Storage phosphor direct magnification mammography in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography--a phantom study.

Contact mammography with current photostimulable storage phosphors is hampered by its low spatial resolution. Detail visualization can be improved by geometric magnification radiography which enlarges small details to exceed inherent image noise. This study compares storage phosphor mammography using a dedicated direct magnification system with state-of-the-art conventional screen-film mammography. Storage phosphor direct magnification survey views (1.7x) and spot views (4x) were obtained with a prototype mammography unit providing focal spot sizes of 120-40 microns. Conventional technique screen-film survey views (1.1x) and spot views (1.8x) served as comparison. A contrast detail study and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis using an anthropomorphic breast phantom with superimposed microcalcifications was performed. Contrast detail resolution in the digital and conventional survey views were equivalent. For the spot views, contrast detail resolution was significantly higher with the digital technique (p < 0.001). ROC analysis of 400 observations demonstrated a significantly higher performance (p < 0.001) with digital images versus conventional screen-film mammograms. The area under the ROC curve (Az) in the digital survey views was 0.76 +/- 0.07 versus 0.59 +/- 0.02 in the conventional technique. In digital spot views, Az was 0.82 +/- 0.07 as compared with 0.66 +/- 0.04 in the conventional spot views. These results suggest that storage phosphor digital mammography in conjunction with direct geometric magnification technique may be superior to conventional screen-film mammography in the detection of microcalcifications.

[1]  E. Rummeny,et al.  Artificial bone erosions: detection with magnification radiography versus conventional high-resolution radiography. , 1994, Radiology.

[2]  J W Oestmann,et al.  A comparison of digitized storage phosphors and conventional mammography in the detection of malignant microcalcifications. , 1988, Investigative radiology.

[3]  G. J. S. Parkin.  Clinical aspects of Direct digital mammography , 1995, Journal of digital imaging.

[4]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Magnification film mammography: image quality and clinical studies. , 1977 .

[5]  A R Cowen,et al.  A clinical comparison between conventional and digital mammography utilizing computed radiography. , 1994, The British journal of radiology.

[6]  E A Sickles,et al.  The role of magnification technique in modern mammography. , 1987, Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer.

[7]  M L Giger,et al.  Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications: evaluation of performance on mammograms from multiple centers. , 1995, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[8]  K Doi,et al.  Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: automated alignment of breast images and its effect on bilateral-subtraction technique. , 1994, Medical physics.

[9]  D. Dance.  Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Y. Higashida,et al.  Detection of subtle microcalcifications: comparison of computed radiography and screen-film mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[11]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Spatial Resolution in Digital Mammography , 1993, Investigative radiology.

[12]  C Kimme-Smith,et al.  Digital mammography. A comparison of two digitization methods. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[13]  K Doi,et al.  Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms: applications of artificial neural networks. , 1992, Medical physics.

[14]  K. Doi,et al.  Computer-aided detection of microcalcifications in mammograms. Methodology and preliminary clinical study. , 1988, Investigative radiology.

[15]  A. Haverich,et al.  Radiographic assessment of structural defects in Björk-Shiley convexo-concave prostheses. , 1995, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[16]  H Imhof,et al.  Noise reduction by radiographic magnification. , 1977, Radiology.

[17]  L. Liberman,et al.  Use of digital mammography in needle localization procedures. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.