Efficient designs for sampling and subsampling in fisheries research based on ranked sets

Sampling strategies are developed based on the idea of ranked set sampling (RSS) to increase efficiency and therefore to reduce the cost of sampling in fishery research. The RSS incorporates information on concomitant variables that are correlated with the variable of interest in the selection of samples. For example, estimating a monitoring survey abundance index would be more efficient if the sampling sites were selected based on the information from previous surveys or catch rates of the fishery. We use two practical fishery examples to demonstrate the approach: site selection for a fishery-independent monitoring survey in the Australian northern prawn fishery (NPF) and fish age prediction by simple linear regression modelling a short-lived tropical clupeoid. The relative efficiencies of the new designs were derived analytically and compared with the traditional simple random sampling (SRS). Optimal sampling schemes were measured by different optimality criteria. For the NPF monitoring survey, the efficiency in terms of variance or mean squared errors of the estimated mean abundance index ranged from 114 to 199% compared with the SRS. In the case of a fish ageing study for Tenualosa ilisha in Bangladesh, the efficiency of age prediction from fish body weight reached 140%.

[1]  G. McIntyre,et al.  A method for unbiased selective sampling, using ranked sets , 1952 .

[2]  Stephen J. Smith,et al.  Improving the precision of design-based scallop drag surveys using adaptive allocation methods , 2006 .

[3]  Dana H. Hanselman,et al.  Applications in adaptive cluster sampling of Gulf of Alaska rockfish , 2000 .

[4]  T. Sager,et al.  Characterization of a Ranked-Set Sample with Application to Estimating Distribution Functions , 1988 .

[5]  Zehua Chen,et al.  Efficient regression analysis with ranked-set sampling. , 2004, Biometrics.

[6]  P. R. Neal,et al.  Catch-Age Analysis with Auxiliary Information , 1985 .

[7]  Zehua Chen,et al.  General ranked set sampling with cost considerations. , 2004, Biometrics.

[8]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  A new ranked set sample estimator of variance , 2002 .

[9]  Quantile estimation from ranked set sampling data , 2005 .

[10]  Ganapati P. Patil,et al.  Ranked set sampling , 2006 .

[11]  P. Yu,et al.  Regression estimator in ranked set sampling. , 1997, Biometrics.

[12]  Jaap van der Meer,et al.  Sampling design of monitoring programmes for marine benthos: a comparison between the use of fixed versus randomly selected stations , 1997 .

[13]  A. Atkinson Developments in the Design of Experiments, Correspondent Paper , 1982 .

[14]  Vic Barnett Ranked set sample design for environmental investigations , 2004, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[15]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  Nonparametric Two-Sample Procedures for Ranked-Set Samples Data , 1992 .

[16]  Daniel K. Kimura,et al.  Review of Statistical Aspects of Survey Sampling for Marine Fisheries , 2006 .

[17]  J. L. Clutter,et al.  Ranked Set Sampling Theory with Order Statistics Background , 1972 .

[18]  Omer Ozturk,et al.  Rank Regression in Ranked-Set Samples , 2002 .

[19]  W. G. Warren The potential of sampling with partial replacement for fisheries surveys , 1994 .

[21]  A. C. Atkinson,et al.  Developments in the Design of Experiments , 1982 .