Factor Comparability As A Means Of Determining The Number Of Factors And Their Rotation.

Several methods, mostly based on a consideration of the eigenvalues, have been previously used to determine the number of factors to retain in a factor analysis. This paper shows how split-half factor comparabilities, based on factor scores, can provide a direct and unambiguous method of determining the number of reliable factors that should be retained, and of assessing the appropriate rotation that should be used. The method is particularly appropriate for taxonomic factor analysis, where the factor scores are to be used as summary or classificatory measures. It is shown that, for respondents from non-homogenous populations, split-halves based on the sub-populations should be considered, as well as random split-halves. The discussion is supported by a number of principal components analyses, using synthetic data sets of known factor structure and an actual semantic response data bank.

[1]  W F Velicer,et al.  An Empirical Comparison Of The Similarity Of Principal Component, Image, And Factor Patterns. , 1977, Multivariate behavioral research.

[2]  Charles B. Crawford,et al.  Determining the Number of Interpretable Factors , 1975 .

[3]  W Revelle,et al.  Very Simple Structure: An Alternative Procedure For Estimating The Optimal Number Of Interpretable Factors. , 1979, Multivariate behavioral research.

[4]  J. Everett,et al.  WORK‐RELATED ATTITUDES OF ACADEMIC STAFF AT AUSTRALIAN UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES PART 2 — ROLE DIFFERENTIATION AND INSTITUTIONAL CULTURE , 1981 .

[5]  J. Horn.  A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis , 1965, Psychometrika.

[6]  W. Cooley,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 1972 .

[7]  Richard J. Harris.  A primer of multivariate statistics , 1975 .

[8]  Charles B. Crawford,et al.  A NOTE ON HORN'S TEST FOR THE NUMBER OF FACTORS IN FACTOR ANALYSIS , 1973 .

[9]  R. Jennrich,et al.  Rotation for simple loadings , 1966, Psychometrika.

[10]  H. Kaiser.  The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis , 1958 .

[11]  Albert Newhouse,et al.  Measures of invariance and comparability in factor analysis for fixed variables , 1964 .

[12]  A. Hakstian,et al.  SOME NOTES ON THE NUMBER OF FACTORS PROBLEM. , 1973, Multivariate behavioral research.

[13]  D. Jackson,et al.  A Comparison Of Component And Factor Patterns: A Monte Carlo Approach. , 1982, Multivariate behavioral research.

[14]  H. Kaiser.  The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis , 1960 .

[15]  J. Everett,et al.  Factor Comparability And The Advantages Of Multiple Group Factor Analysis , 1980 .

[16]  J. Everett,et al.  SOME EVIDENCE FOR AN INTERNATIONAL MANAGERIAL CULTURE , 1982 .

[17]  Hakstian Ar,et al.  The Behavior of Number-of-Factors Rules with Simulated Data. , 1982 .

[18]  L. Tucker.  A METHOD FOR SYNTHESIS OF FACTOR ANALYSIS STUDIES , 1951 .

[19]  W. Velicer.  Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations , 1976 .

[20]  A Score Matrix for Thurstone's Box Problem. , 1975, Multivariate behavioral research.