Individual differences influence collective behaviour in social caterpillars

The expression of individual differences within a population often depends on environmental conditions. We investigated, first, whether there are differences between individual group-living forest tent caterpillars, Malacosoma disstria, that are expressed only in nutritionally unbalanced environments, and second, to what extent these individual behavioural differences influence the strategies used by the group to exploit food resources. We offered groups of caterpillars a binary choice between two equal food sources, either containing a balanced ratio of protein and carbohydrate or lacking digestible carbohydrate. Individual caterpillars responded to the diet treatment by becoming either inactive or active. The existence of these two behavioural categories was evident under dietary imbalance but not when foods were nutritionally balanced. At a collective level, the individual differences in behaviour led to colony decisions that were dependent upon the ratio of the two behavioural categories present in the group. Colonies comprising a majority of active caterpillars (‘active biased’) were less cohesive than inactive-biased colonies. Under dietary imbalance, active-biased groups did not focus their activity on one food source but split and exploited two sources at the same time. Since both food sources were nutritionally unbalanced, these groups grow less well than inactive-biased groups that remained on one food source. The coexistence of two foraging strategies may provide a compromise between maintaining colony cohesion and optimizing food location and diet balancing.

[1]  G. Theraulaz,et al.  Response threshold reinforcements and division of labour in insect societies , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  T. Casey,et al.  Caterpillars : ecological and evolutionary constraints on foraging , 1993 .

[3]  N. D. Addy Rearing the Forest Tent Caterpillar on an Artificial Diet , 1969 .

[4]  F. W. Robertson The ecological genetics of growth in Drosophila 6. The genetic correlation between the duration of the larval period and body size in relation to larval diet. , 1963 .

[5]  S. J. Simpson,et al.  When the group denies individual nutritional wisdom , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  T. D. Fitzgerald Trail following and recruitment: Response of eastern tent caterpillarMalacosoma americanum to 5β-cholestane-3,24-dione and 5β-cholestan-3-one , 1993, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[7]  J. Lawton,et al.  Does Foliage Damage Influence Predation on the Insect Herbivores of Birch , 1988 .

[8]  S. Simpson,et al.  A geometric analysis of nutrient regulation in the generalist caterpillar Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval). , 2002, Journal of insect physiology.

[9]  E. Despland,et al.  Pros and cons of group living in the forest tent caterpillar: separating the roles of silk and of grouping , 2007 .

[10]  L B Browne,et al.  Physiologically Induced Changes in Resource-Oriented Behavior , 1993 .

[11]  K. Bakker An Analysis of Factors Which Determine Success in Competition for Food Among Larvae of Drosophila Melanogaster , 1962 .

[12]  S. Simpson,et al.  A comparison of nutritional regulation in solitarious- and gregarious-phase nymphs of the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[13]  I. Couzin,et al.  Cannibal crickets on a forced march for protein and salt. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  G. T. Schmidt,et al.  Reaction of Five Species of Soybean Caterpillars to Attack, by the Predator, Podisus maculiventris , 1978 .

[15]  T. D. Fitzgerald The Tent Caterpillars , 1995 .

[16]  S. J. Simpson Regulation of a Meal: Chewing Insects , 1995 .

[17]  D. Raubenheimer,et al.  Nutritional imbalance in an extreme generalist omnivore: tolerance and recovery through complementary food selection , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  M. Sokolowski,et al.  Genetic analysis of the foraging microregion of Drosophila melanogaster. , 1993, Genome.

[19]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Foraging trade‐offs and resource patchiness: theory and experiments with a freshwater snail community , 2001 .

[20]  Sami Ahmad Herbivorous insects : host-seeking behavior and mechanisms , 1985 .

[21]  M. Sokolowski,et al.  The nature of Drosophila melanogaster , 2006, Current Biology.

[22]  M. Sokolowski,et al.  Genetic localization of foraging (for): a major gene for larval behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1989, Genetics.

