Towards A Computational Model Of Poetry Generation

Proceedings of the AISB'00 Symposium on Creative; Cultural Aspects and Applications of AI; Cognitive Science

[1]  Mark Dras,et al.  Tree adjoining grammar and the reluctant paraphrasing of text , 1999 .

[2]  Joseph Weizenbaum,et al.  ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine , 1966, CACM.

[3]  Chris Mellish,et al.  Experiments Using Stochastic Search for Text Planning , 1998, INLG.

[4]  Matthew Stone,et al.  Sentence Planning as Description Using Tree Adjoining Grammar , 1997, ACL.

[5]  Nicolas N. Nicolov,et al.  Approximate text generation from non-hierarchical representations in a declarative framework , 1999 .

[6]  Aravind K. Joshi,et al.  Tree-adjoining grammars and lexicalized grammars , 1992, Tree Automata and Languages.

[7]  Jerry R. Hobbs.  Ontological Promiscuity , 1985, ACL.

[8]  Charles O. Hartman.  Virtual Muse: Experiments In Computer Poetry , 1996 .

[9]  Kim Binsted,et al.  Children's evaluation of computer-generated punning riddles , 1997 .

[10]  Mike Sharples,et al.  An Account of Writing as Creative Design , 1996 .

[11]  Michael Zock,et al.  Architectures for Natural Language Generation: Problems and Perspectives , 1993, EWNLG.

[12]  Kevin Knight,et al.  The Practical Value of N-Grams Is in Generation , 1998, INLG.

[13]  M. Boden.  The creative mind : myths & mechanisms , 1991 .

[14]  Ehud Reiter,et al.  Has a Consensus NL Generation Architecture Appeared, and is it Psycholinguistically Plausible? , 1994, INLG.

[15]  Matthew Stone,et al.  Paying Heed to Collocations , 1996, INLG.