Mission profile aware robustness assessment of automotive power devices

In this paper we propose to exploit so called Mission Profiles to address increasing requirements on safety and power efficiency for automotive power ICs. These Mission Profiles constrain the required device performance space to valid application scenarios. Mission Profile data can be represented in arbitrary forms like temperature histograms or cumulated drive cycle data. Hence, the derivation of realistic verification scenarios on device level requires the generation of environmental properties as e.g. temperatures, board net conditions or currents. For the assessment of real application robustness we present a methodology to extract finite state machines out of measured vehicle data and integrate them in Mission Profiles. Subsequently Markov processes are derived from these finite state machines in order to automatically generate Mission Profile compliant test scenarios for the design and verification process. As a motivating example we show industry fault cases in which missing application fitness to power transient variations finally results in device failure. Verification results based on lab data are outlined and show the benefits of a fully mission profile driven IC verification flow.

[1]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[2]  S. P. Lloyd,et al.  Least squares quantization in PCM , 1982, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[3]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise , 1996, KDD.

[4]  Tao Li,et al.  A Low Voltage Bandgap Reference Circuit with Current Feedback , 2003 .

[5]  R.W. De Doncker,et al.  Inverter design for hybrid electrical vehicles considering mission profiles , 2005, 2005 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference.

[6]  M. André Real-world driving cycles for measuring cars pollutant emissions - Part A: The ARTEMIS European driving cycles , 2009 .

[7]  Aie Electric and Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2009 .

[8]  C. Detcheverry,et al.  Validating foundry technologies for extended mission profiles , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium.

[9]  B. Barbedette,et al.  Electric vehicle drivetrain: Sizing and validation using general and particular mission profiles , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics.

[10]  Georg Pelz,et al.  Configurable load emulation using FPGA and power amplifiers for automotive power ICs , 2012, Proceeding of the 2012 Forum on Specification and Design Languages.

[11]  G. Feld,et al.  An Online Estimation of Energy Recovery in an Electric Vehicle Using ARTEMIS Mission Profiles , 2012, 2012 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference.

[12]  Georg Pelz,et al.  Measuring and improving the robustness of automotive smart power microelectronics , 2012, 2012 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE).

[13]  Martin Lukasiewycz,et al.  Embedded systems and software challenges in electric vehicles , 2012, 2012 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE).

[14]  Daniel Hahn,et al.  Complexity, quality and robustness - the challenges of tomorrow's automotive electronics , 2012, 2012 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE).

[15]  Ulf Schlichtmann,et al.  Reliability challenges for electric vehicles: From devices to architecture and systems software , 2013, 2013 50th ACM/EDAC/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC).

[16]  G. Pelz,et al.  Robustness Metrics for Automotive Power Microelectronics , 2013 .