[23]  T. Seeley,et al.  FORAGING STRATEGY OF HONEYBEE COLONIES IN A TEMPERATE DECIDUOUS FOREST , 1982 .

[24]  W. J. Bell,et al.  Search orientation in adultDrosophila melanogaster: Responses of rovers and sitters to resource dispersion in a food patch , 1988, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[25]  J. Greenblatt,et al.  BEHAVIORAL STUDIES ON MALACOSOMA DISSTRIA (LEPIDOPTERA: LASIOCAMPIDAE) , 1976, The Canadian Entomologist.

[26]  Daniel R. Papaj,et al.  3 – Individual Variation in Host Location by Phytophagous Insects* , 1983 .

[27]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Information Processing in Social Insects , 1999, Birkhäuser Basel.

[28]  Stephen J. Simpson,et al.  A behavioural analysis of phase change in the desert locust , 1999 .

[29]  Philip Weinstein,et al.  Leadership behaviour in sawfly larvae Perga dorsalis (Hymenoptera: Pergidae) , 1997 .

[30]  Cori Bargmann,et al.  Natural Variation in a Neuropeptide Y Receptor Homolog Modifies Social Behavior and Food Response in C. elegans , 1998, Cell.

[31]  E. Jablonka,et al.  Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life , 2005 .

[32]  M. West-Eberhard Phenotypic Plasticity and the Origins of Diversity , 1989 .

[33]  A male-biased primary sex ratio and larval mortality in Eucheira socialis (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) , 1999 .

[34]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[35]  M. Boer A Colour-Polymorphism in Caterpillars of Bupalus Piniarius (L.) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) , 1970 .

[36]  Deborah M Gordon,et al.  Task‐specific expression of the foraging gene in harvester ants , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[37]  S. Ohnishi Relationship between larval feeding behavior and viability inDrosophila melanogaster andD. simulans , 1979, Behavior genetics.

[38]  J. Elser,et al.  Too much of a good thing: on balanced diets and maximal growth , 2005 .

[39]  K. Ross,et al.  Fitness effects of group merging in a social insect , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  M. B. Sokolowski,et al.  Rover/sitterDrosophila melanogaster larval foraging polymorphism as a function of larval development, food-patch quality, and starvation , 1989, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[41]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Amplification of individual preferences in a social context: the case of wall-following in ants , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  G. Harvey NUTRITIONAL STUDIES OF EASTERN SPRUCE BUDWORM (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE): II. STARCHES , 1975, The Canadian Entomologist.

[43]  David Raubenheimer,et al.  The Hungry Locust , 2000 .

[44]  W. Wellington,et al.  QUALITATIVE CHANGES IN NATURAL POPULATIONS DURING CHANGES IN ABUNDANCE , 1960 .

[45]  J. Koolhaas,et al.  Heritable variation for aggression as a reflection of individual coping strategies , 1991, Experientia.

[46]  M. Sokolowski,et al.  Drosophila larval foraging behavior. II. Selection in the sibling species,D. melanogaster andD. simulans , 1983, Behavior genetics.

[47]  K. Clancy The role of sugars in western spruce budworm nutritional ecology , 1992 .

[48]  S. Simpson,et al.  Does Bertrand's rule apply to macronutrients? , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  T. D. Fitzgerald Role of Trail Pheromone in Foraging and Processionary Behavior of Pine Processionary Caterpillars Thaumetopoea pityocampa , 2003, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[50]  R. Greenspan,et al.  Natural behavior polymorphism due to a cGMP-dependent protein kinase of Drosophila. , 1997, Science.

[51]  B. L. Barton Physiologically Induced Changes in Resource-Oriented Behavior , 1993 .

[52]  S. J. Simpson,et al.  Nutrient balancing in grasshoppers: behavioural and physiological correlates of dietary breadth , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[53]  W. Wellington,et al.  INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AS A FACTOR IN POPULATION DYNAMICS: THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PROBLEM , 1957 .

