Linguistically Motivated Complementizer Choice in Surface Realization
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jun'ichi Tsujii,et al. Probabilistic Models for Disambiguation of an HPSG-Based Chart Generator , 2005, IWPT.
[2] Mark Johnson,et al. How the Statistical Revolution Changes (Computational) Linguistics , 2009 .
[3] Michael Elhadad,et al. FUF: the Universal Unifier User Manual Version 2.0 , 1989 .
[4] Jason Baldridge,et al. Coupling CCG and Hybrid Logic Dependency Semantics , 2002, ACL.
[5] Michael White,et al. Perceptron Reranking for CCG Realization , 2009, EMNLP.
[6] Sali A. Tagliamonte,et al. No momentary fancy! The zero ‘complementizer’ in English dialects , 2005, English Language and Linguistics.
[7] Stephan Oepen,et al. Maximum Entropy Models for Realization Ranking , 2005 .
[8] James R. Curran,et al. Wide-Coverage Efficient Statistical Parsing with CCG and Log-Linear Models , 2007, Computational Linguistics.
[9] Michael White,et al. Efficient Realization of Coordinate Structures in Combinatory Categorial Grammar , 2006 .
[10] Martin Kay,et al. Syntactic Process , 1979, ACL.
[11] John A. Hawkins,et al. Why are zero-marked phrases close to their heads? , 2003 .
[12] Michael Elhadad,et al. FUF: the Universal Unifier User Manual Version 5.2 , 1991 .
[13] Roger Levy,et al. Speakers optimize information density through syntactic reduction , 2006, NIPS.
[14] Rena Torres Cacoullos,et al. On the persistence of grammar in discourse formulas: a variationist study of that , 2009 .
[15] Brian Roark,et al. Discriminative Language Modeling with Conditional Random Fields and the Perceptron Algorithm , 2004, ACL.