middle ear, the robot contributed to steadier movement, but longer task completion time. The gripper successfully placed a 4.5 mm piston prosthesis, accessed the round window niche, Eustachian tube orifice, and removed mockup disease from the sinus tympani. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that robotic assistance using steerable tools allows surgeons to access challenging anatomic regions of the middle ear. Coordinated and accurate manipulation is evidenced by motion analyses and completion of feasibility tasks within the middle ear.

[1]  Christian Duriez,et al.  Middle-Ear Microsurgery Simulation to Improve New Robotic Procedures , 2014, BioMed research international.

[2]  P N Brett,et al.  An Automatic Technique for Micro-Drilling a Stapedotomy in the Flexible Stapes Footplate , 1995, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[3]  Marc L. Bennett,et al.  The Utility of a Predictive Model for Cochlear Implant Operating Time , 2016, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[4]  Jack H Noble,et al.  Comparison of Middle Ear Visualization With Endoscopy and Microscopy , 2016, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[5]  Thomas Maier,et al.  A new evaluation and training system for micro-telemanipulation at the middle ear , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  Yann Nguyen,et al.  Design, Kinematic Optimization, and Evaluation of a Teleoperated System for Middle Ear Microsurgery , 2012, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[7]  M. Schijven,et al.  Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review , 2012, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[8]  Haoran Yu,et al.  Design, calibration and preliminary testing of a robotic telemanipulator for OCT guided retinal surgery , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  D. Stewart A Platform with Six Degrees of Freedom , 1965 .

[10]  Yair Lotan,et al.  The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[11]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Robot-Assisted Stapedotomy: Micropick Fenestration of the Stapes Footplate , 2002, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[12]  Yann Nguyen,et al.  RobOtol: from design to evaluation of a robot for middle ear surgery , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  Mehmet C. Oz,et al.  Does Robotic Technology Make Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery Too Expensive? A Hospital Cost Analysis of Robotic and Conventional Techniques , 2005 .

[14]  K. Lillemoe,et al.  Robotic distal pancreatectomy: cost effective? , 2010, Surgery.

[15]  Jacob B. Hunter,et al.  Pediatric Endoscopic Cholesteatoma Surgery , 2016, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[16]  Mary S. Dietrich,et al.  Evaluation of Second Look Procedures for Pediatric Cholesteatomas , 2011, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.