Biliary brush cytology: factors associated with positive yields on biliary brush cytology.

AIM To evaluate the yield of brushing biliary strictures and the factors associated with a positive result in biliary strictures. METHODS Data on all consecutive patients (01/02-10/05) who were identified to have a biliary stricture and who underwent biliary brush cytology were collected. The yield of positive biliary brush cytology was evaluated and compared to results with the gold standard for diagnosis (defined as either definitive surgical histology or clinical course). Additionally, associated factors of positive results including stricture location, gender, age, mass size, length of stricture, and dilatation prior to brushing cytology were assessed. RESULTS From 199 patients who had brushing cytology samples (10 patients were excluded due to lack of gold standard diagnosis), 77 patients had positive brushing cytology (yield 41%). Variables associated with positive cytology brushing on initial endoscopic retrograde cholangiography were age 1.02 (1.00-1.05), mass size>1 cm 2.22 (1.01-4.89) and length of stricture>1 cm 3.49 (1.18-10.2). The sensitivity of biliary brushing was 61%, its specificity 98%, the positive predictive value reached 99%, and the negative predictive value was 57%. CONCLUSION Our results revealed a 41% positive yield from brushing cytology. The sensitivity of biliary brushing cytology in our center was 61% and the specificity was 98%. Predictors of positive yield include older age, mass size>1 cm, and stricture length of >1 cm.

[1]  A. Bhalla,et al.  Efficacy of endoscopic wire guided biliary brushing in the evaluation of biliary strictures. , 2003, Tropical gastroenterology : official journal of the Digestive Diseases Foundation.

[2]  C. Younger,et al.  Influence of stricture dilation and repeat brushing on the cancer detection rate of brush cytology in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction. , 2003, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[3]  C. Jensen,et al.  Cytologic Diagnosis of Adenocarcinoma in Biliary and Pancreatic Duct Brushings , 2002, Advances in anatomic pathology.

[4]  R. Carter,et al.  Brush cytology in the assessment of pancreatico–biliary strictures: a review of 406 cases , 2001, Journal of clinical pathology.

[5]  W. van Steenbergen,et al.  Brush cytology of ductal strictures during ERCP. , 2000, Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica.

[6]  S. Sherman,et al.  Triple-tissue sampling at ERCP in malignant biliary obstruction. , 2000, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[7]  K. Block,et al.  Analysis of false-negative diagnoses on endoscopic brush cytology of biliary and pancreatic duct strictures: the experience at 2 university hospitals. , 2000, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[8]  G. Adler,et al.  Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. , 1999, Endoscopy.

[9]  R. Hruban,et al.  Clinical value of K-ras codon 12 analysis and endobiliary brush cytology for the diagnosis of malignant extrahepatic bile duct stenosis. , 1999, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[10]  P. Thuluvath,et al.  Cholangiocarcinoma: a review. , 1997, The Gastroenterologist.

[11]  J. Mansfield,et al.  A prospective evaluation of cytology from biliary strictures. , 1997, Gut.

[12]  V. Pugliese,et al.  Endoductal Tissue Sampling of Biliary Strictures through Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopan Creatography (ERCP) , 1997, Tumori.

[13]  R. Venu,et al.  Brush cytology for pancreatic carcinoma: an analysis of factors influencing results. , 1996, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[14]  M. Conio,et al.  Endoscopic retrograde forceps biopsy and brush cytology of biliary strictures: a prospective study. , 1995, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[15]  T. Ponchon,et al.  Value of endobiliary brush cytology and biopsies for the diagnosis of malignant bile duct stenosis: results of a prospective study. , 1995, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[16]  P. Cotton,et al.  Benign, dysplastic, or malignant--making sense of endoscopic bile duct brush cytology: results in 149 consecutive patients. , 1995, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[17]  P. Foutch Diagnosis of cancer by cytologic methods performed during ERCP. , 1994, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[18]  V. Swaroop,et al.  Diagnosis of malignant obstructive jaundice by bile cytology: results improved by dilating the bile duct strictures. , 1994, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[19]  A. Ferrari,et al.  Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies. , 1994, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[20]  B. Davidson,et al.  Diagnostic value of cytology for biliary stricture , 1993, The British journal of surgery.

[21]  J. Dooley,et al.  A prospective controlled study comparing brush and bile exfoliative cytology for diagnosing bile duct strictures. , 1992, Gut.

[22]  P. Foutch,et al.  A prospective, controlled analysis of endoscopic cytotechniques for diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures. , 1991, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[23]  M. E. Ryan Cytologic brushings of ductal lesions during ERCP. , 1991, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[24]  P. Foutch,et al.  Endoscopic retrograde wire-guided brush cytology for diagnosis of patients with malignant obstruction of the bile duct. , 1990, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[25]  H. Gonda,et al.  Combined use of brushing cytology and endoscopic retrograde pancreatography for the early detection of pancreatic cancer. , 1989, Acta cytologica.

[26]  J. Lee Brush cytology and the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary malignancy during ERCP. , 2006, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[27]  L. Santi,et al.  Tissue sampling from the common bile duct through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic papillo(sphinctero)tomy and drainage in juxtapapillary malignancies , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy.

[28]  J. Leung,et al.  Tissue sampling at ERCP in suspected pancreatic cancer. , 1998, Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America.

[29]  G. Kocjan,et al.  Bile duct brushings cytology: Potential pitfalls in diagnosis , 1997, Diagnostic cytopathology.