Exploring Brain Hemodynamic Response Patterns via Deep Recurrent Autoencoder

For decades, task-based functional MRI (tfMRI) has been widely used in exploring functional brain networks and modeling brain activities. A variety of brain activity analysis methods for tfMRI data have been developed. However, these methods are mainly shallow models and are limited in faithfully modeling the complex spatial-temporal diverse and concurrent functional brain activities. Recently, recurrent neural networks (RNNs) demonstrate great superiority in modeling temporal dependency signals and autoencoder models have been proven to be effective in automatically estimating the optimal representations of the original data. These characteristics meet the requirement of modeling hemodynamic response patterns in tfMRI data. In order to take the advantages of both models, we proposed a novel unsupervised framework of deep recurrent autoencoder (DRAE) for modeling tfMRI data in this work. The basic idea of the DRAE model is to combine the deep recurrent neural network and autoencoder to automatically characterize the meaningful functional brain networks and corresponding diverse and complex hemodynamic response patterns underlying tfMRI data simultaneously. The proposed DRAE model has been tested on the motor tfMRI dataset of HCP 900 subjects release and all seven tfMRI datasets of HCP Q1 release. Extensive experimental results demonstrated the great superiority of the proposed method.

[1]  Fan Zhou,et al.  Identifying Brain Networks at Multiple Time Scales via Deep Recurrent Neural Network , 2019, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[2]  N. Logothetis What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI , 2008, Nature.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[4]  Jieping Ye,et al.  Holistic Atlases of Functional Networks and Interactions Reveal Reciprocal Organizational Architecture of Cortical Function , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  H. Bourlard,et al.  Auto-association by multilayer perceptrons and singular value decomposition , 1988, Biological Cybernetics.

[6]  Zachary Chase Lipton A Critical Review of Recurrent Neural Networks for Sequence Learning , 2015, ArXiv.

[7]  A. Andersen,et al.  Principal component analysis of the dynamic response measured by fMRI: a generalized linear systems framework. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  Jinglei Lv,et al.  Experimental Comparisons of Sparse Dictionary Learning and Independent Component Analysis for Brain Network Inference From fMRI Data , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Function in the human connectome: Task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior , 2013, NeuroImage.

[10]  Yu Zhao,et al.  Supervised Dictionary Learning for Inferring Concurrent Brain Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  B. Biswal,et al.  Blind source separation of multiple signal sources of fMRI data sets using independent component analysis. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.