Measurement of the activation volume in magnetic random access memory

Measuring thermal stability in magnetic random access memory devices is non-trivial. Recently, there has been much discussion on the appropriate model to use: single domain or domain wall nucleation. Of particular challenge is assessing the maximum size at which the single domain model can be assumed. Typically, this is estimated to be in the range of 20–30 nm based on a value of the exchange stiffness ([Formula: see text]) that is assumed, estimated using indirect measurements or derived from significantly thicker films. In this work, it is proposed that this maximum size can be measured directly via the “activation volume” ([Formula: see text]) or the “activation diameter” ([Formula: see text]), which originates from the concept of magnetic viscosity. This is conducted by measuring, using the time dependence of magnetization at different applied fields, [Formula: see text] in perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction pillars of varying effective anisotropy constant ([Formula: see text]) and diameter. It is shown that the trend in [Formula: see text] follows [Formula: see text] dependence, in good agreement with the analytic model for the critical diameter of coherent switching. Critically, it is also found that the smallest size for which a single domain, with coherent reversal, occurs is 20 nm. Thus, in devices with technologically relevant values of [Formula: see text], the macrospin model may only be used in 20 nm, or smaller, devices.

[1]  J. Katine,et al.  Thermal stability for domain wall mediated magnetization reversal in perpendicular STT MRAM cells with W insertion layers , 2020, Applied Physics Letters.

[2]  J. G. Alzate,et al.  Thermal stability and magnetization switching in perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions , 2020 .

[3]  D. Apalkov,et al.  Atomistic investigation of the temperature and size dependence of the energy barrier of CoFeB/MgO nanodots , 2019, Journal of Applied Physics.

[4]  J. Swerts,et al.  The magneto-optical Kerr effect for efficient characterization of thermal stability in dense arrays of p-MTJs , 2019, AIP Advances.

[5]  M. B. Hahn Temperature in micromagnetism: cell size and scaling effects of the stochastic Landau–Lifshitz equation , 2019, Journal of Physics Communications.

[6]  A. Kent,et al.  Reduced Exchange Interactions in Magnetic Tunnel Junction Free Layers with Insertion Layers , 2019, ACS Applied Electronic Materials.

[7]  K. Shimizu,et al.  Size dependence of the thermal stability factor in a perpendicular CoFeB/MgO magnetic tunnel junction studied by micromagnetic simulations , 2019, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics.

[8]  J. Swerts,et al.  Impact of Ta and W-based spacers in double MgO STT-MRAM free layers on perpendicular anisotropy and damping , 2017 .

[9]  Weisheng Zhao,et al.  Tunnel Junction with Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy: Status and Challenges , 2015, Micromachines.

[10]  Shoji Ikeda,et al.  Properties of magnetic tunnel junctions with a MgO/CoFeB/Ta/CoFeB/MgO recording structure down to junction diameter of 11 nm , 2014 .

[11]  K. O’Grady,et al.  The effect of SiO2 content on activation volumes in exchange coupled composite media , 2013 .

[12]  Ralph Skomski,et al.  Simple models of magnetism , 2008 .

[13]  Ming-Jinn Tsai,et al.  Interfacial and annealing effects on magnetic properties of CoFeB thin films , 2006 .

[14]  K. O'Grady,et al.  The activation volumes of reversal in ultra fine particles , 1990, International Conference on Magnetics.

[15]  M. Sato,et al.  Simple and approximate expressions of demagnetizing factors of uniformly magnetized rectangular rod and cylinder , 1989 .

[16]  P. Gaunt Magnetic viscosity and thermal activation energy , 1986 .

[17]  E. Wohlfarth The coefficient of magnetic viscosity , 1984 .

[18]  E. Wohlfarth,et al.  A mechanism of magnetic hysteresis in heterogeneous alloys , 1948, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.