Implications of dynamic spectrum management for regulation

The Coase theorem suggests that a regulatory scheme, which clearly defines spectrum property rights and allows transactions between participants, induces an optimal spectrum assignment. This paper argues that the conditions required by Coase are gradually achieved by the introduction of Dynamic Spectrum Management (DSM), which enables a dynamic reassignment of spectrum bands at different times and places. DSM reduces the costs associated with spectrum transactions and thus provides an opportunity to enhance efficiency through voluntary transactions. This study analyzes the factors affecting the benefits of a regulatory scheme allowing transactions, compares and quantifies the potential gains associated with different spectrum regimes by employing agent-based simulations and suggests policy implications for spectrum regulation. Dynamic Spectrum Management (DSM) technologies can effectively decrease transaction costs if property rights are defined on a detailed level.The Coase theorem suggests that these conditions induce an optimal outcome regardless of the initial spectrum assignment.This study quantifies the benefits associated with different regulatory schemes allowing transactions in a DSM context by employing agent-based simulations.The results show significant potential gains associated with a flexible spectrum regime such as pluralistic licensing.

[1]  Thomas R. Casey,et al.  Flexible spectrum management for mobile broadband services: How does it vary across advanced and emerging markets? , 2013 .

[2]  Tapio Soikkeli,et al.  Contextual usage patterns in smartphone communication services , 2011, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[3]  Ole Grondalen,et al.  Business case evaluations for LTE network offloading with cognitive femtocells , 2013 .

[4]  Y. Barzel,et al.  Measurement Cost and the Organization of Markets , 1982, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[5]  Arturas Medeisis,et al.  Pluralistic licensing , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

[6]  Berna Sayrac,et al.  Cognitive radio systems specific for IMT systems: Operator's view and perspectives , 2013 .

[7]  Leonardo Badia,et al.  A performance evaluation tool for spectrum sharing in multi-operator LTE networks , 2012, Comput. Commun..

[8]  R. Coase,et al.  The Problem of Social Cost , 1960, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[9]  Benoit Pierre Freyens A policy spectrum for spectrum economics , 2009, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[10]  Oliver Holland,et al.  Sharing incentivization through flexible spectrum licensing , 2014, 2014 9th International Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications (CROWNCOM).

[11]  B. Freyens,et al.  Efficient Allocation of Radio Spectrum , 2014 .

[12]  D. Allen Homesteading and Property Rights; Or, "How the West Was Really Won" , 1991, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[13]  Benoit Pierre Freyens,et al.  Allocative vs. technical spectrum efficiency , 2011 .

[14]  Annalisa Durantini,et al.  The spectrum policy reform paving the way to cognitive radio enabled spectrum sharing , 2013 .

[15]  Jan Markendahl,et al.  Business opportunities using white space spectrum and cognitive radio for mobile broadband services , 2012, 2012 7th International ICST Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications (CROWNCOM).

[16]  Ronald H. Coase,et al.  The Federal Communications Commission , 1959, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[17]  Luigi Alberto Franzoni,et al.  Transmitters and receivers' investment to avoid interference: Is there an optimal regime? , 2011 .

[18]  Johannes M. Bauer,et al.  Comparing welfare for spectrum property and spectrum commons governance regimes , 2005 .

[19]  Martin Cave,et al.  The unfinished history of usage rights for spectrum , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN).

[20]  Arthur A. Small,et al.  Risk sharing in Coasean contracts , 2003 .

[21]  W. Reichl,et al.  Spectrum allocation and its relevance for competition , 2012 .

[22]  Carlos Caicedo,et al.  The Viability of Spectrum Trading Markets , 2009, 2010 IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum (DySPAN).

[23]  Dipankar Raychaudhuri,et al.  Cognitive radio technology: From distributed spectrum coordination to adaptive network collaboration , 2008, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[24]  Gianmarco Baldini,et al.  The evolution of cognitive radio technology in Europe: Regulatory and standardization aspects , 2013 .

[25]  Hamid Aghvami,et al.  Challenges of real-time secondary usage of spectrum , 2008, Comput. Networks.

[26]  Varadharajan Sridhar,et al.  Introduction of dynamic spectrum management technologies: The role of industry openness and spectrum policy , 2013 .