Development of a Generic Time-to-Contact Pilot Guidance Model

The time-to-contact ττ theory posits that purposeful actions can be conducted by coupling the actor’s motion onto the so-called ττ guides generated internally by their central nervous system. Although significant advances have been made in the application of ττ for flight control purposes, little research has been conducted to investigate how pilots are able to adapt their ττ-guidance strategy to different aircraft dynamics, or how a ττ-guide-based pilot–aircraft model might be used to represent control behavior. This paper reports on the development of such a model to characterize the adaptation of pilot guidance to variations in aircraft dynamics using data obtained from a clinical pilot-in-the-loop flight simulation experiment. The results indicate that pilots tend to maintain a constant coupling between the dynamic system’s motion and the ττ guide across a range of different configuration parameters. Simultaneously, the pilot modulates the guidance maneuver period to adapt to these different aircraft dynamics that result in changes in workload. Modeling the complete pilot stabilization and guidance function as a regulator plus inverter yields good comparative results between the pilot–aircraft model and simulator trajectory data, and it supports the hypothesis that the following ττ-based guidance strategies suppress an aircraft’s natural dynamics.

[1]  Michael Jump,et al.  Progress in the development of guidance strategies for the landing flare manoeuvre using tau‐based parameters , 2006 .

[2]  David N. Lee Guiding Movement by Coupling Taus , 1998 .

[3]  Douglas Thomson,et al.  Inverse simulation as a tool for flight dynamics research - Principles and applications , 2006 .

[4]  David J. Murray-Smith,et al.  Investigation of inverse simulation for design of feedforward controllers , 2007 .

[5]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  A Review of Quasi-Linear Pilot Models , 1967 .

[6]  David J. Murray-Smith,et al.  Sensitivity-Analysis Method for Inverse Simulation Application , 2007 .

[7]  William L. Garrard,et al.  Nonlinear inversion flight control for a supermaneuverable aircraft , 1992 .

[8]  Farid Kendoul,et al.  Bio-inspired TauPilot for automated aerial 4D docking and landing of Unmanned Aircraft Systems , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[9]  Gary Clark,et al.  How long do pilots look forward? Prospective visual guidance in terrain hugging flight , 2007 .

[10]  Alberto Isidori Elementary Theory of Nonlinear Feedback for Single-Input Single-Output Systems , 1995 .

[11]  G. D. Padfield,et al.  Where does the workload go when pilots attack maneuvers?: an , 1994 .

[12]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Perception–Action Strategy for Hummingbirds , 2010, Perception.

[13]  Ronald A. Hess,et al.  Assessment of Flight Simulator Fidelity in Multiaxis Tasks Including Visual Cue Quality , 2001 .

[14]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  Minimum Flying Qualities. Volume 2. Pilot Modeling for Flying Qualities Applications , 1990 .

[15]  Gareth Padfield Helicopter Flight Dynamics, Second Edition , 2007 .

[16]  David N. Lee,et al.  Sensory and intrinsic coordination of movement , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Aatd,et al.  US Army Aviation and Missile Command , 2003 .

[18]  Gareth D. Padfield,et al.  The tau of flight control , 2011, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[19]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  Pilot-Induced Oscillations and Human Dynamic Behavior , 1995 .

[20]  Marion A. Eppler,et al.  Development of Visually Guided Locomotion , 1998 .

[21]  Benjamin C. Kuo,et al.  AUTOMATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS , 1962, Universum:Technical sciences.

[22]  Felix Mora-Camino,et al.  Neural Networks Modelling for Aircraft Flight Guidance Dynamics , 2012 .

[23]  J R Tresilian,et al.  Four Questions of Time to Contact: A Critical Examination of Research on Interceptive Timing , 1993, Perception.

[24]  Michael Jones,et al.  Identification of Pilot Control Behaviour During Possible Rotorcraft Pilot Coupling Events , 2012 .

[25]  Ronald Hess Obtaining Multi-Loop Pursuit-Control Pilot Models From Computer Simulation , 2007 .

[26]  D. Izzo,et al.  TIME-TO-CONTACT ESTIMATION IN LANDING SCENARIOS USING FEATURE SCALES , 2011 .

[27]  M. Voskuijl,et al.  Simulation of automatic helicopter deck landings using nature inspired flight control , 2010, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[28]  Gareth D. Padfield,et al.  How do helicopter pilots know when to stop, turn or pull up? , 2001 .

[29]  Gareth D. Padfield Flying Qualities: Forms of Degradation , 2008 .

[30]  Gareth D. Padfield Progress with the adaptive pilot model in simulation fidelity , 2004 .

[31]  Linghai Lu,et al.  Tau guidance in boundary-avoidance tracking: new perspectives on pilot-induced oscillations , 2012 .

[32]  Ezra S. Krendel,et al.  Mathematical Models of Human Pilot Behavior , 1974 .

[33]  R A Hess,et al.  Simplified approach for modelling pilot pursuit control behaviour in multi-loop flight control tasks , 2006 .

[34]  Joan López-Moliner,et al.  Unifying Time to Contact Estimation and Collision Avoidance across Species , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[35]  Gareth D. Padfield,et al.  Flight Simulation in Academia HELIFLIGHT in its First Year of Operation , 2001 .

[36]  Michael Jump,et al.  Investigation of the Flare Maneuver Using Optical Tau , 2006 .

[37]  Nicolás Weiss,et al.  Constant-Optic-Flow Lunar Landing: Optimality and Guidance , 2011 .

[38]  Arthur W. Gubbels,et al.  Acceptance testing and commissioning of a flight simulator for rotorcraft simulation fidelity research , 2013 .

[39]  Stéphane Viollet,et al.  Optic Flow Based Visual Guidance: From Flying Insects to Miniature Aerial Vehicles , 2009 .

[40]  Alberto Isidori,et al.  Nonlinear Control Systems, Third Edition , 1995, Communications and Control Engineering.

[41]  R. Bootsma,et al.  Information Used in Detecting Upcoming Collision , 2003, Perception.