Supervised SVM Transfer Learning for Modality-Specific Artefact Detection in ECG

The electrocardiogram (ECG) is an important diagnostic tool for identifying cardiac problems. Nowadays, new ways to record ECG signals outside of the hospital are being investigated. A promising technique is capacitively coupled ECG (ccECG), which allows ECG signals to be recorded through insulating materials. However, as the ECG is no longer recorded in a controlled environment, this inevitably implies the presence of more artefacts. Artefact detection algorithms are used to detect and remove these. Typically, the training of a new algorithm requires a lot of ground truth data, which is costly to obtain. As many labelled contact ECG datasets exist, we could avoid the use of labelling new ccECG signals by making use of previous knowledge. Transfer learning can be used for this purpose. Here, we applied transfer learning to optimise the performance of an artefact detection model, trained on contact ECG, towards ccECG. We used ECG recordings from three different datasets, recorded with three recording devices. We showed that the accuracy of a contact-ECG classifier improved between 5 and 8% by means of transfer learning when tested on a ccECG dataset. Furthermore, we showed that only 20 segments of the ccECG dataset are sufficient to significantly increase the accuracy.

[1]  Christopher Piorkowski,et al.  :Influence of the duration of Holter monitoring on the detection of arrhythmia recurrences after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: implications for patient follow-up. , 2010, International journal of cardiology.

[2]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Data Quality Assessment of Capacitively-Coupled ECG Signals , 2019, 2019 Computing in Cardiology (CinC).

[3]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Evaluation of a Multichannel Non-Contact ECG System and Signal Quality Algorithms for Sleep Apnea Detection and Monitoring , 2018, Sensors.

[4]  Agam Bansal,et al.  Portable out‐of‐hospital electrocardiography: A review of current technologies , 2018, Journal of arrhythmia.

[5]  Gerhard Tröster,et al.  Automatic Signal Appraisal for Unobtrusive ECG Measurements , 2010 .

[6]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Semi-supervised one-class transfer learning for heart rate based epileptic seizure detection , 2017, 2017 Computing in Cardiology (CinC).

[7]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Personalizing Heart Rate-Based Seizure Detection Using Supervised SVM Transfer Learning , 2020, Frontiers in Neurology.

[8]  Qiang Yang,et al.  A Survey on Transfer Learning , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[9]  Steffen Leonhardt,et al.  UnoViS: the MedIT public unobtrusive vital signs database , 2015, Health Information Science and Systems.

[10]  Steffen Leonhardt,et al.  ECG on the Road: Robust and Unobtrusive Estimation of Heart Rate , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Chris Van Hoof,et al.  Capacitive multi-electrode array with real-time electrode selection for unobtrusive ECG & BIOZ monitoring , 2019, 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[12]  Amanda Neil,et al.  Cardiac Event Recorders Yield More Diagnoses and Are More Cost-effective than 48-Hour Holter Monitoring in Patients with Palpitations: A Controlled Clinical Trial , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  Hagen Malberg,et al.  Cascaded output selection for processing of capacitive electrocardiograms by means of independent component analysis , 2013, 2013 Workshop on Sensor Data Fusion: Trends, Solutions, Applications (SDF).

[14]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control , 1977 .

[15]  Rong Yan,et al.  Adapting SVM Classifiers to Data with Shifted Distributions , 2007, Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW 2007).

[16]  Joachim M. Buhmann,et al.  The Balanced Accuracy and Its Posterior Distribution , 2010, 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[17]  Peter Sollich,et al.  Bayesian Methods for Support Vector Machines: Evidence and Predictive Class Probabilities , 2002, Machine Learning.

[18]  Kwang Suk Park,et al.  Heart Rate Variability Monitoring during Sleep Based on Capacitively Coupled Textile Electrodes on a Bed , 2015, Sensors.

[19]  S Dack,et al.  Value of Holter monitoring in assessing cardiac arrhythmias in symptomatic patients. , 1976, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Robust artefact detection in long-term ECG recordings based on autocorrelation function similarity and percentile analysis , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[21]  Daphne Koller,et al.  Support Vector Machine Active Learning with Applications to Text Classification , 2000, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[22]  Johan A. K. Suykens,et al.  Optimized fixed-size kernel models for large data sets , 2010, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[23]  Qiao Li,et al.  AF classification from a short single lead ECG recording: The PhysioNet/computing in cardiology challenge 2017 , 2017, 2017 Computing in Cardiology (CinC).

[24]  G D Clifford,et al.  Signal quality indices and data fusion for determining clinical acceptability of electrocardiograms , 2012, Physiological measurement.

[25]  Seung Min Lee,et al.  Wavelet approach to artifact noise removal from Capacitive coupled Electrocardiograph , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[26]  Mark Girolami,et al.  Orthogonal Series Density Estimation and the Kernel Eigenvalue Problem , 2002, Neural Computation.

[27]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Artefact detection and quality assessment of ambulatory ECG signals , 2019, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[28]  Patrick E. McSharry,et al.  Advanced Methods And Tools for ECG Data Analysis , 2006 .