Optimal Behavior of Demand Response Aggregators in Providing Balancing and Ancillary Services in Renewable-Based Power Systems

Due to the limited predictability and associated uncertainty of renewable energy resources, renewable-based electricity systems are confronted with instability problems. In such power systems, implementation of Demand Response (DR) programs not only can improve the system stability but also enhances market efficiency and system reliability. By implementing cloud-based engineering systems the utilization of DR will be increased and consequently DR will play a more crucial role in the future. Therefore, DR aggregators can efficiently take part in energy, balancing and ancillary services markets. In this paper, a model has been developed to optimize the behavior of a DR aggregator to simultaneously participate in the mentioned markets. To this end, the DR aggregator optimizes its offering/bidding strategies based on the contracts with its customers. In the proposed model, uncertainties of renewable energy resources and the prices of electricity markets are considered. Numerical studies show the effectiveness of the proposed model.

[1]  Saifur Rahman,et al.  Demand Response as a Load Shaping Tool in an Intelligent Grid With Electric Vehicles , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[2]  F. Nogales,et al.  Price-Taker Bidding Strategy under Price Uncertainty , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[3]  J. B. Almada,et al.  The future of low voltage networks: Moving from passive to active , 2011 .

[4]  J. Catalão,et al.  A Stochastic Multi-Layer Agent-Based Model to Study Electricity Market Participants Behavior , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  N. Amjady,et al.  Stochastic Multiobjective Market Clearing of Joint Energy and Reserves Auctions Ensuring Power System Security , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Hossein Seifi,et al.  Optimal retailer bidding in a DA market a new method considering risk and demand elasticity , 2011 .

[7]  Abbe E. Forman,et al.  Smart Grid , 2013, Int. J. E Politics.

[8]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Demand side management: Benefits and challenges ☆ , 2008 .

[9]  Peng Wang,et al.  A Framework to Implement Supply and Demand Side Contingency Management in Reliability Assessment of Restructured Power Systems , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  M. P. Moghaddam,et al.  Flexible demand response programs modeling in competitive electricity markets , 2011 .

[11]  Joao Catalao,et al.  Risk-Constrained Offering Strategy of Wind Power Producers Considering Intraday Demand Response Exchange , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[12]  Peter Palensky,et al.  Demand Side Management: Demand Response, Intelligent Energy Systems, and Smart Loads , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[13]  D. T. Nguyen,et al.  Walrasian Market Clearing for Demand Response Exchange , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  M. P. Moghaddam,et al.  Demand response modeling considering Interruptible/Curtailable loads and capacity market programs , 2010 .

[15]  M. Haghifam,et al.  A demand response based solution for LMP management in power markets , 2011 .

[16]  A. Yousefi,et al.  A probabilistic risk-based approach for spinning reserve provision using day-ahead demand response program , 2010 .

[17]  M. P. Moghaddam,et al.  Optimal real time pricing in an agent-based retail market using a comprehensive demand response model , 2011 .