When police go shopping

Purpose – This article aims to alert readers to the procurement and acquisition activities of police agencies, to the risks that these entail, and to mechanisms for their effective management.Design/methodology/approach – The article explores the ways in which acquisition by police is conducted and regulated. It examines these relationships between police and the private sector from the perspective of their benefits, such as costs and efficiency gains, and the risks they entail, including overdependency, corruption and lack of accountability.Findings – Shopping by the public police is on the increase. Through procurement and outsourcing, police harness resources needed to cope with increasing demands on their services. Increased police activity in the marketplace, driven by changing ideological, economic and pragmatic considerations, represents a fundamental structural shift in policing. The article identifies appropriate institutional and procedural safeguards, and raises questions about the implications...

[1]  Julie Ayling,et al.  Ambiguous exchanges and the police , 2007 .

[2]  Julie Ayling.  Force Multiplier: People as a Policing Resource , 2007 .

[3]  Peter Grabosky,et al.  Private Sponsorship of Public Policing , 2007 .

[4]  Julie Ayling,et al.  Policing by Command: Enhancing Law Enforcement Capacity through Coercion , 2006 .

[5]  A. Crawford.  'Fixing Broken Promises?': Neighbourhood Wardens and Social Capital , 2006 .

[6]  Satu Salmi,et al.  What citizens think about the police: assessing actual and wished-for frequency of police activities in one's neighbourhood , 2005 .

[7]  D. Weatherburn,et al.  Law and Order in Australia: Rhetoric and Reality , 2004 .

[8]  A. Dorman.  Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[9]  P. Vincent-Jones,et al.  Contractual Governance: Institutional and Organizational Analysis , 2001 .

[10]  Jeremy Gans.  Privately paid public policing: Law and practice , 2000 .

[11]  Ian Loader,et al.  Consumer Culture and the Commodification of Policing and Security , 1999 .

[12]  L. Hancock.  Contractualism, Privatisation and Justice: Citizenship, the State and Managing Risk , 1998 .

[13]  L. Hancock,et al.  Policing, Accountability and Citizenship in the Market State* , 1998 .

[14]  Peter Grabosky,et al.  Using Non‐Governmental Resources to Foster Regulatory Compliance , 1995 .

[15]  Donald F. Kettl,et al.  Sharing Power: Public Governance and Private Markets , 1993 .

[16]  L. Johnston,et al.  The rebirth of private policing , 1992 .

[17]  Lawrence L. Martin,et al.  Purchase of service contracting , 1990 .

[18]  Susan H. Nycum,et al.  Computer crime , 1984, CACM.

[19]  C. Tapper.  Computer Crime , 1981, The Medico-legal journal.

[20]  E. Bensly.  To curry Favour , 1921 .

[21]  A. Crawford.  Democracy, Society and the Governance of Security: Policing and security as ‘club goods’: the new enclosures? , 2006 .

[22]  Jennifer Wood,et al.  Understanding Global Trends in Policing: Explanatory and Normative Dimensions , 2005 .

[23]  M. Schonteich,et al.  Private muscle. Outsourcing the provision of criminal justice services , 2004 .

[24]  P. Grabosky.  Toward a Theory of Public/Private Interaction in Policing , 2004 .

[25]  L. Salamon,et al.  The tools of government : a guide to the new governance , 2002 .

[26]  Richard G Fox,et al.  New crimes or new responses?: future directions in Australian criminal law. [Article based on a paper presented at the Australian Institute of Criminology, National Outlook Symposium on Crime in Australia (4th: 2001: Canberra).] , 2002 .