A Comparison of Sedimentation Method and Active Sampler Analysis of Microbiological Indoor Air Quality - Case Study

Abstract The indoor air quality is of great importance for the health of people. Appropriate selection of methods, parameters and conditions for the analysis makes it possible to obtain the results that reliably reflect the actual state of affairs. The aim of this study was to compare the results of microbiological air analysis in selected rooms of the Biotechnology Center obtained using the sedimentation method and the impaction method. During the research, the SMA (for total bacteria number) and Sabouraud media (for total fungi number) were exposed to different times in sedimentation analysis and to different air volumes in the impaction method. In the case of the sedimentation method, significant differences were found in the total number of bacteria and fungi in 3 out of 7 rooms depending on the time of exposure. In the case of the impaction method, it was 4 out of 7 rooms for bacteria and 2 out of 7 for fungi, depending on the analysed volume of air. The comparison of the methods showed that 4 out of 6 rooms had higher number of microorganisms when impactor was used.

[1]  S. Gautam,et al.  The influence of meteorological variables and lockdowns on COVID-19 cases in urban agglomerations of Indian cities , 2022, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[2]  M. Kausar,et al.  Biological contaminants in the indoor air environment and their impacts on human health , 2021, Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health.

[3]  S. Tsai,et al.  Eco-Technology and Eco-Innovation for Green Sustainable Growth , 2021 .

[4]  Zhiyao Yang,et al.  Understanding building-occupant-microbiome interactions toward healthy built environments: A review , 2020, Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering.

[5]  R. Azizah,et al.  Microbiology Indoor Air Quality at Hospital During the Covid19 Pandemic , 2020, JURNAL KESEHATAN LINGKUNGAN.

[6]  M. Mokhtari,et al.  Microbiological analysis of bacterial and fungal bioaerosols from burn hospital of Yazd (Iran) in 2019 , 2020, Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering.

[7]  Bin Zhao,et al.  Association of the infection probability of COVID-19 with ventilation rates in confined spaces , 2020, Building Simulation.

[8]  H. Mbareche,et al.  Field sampling of indoor bioaerosols , 2020, Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research.

[9]  Jinbao Liu,et al.  Assessment of culturable airborne bacteria of indoor environments in classrooms, dormitories and dining hall at university: a case study in China , 2020, Aerobiologia.

[10]  A. Kukec,et al.  Microbiological and chemical quality of indoor air in kindergartens in Slovenia , 2020, International journal of environmental health research.

[11]  J. Pastuszka,et al.  Microbiological indoor air quality in an office building in Gliwice, Poland: analysis of the case study , 2018, Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health.

[12]  F. Reinthaler,et al.  Comparative study of impaction and sedimentation in an aerosol chamber using defined fungal spore and bacterial concentrations , 2017, PloS one.

[13]  C. Haig,et al.  Bioaerosol sampling: sampling mechanisms, bioefficiency and field studies , 2016, Journal of Hospital Infection.

[14]  H. Lal,et al.  Review of bioaerosols in indoor environment with special reference to sampling, analysis and control mechanisms , 2015, Environment International.

[15]  S. Almeida,et al.  Microbiological assessment of indoor air quality at different hospital sites. , 2015, Research in microbiology.

[16]  P. Grisoli,et al.  Evaluation of microbiological air quality and of microclimate in university classrooms , 2012, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[17]  J. Rostron,et al.  Sick building syndrome: A review of causes, consequences and remedies , 2008 .