Damage Classification in CFRP Laminates Using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Approach

Signal processing is an important element used for identifying damage in any SHM-related application. The method here is used to extract features from the use of different types of sensors, of which there are many. The responses from the sensors are also interpreted to classify the location and severity of the damage. This paper describes the signal processing approaches used for detecting the impact locations and monitoring the responses of impact damage. Further explanations are also given on the most widely-used software tools for damage detection and identification implemented throughout this research work. A brief introduction to these signal processing tools, together with some previous work related to impact damage detection, are presented and discussed in this paper.

[1]  Keith Worden,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF A STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING METHODOLOGY: PART I. NOVELTY DETECTION ON A LABORATORY STRUCTURE , 2003 .

[2]  Keith Worden,et al.  Identification of impact damage in CRRP laminates using the NDT approach , 2009 .

[3]  Keith Worden,et al.  On impact damage detection and quantification for CFRP laminates using structural response data only , 2011 .

[4]  Karl Pearson F.R.S. LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space , 1901 .

[5]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[6]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[7]  Keith Worden,et al.  Impact damage detection and quantification in CFRP laminates; a precursor to machine learning , 2009 .

[8]  K. Worden,et al.  Visualisation and Dimension Reduction of Acoustic Emission Data for Damage Detection , 1999 .

[9]  Keith Worden,et al.  Damage Identification in CRFP Laminates using a Statistical Method , 2011 .

[10]  Bogdan Gabrys,et al.  Data-driven Soft Sensors in the process industry , 2009, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[11]  Keith Worden,et al.  A SEM-Based Study of Structural Impact Damage , 2010 .

[12]  M. Imregun,et al.  Combined neural network and reduced FRF techniques for slight damage detection using measured response data , 2001 .

[13]  Jean-Claude Golinval,et al.  Principal Component Analysis of a Piezosensor Array for Damage Localization , 2003 .

[14]  Mehmet Imregun,et al.  STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DETECTION USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS AND MEASURED FRF DATA REDUCED VIA PRINCIPAL COMPONENT PROJECTION , 2001 .

[15]  A. J. Morris,et al.  Wavelets and non-linear principal components analysis for process monitoring , 1999 .

[16]  Keith Worden,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF A STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING METHODOLOGY: PART II. NOVELTY DETECTION ON A GNAT AIRCRAFT , 2003 .