Prognostic power of conventional echocardiography in individuals without history of cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Echocardiographic abnormalities are associated with a higher incidence of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether echocardiographic abnormalities are predictors of cardiovascular events in individuals without previous cardiovascular diseases. The PubMed, Scopus, and SciELO databases were searched for longitudinal studies investigating the association between echocardiographic abnormalities and cardiovascular events among individuals without known cardiovascular diseases. Two independent reviewers analyzed data on the number of participants, age and sex, echocardiographic alterations, follow-up time, and cardiovascular outcomes. The meta-analysis estimated the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 test. Twenty-two longitudinal studies met the eligibility criteria, comprising a total of 55,603 patients. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was associated with non-fatal cardiovascular events (RR 2.16; 95% CI 1.22-3.84), death from cardiovascular disease (RR 2.58; 95% CI 1.83- 3.64), and all-cause mortality (RR 2.02; 95% CI 1.34-3.04). Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and left atrial dilation (LA) were associated with fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events (RR 2.01; 95% CI 1.32-3.07) and (RR 1.78; 95% CI 1.16-2.73), respectively. Aortic root dilation was associated with non-fatal cardiovascular events (RR 1.25; 95% CI 1.09-1.43). In conclusion, LVH, LVDD, dilations of the LA, and of the aortic root were associated with an increased risk of adverse events in individuals without previous cardiovascular diseases. This study suggests that simple data obtained on conventional echocardiography can be an important predictor of cardiovascular outcomes in a low-risk population.

[1]  Takao Kato,et al.  Association of the low e′ and high E/e′ with long-term outcomes in patients with normal ejection fraction: a hospital population-based observational cohort study , 2019, BMJ Open.

[2]  D. Conen,et al.  Left atrial dimension and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with and without atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2019, Heart.

[3]  L. Lind,et al.  Change in left ventricular geometry over 10 years in the elderly and risk of incident cardiovascular disease , 2019, Journal of hypertension.

[4]  Danielle M. Enserro,et al.  Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in the Community: Impact of Diagnostic Criteria on the Burden, Correlates, and Prognosis , 2018, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[5]  A. Cai,et al.  Prognostic value of tissue Doppler E/e' ratio in hypertension patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction , 2018, Clinical and experimental hypertension.

[6]  S. O’Flynn,et al.  Appropriate use criteria for transthoracic echocardiography: Are they relevant to European centers? , 2018, Echocardiography.

[7]  F. Flachskampf,et al.  EACVI appropriateness criteria for the use of transthoracic echocardiography in adults: a report of literature and current practice review , 2017, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[8]  A. Khera,et al.  Multimodality Strategy for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment: Performance in 2 Population-Based Cohorts , 2017, Circulation.

[9]  Wendy S. Post,et al.  Comparison of Carotid Plaque Score and Coronary Artery Calcium Score for Predicting Cardiovascular Disease Events: The Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis , 2017, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[10]  T. Biering-Sørensen,et al.  Left ventricular filling pressure by septal and lateral E/e′ equally predict cardiovascular events in the general population , 2017, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[11]  D. Berman,et al.  All-cause mortality by age and gender based on coronary artery calcium scores. , 2016, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[12]  J. Gardin,et al.  Usefulness of Left Ventricular Mass and Geometry for Determining 10-Year Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults Aged >65 Years (from the Cardiovascular Health Study). , 2016, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  G. Mancia,et al.  Prognostic Significance of Left Atrial Enlargement in a General Population: Results of the PAMELA Study , 2014, Hypertension.

[14]  E. Benjamin,et al.  The natural history of left ventricular geometry in the community: clinical correlates and prognostic significance of change in LV geometric pattern. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[15]  G. Mancia,et al.  Aortic root diameter and risk of cardiovascular events in a general population: data from the PAMELA study , 2014, Journal of hypertension.

[16]  C. Lewis,et al.  Left atrial dimension and traditional cardiovascular risk factors predict 20-year clinical cardiovascular events in young healthy adults: the CARDIA study. , 2014, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[17]  J. Staessen,et al.  Prognostic Value of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in a General Population , 2014, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[18]  C. Lewis,et al.  Framingham score and LV mass predict events in young adults: CARDIA study. , 2014, International journal of cardiology.

[19]  F. Aziz,et al.  Diastolic Heart Failure: A Concise Review , 2013, Journal of clinical medicine research.

[20]  James D. Thomas,et al.  Incremental prognostic value of diastolic dysfunction in low risk patients undergoing echocardiography: beyond Framingham score , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[21]  Susan Cheng,et al.  Aortic root remodeling and risk of heart failure in the Framingham Heart study. , 2013, JACC. Heart failure.

[22]  K. Chien,et al.  Left ventricular mass and risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause death among ethnic Chinese--the Chin-Shan Community Cardiovascular Cohort study. , 2011, International journal of cardiology.

[23]  K. Chien,et al.  Aortic Root Dimension as an Independent Predictor for All‐Cause Death in Adults <65 Years of Age (from The Chin‐Shan Community Cardiovascular Cohort Study) , 2010, Echocardiography.

[24]  U. John,et al.  Heart valve sclerosis predicts all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. , 2010, Atherosclerosis.

[25]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[26]  A. Hofman,et al.  Echocardiographic parameters and all-cause mortality: the Rotterdam Study. , 2009, International journal of cardiology.

[27]  R. Devereux,et al.  Left atrial diameter as an independent predictor of first clinical cardiovascular events in middle-aged and elderly adults: the Strong Heart Study (SHS). , 2006, American heart journal.

[28]  J. Gardin,et al.  Usefulness of aortic root dimension in persons > or = 65 years of age in predicting heart failure, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality and acute myocardial infarction (from the Cardiovascular Health Study). , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[29]  D. Wiebers,et al.  Mitral Annular Calcification, Aortic Valve Sclerosis, and Incident Stroke in Adults Free of Clinical Cardiovascular Disease: The Strong Heart Study , 2005, Stroke.

[30]  J. Salonen,et al.  Left atrium size and the risk of cardiovascular death in middle-aged men. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.

[31]  J. Gardin,et al.  Increased left ventricular mass is a risk factor for the development of a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction within five years: the Cardiovascular Health Study. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  Yasuhiko Takemoto,et al.  Prediction of risk for first age-related cardiovascular events in an elderly population: the incremental value of echocardiography. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[33]  H. S. Klopfenstein,et al.  M-mode echocardiographic predictors of six- to seven-year incidence of coronary heart disease, stroke, congestive heart failure, and mortality in an elderly cohort (the Cardiovascular Health Study). , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[34]  P. Okin,et al.  Prognostic implications of left ventricular hypertrophy. , 2001, American heart journal.

[35]  D. Levy,et al.  Prognosis of left ventricular geometric patterns in the Framingham Heart Study. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[36]  D. Levy,et al.  Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  P. Tugwell,et al.  The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses , 2014 .

[38]  D. Jacobs,et al.  Prevalence, prospective risk markers, and prognosis associated with the presence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in young adults: the coronary artery risk development in young adults study. , 2013, American journal of epidemiology.