[54]  É. Bauce,et al.  Does nutrition-related stress carry over to spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) progeny? , 2002, Bulletin of Entomological Research.

[55]  M. B. Sokolowski,et al.  Mutations in the larval foraging gene affect adult locomotory behavior after feeding in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  Julia Krüger,et al.  Influence of Gene Action Across Different Time Scales on Behavior , 2002, Science.

[57]  E. Despland,et al.  How well do specialist feeders regulate nutrient intake? Evidence from a gregarious tree-feeding caterpillar , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[58]  Maria B Sokolowskp Foraging Strategies of Drosophila melanogaster : A Chromosomal Analysis , 2022 .

[59]  P. Gowaty Developmental Plasticity and Evolution Mary Jane West-Eberhard , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[60]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  Environmental Heterogeneity and the Coexistence of Desert Rodents , 1988 .

[61]  A. Honěk,et al.  Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: a general relationship , 1993 .

[62]  S. Simpson,et al.  Integrating nutrition : a geometrical approach , 2022 .

[63]  L. B. Browne,et al.  Regulatory Mechanisms in Insect Feeding , 1975 .

[64]  Samuel M. Scheiner,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity : functional and conceptual approaches , 2004 .

[65]  S. Simpson,et al.  A correlation between macronutrient balancing and insect host-plant range: evidence from the specialist caterpillar Spodoptera exempta (Walker). , 2003, Journal of insect physiology.

[66]  E. Despland,et al.  How do primary nutrients affect the performance and preference of forest tent caterpillars on trembling aspen? , 2006, The Canadian Entomologist.

[67]  E. Bernays Feeding by lepidopteran larvae is dangerous , 1997 .

[68]  M. Sokolowski Genetic aspects to differences in foraging behavior , 1985, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[69]  G. Robinson,et al.  Influence of Gene Action Across Different Time Scales on Behavior , 2002, Science.

[70]  S. J. Simpson,et al.  The role of food distribution and nutritional quality in behavioural phase change in the desert locust , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[71]  E. Haukioja,et al.  PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY IN FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF SAWFLY LARVAE , 1999 .

[72]  R. Sibly,et al.  Optimal foraging when regulating intake of multiple nutrients , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[73]  Craig W. Osenberg,et al.  COMPLEMENTARY FORAGING BEHAVIORS ALLOW COEXISTENCE OF TWO CONSUMERS , 1999 .

[74]  W. J. Bell,et al.  Influence of spatial patterning of resources on search orientation of adult Drosophila melanogaster , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[75]  J. Bale,et al.  Thermal ecology of gregarious and solitary nettle-feeding nymphalid butterfly larvae , 2000, Oecologia.

[76]  M. A. Russell The ecological genetics of growth in Drosophila , 1969 .

[77]  R. Denno,et al.  Aggregation facilitates larval growth in the neotropical nymphalid butterfly Chlosyne janais , 1997 .

[78]  S. Simpson,et al.  Nutrient regulation in relation to diet breadth: a comparison of Heliothis sister species and a hybrid , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[79]  G. Harvey NUTRITIONAL STUDIES OF EASTERN SPRUCE BUDWORM (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE): I. SOLUBLE SUGARS , 1974, The Canadian Entomologist.

[80]  J. Elser,et al.  Too much of a good thing: on stoichiometrically balanced diets and maximal growth. , 2006, Ecology.

[81]  K. Porter Basking behaviour in larvae of the butterfly Euphydryas aurinia , 1982 .

[82]  E. Wilson,et al.  Caste and ecology in the social insects. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.

[83]  M. Sokolowski,et al.  Drosophila: Genetics meets behaviour , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[84]  David Raubenheimer,et al.  Food distance and its effect on nutrient balancing in a mobile insect herbivore , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[85]  R. R. Krausz Living in Groups , 2013 .