The Abbreviated Impactor Measurement (AIM) Concept: Part II—Influence of Evaporation of a Volatile Component—Evaluation with a “Droplet-Producing” Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler (pMDI)-Based Formulation Containing Ethanol as Cosolvent

The abbreviated impactor measurement (AIM) concept is a potential solution to the labor-intensive full-resolution cascade impactor (CI) methodology for inhaler aerosol aerodynamic particle size measurement. In this validation study, the effect of increasing the internal dead volume on determined mass fractions relating to aerodynamic particle size was explored with two abbreviated impactors both based on the Andersen nonviable cascade impactor (ACI) operating principle (Copley fast screening Andersen impactor [C-FSA] and Trudell fast screening Andersen impactor [T-FSA]). A pressurized metered dose inhaler-delivered aerosol producing liquid ethanol droplets after propellant evaporation was chosen to characterize these systems. Measures of extrafine, fine, and coarse particle mass fractions from the abbreviated systems were compared with corresponding data obtained by a full-resolution ACI. The use of liquid ethanol-sensitive filter paper provided insight by rendering locations visible where partly evaporated droplets were still present when the “droplet-producing” aerosol was sampled. Extrafine particle fractions based on impactor-sized mass were near equivalent in the range 48.6% to 54%, comparing either abbreviated system with the benchmark ACI-measured data. The fine particle fraction of the impactor-sized mass determined by the T-FSA (94.4 ± 1.7%) was greater than using the C-FSA (90.5 ± 1.4%) and almost identical with the ACI-measured value (95.3 ± 0.4%). The improved agreement between T-FSA and ACI is likely the result of increasing the dead space between the entry to the induction port and the uppermost impaction stage, compared with that for the C-FSA. This dead space is needed to provide comparable conditions for ethanol evaporation in the uppermost parts of these impactors.

[1]  Adriano Aguzzi,et al.  Aerosols , 2011 .

[2]  Warren H. Finlay,et al.  Undersizing of droplets from a vented nebulizer caused by aerosol heating during transit through an anderson impactor , 1999 .

[3]  Jolyon P Mitchell,et al.  Cascade impactors for the size characterization of aerosols from medical inhalers: their uses and limitations. , 2003, Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine.

[4]  P. Byron Respiratory Drug Delivery , 1989 .

[5]  Abhishek Gupta,et al.  Balancing ethanol cosolvent concentration with product performance in 134a-based pressurized metered dose inhalers. , 2003, Journal of Aerosol Medicine.

[6]  Varsha Chavan,et al.  Novel system to investigate the effects of inhaled volume and rates of rise in simulated inspiratory air flow on fine particle output from a dry powder inhaler , 2008, AAPS PharmSci.

[7]  Abhishek Gupta,et al.  Comparison of the TSI Model 3306 Impactor Inlet with the Andersen Cascade Impactor: Solution Metered Dose Inhalers , 2004, Drug development and industrial pharmacy.

[8]  M. Nagel,et al.  The Abbreviated Impactor Measurement (AIM) Concept: Part 1—Influence of Particle Bounce and Re-Entrainment—Evaluation with a “Dry” Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler (pMDI)-Based Formulation , 2009, AAPS PharmSciTech.

[9]  Stephen W. Stein,et al.  Aiming for a moving target: challenges with impactor measurements of MDI aerosols. , 2008, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[10]  P. Myrdal,et al.  A theoretical and experimental analysis of formulation and device parameters affecting solution MDI size distributions. , 2004, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[11]  Nicholas C. Miller,et al.  Effect of Drug Load and Plate Coating on the Particle Size Distribution of a Commercial Albuterol Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) Determined Using the Andersen and Marple-Miller Cascade Impactors , 1997, Pharmaceutical Research.

[12]  J P Mitchell,et al.  Revised internal volumes of cascade impactors for those provided by mitchell and nagel. , 2005, Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine.

[13]  Michael A. Woessner,et al.  Application of heated inlet extensions to the TSI 3306/3321 system: comparison with the Andersen cascade impactor and next generation impactor. , 2006, Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine.