Leaf- and plant-level carbon gain in yellow birch, sugar maple, and beech seedlings from contrasting forest light environments

Leaf-level photosynthetic-light response and plant-level daily carbon gain were estimated for seedlings of moderately shade-tolerant yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis Britton) and shade-tolerant sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) and beech (Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.) growing in gaps and under a closed canopy in a sugar maple stand at Duchesnay, Que. All three species had a higher photosynthetic capacity (A(max)) in the gaps than in shade, but yellow birch and beech responded more markedly than sugar maple to the increase in light availability. The high degree of plasticity observed in beech suggests that the prediction that photosynthetic plasticity should decrease with increasing shade tolerance may not hold when comparisons are made among a few late-successional species. Unit-area daily carbon gain (C(A)) was significantly higher in the gaps than in shade for all three species, but no significant difference was observed between light environments for plant-level carbon gain (C(W)). In shade, we found no difference of C(A) and C(W) among species. In gaps, beech had a significantly higher C(A) than sugar maple but similar to that of birch, and birch had a significantly higher C(W) than maple but similar to that of beech. Sugar maple consistently had lower carbon gains than yellow birch and beech but is nevertheless the dominant species at our study site. These results indicate that although plant-level carbon gain is presumably more closely related to growth and survival of a species than leaf-level photosynthesis, it is still many steps removed from the ecological success of a species.

[1]  N. Boardman.  Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants. , 1977 .

[2]  Derek A. Roff,et al.  DISTRIBUTION-FREE AND ROBUST STATISTICAL METHODS: VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO PARAMETRIC STATISTICS? , 1993 .

[3]  W. Hill,et al.  5 – Effects of Light , 1996 .

[4]  Christian Messier,et al.  A simple and efficient method to estimate microsite light availability under a forest canopy , 1996 .

[5]  K. T. Logan.  Adaptations of the photosynthetic apparatus of sun- and shade-grown yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis Britt.) , 1970 .

[6]  C. Canham.  Suppression and release during canopy recruitment in Fagus grandifolia , 1990 .

[7]  P. Reich,et al.  Leaf mass per area, nitrogen content and photosynthetic carbon gain in Acer saccharum seedlings in contrasting forest light environments , 1992 .

[8]  M. Lechowicz,et al.  The photosynthetic response of eight species of Acer to simulated light regimes from the centre and edges of gaps , 1997 .

[9]  F. Bazzaz.  The Physiological Ecology of Plant Succession , 1979 .

[10]  L. Gross.  PHOTOSYNTHETIC DYNAMICS IN VARYING LIGHT ENVIRONMENTS: A MODEL AND ITS APPLICATION TO WHOLE LEAF CARBON GAIN' , 1982 .

[11]  F. S. Baker.  A Revised Tolerance Table , 1949 .

[12]  N. Brown,et al.  Photosynthetic characteristics of dipterocarp seedlings in three tropical rain forest light environments: a basis for niche partitioning? , 1997, Oecologia.

[13]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  13 – Coping with Environmental Heterogeneity: The Physiological Ecology of Tree Seedling Regeneration across the Gap—Understory Continuum , 1994 .

[14]  Christian Messier,et al.  Physical simulation of trees to study the effects of forest light environment, branch type and branch spacing on light interception and transmission , 1996 .

[15]  Jari Perttunen,et al.  LIGNUM: A Tree Model Based on Simple Structural Units , 1996 .

[16]  R. Teskey,et al.  A relationship between carbon dioxide, photosynthetic efficiency and shade tolerance , 1985 .

[17]  J. Taylor.  An Introduction to Error Analysis , 1982 .

[18]  C. Field.  On the Role of Photosynthetic Responses in Constraining the Habitat Distribution of Rainforest Plants , 1988 .

[19]  P. Reich,et al.  Leaf carbon and nutrient assimilation and conservation in species of differing successional status in an oligotrophic Amazonian forest , 1995 .

[20]  P. Reich,et al.  Water relations and gas exchange of Acer saccharum seedlings in contrasting natural light and water regimes. , 1992, Tree physiology.

[21]  R. W. Pearcy.  Photosynthetic gas exchange responses of Australian tropical forest trees in canopy, gap and understory micro-environments , 1987 .

[22]  M. Press,et al.  PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN RELATION TO GROWTH AND SEEDLING ECOLOGY OF TWO DIPTEROCARP RAIN FOREST TREE SPECIES , 1996 .

[23]  P. Reich,et al.  Trade-offs in seedling survival, growth, and physiology among hardwood species of contrasting successional status along a light-availability gradient , 2001 .

[24]  Anthony Alan Clifford,et al.  Multivariate error analysis : a handbook of error propagation and calculation in many-parameter systems , 1973 .

[25]  C. Canham,et al.  Chapter 11 – The Response of Woody Plants to Disturbance: Patterns of Establishment and Growth , 1985 .

[26]  L. Aarssen,et al.  On the relationship between shade tolerance and shade avoidance strategies in woodland plants , 1997 .

[27]  P. White,et al.  The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics , 1986 .

[28]  I. Birch,et al.  GROWTH OF TREE SEEDLINGS AS AFFECTED BY LIGHT INTENSITY , 1965 .

[29]  M. Küppers,et al.  4 – Canopy Gaps: Competitive Light Interception and Economic Space Filling—A Matter of Whole-Plant Allocation , 1994 .

[30]  P. White,et al.  Natural disturbance and gap phase dynamics in southern Appalachian spruce-fir forests , 1985 .

[31]  Gordon C. Tucker.  Fagus grandifolia Ehrh. , 2000 .

[32]  J. Denslow.  Chapter 17 – Disturbance-Mediated Coexistence of Species , 1985 .

[33]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  Gap Partitioning among Maples (Acer) in Central New England: Shoot Architecture and Photosynthesis , 1994 .

[34]  Charles D. Canham,et al.  Growth and Canopy Architecture of Shade‐Tolerant Trees: Response to Canopy Gaps , 1988 .

[35]  O. Björkman.  Responses to Different Quantum Flux Densities , 1981 .

[36]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[37]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  Gap Partitioning Among Maples (Acer) in Central New England: Survival and Growth , 1995 .

[38]  Steward T. A. Pickett,et al.  Chapter 2 – Disturbance Regimes in Temperate Forests , 1985 .

[39]  D. M. Gates,et al.  Effects of Temperature and Light on Photosynthesis of Dominant Species of a Northern Hardwood Forest , 1988, Botanical Gazette.

[40]  T. Spies,et al.  Light regimes beneath closed canopies and tree-fall gaps in temperate and tropical forests , 1990 .

[41]  R. Chazdon,et al.  Plasticity of leaf anatomy of two rain forest shrubs in relation to photosynthetic light acclimation , 1993 .

[42]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  Plant Stems: Biomechanical Adaptation for Energy Capture and Influence on Species Distributions , 1995 .

[43]  John A. Silander,et al.  Juvenile Tree Survivorship as a Component of Shade Tolerance , 1995 .

[44]  R. R. Rhodes,et al.  Regional Silviculture of the United States , 1962 .

[45]  E. DeLucia,et al.  Sapling biomass allocation and growth in the understory of a deciduous hardwood forest. , 1998, American journal of botany.

[46]  C. Canham.  Different Respones to Gaps Among Shade‐Tollerant Tree Species , 1989 .

[47]  M. Küppers,et al.  Ecological significance of above-ground architectural patterns in woody plants: A question of cost-benefit relationships. , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[48]  Lawrence K. Forcier.  Reproductive Strategies and the Co-occurrence of Climax Tree Species , 1975, Science.

[49]  D. Sims,et al.  5 – Photosynthetic Acclimation to Changing Light Environments: Scaling from the Leaf to the Whole Plant , 1994 .

[50]  Frank Berninger,et al.  Simulated irradiance and temperature estimates as a possible source of bias in the simulation of photosynthesis , 1994 .

[51]  Christian Messier,et al.  Growth and morphological responses of yellow birch, sugar maple, and beech seedlings growing under a natural light gradient , 1998 .

[52]  A. Benedetto,et al.  Effects of light intensity and light quality on the obligate shade plant Aglaonema commutatum. II. Photosynthesis and dry-matter partitioning , 1990 .

[53]  E. Nikinmaa,et al.  Effects of light availability and sapling size on the growth, biomass allocation, and crown morphology of understory sugar maple, yellow birch, and beech , 2000 .

[54]  J. Grace,et al.  Growth and photosynthesis of tropical forest tree seedlings (Bischofia javanica Blume) as influenced by a change in light availability. , 1993, Tree physiology.

[55]  Kate Lajtha,et al.  The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics , 1987 .

[56]  R. Chazdon.  LEAF DISPLAY, CANOPY STRUCTURE, AND LIGHT INTERCEPTION OF TWO UNDERSTORY PALM SPECIES , 1985 .

[57]  M. Ducrey.  Influence of shade on photosynthetic gas exchange of 7 tropical rain-forest species from Guadeloupe (French West Indies) , 1994 .

[58]  D. Larson,et al.  Environmental controls of carbon uptake in two woody species with contrasting distributions at the edge of cliffs. , 1990 .

[59]  F. Herbert Bormann,et al.  Leaf phenology, photosynthesis, and the persistence of saplings and shrubs in a mature northern hardwood forest. , 1998, Tree physiology.

[60]  David W. Lee,et al.  Photosynthetic Responses of Tropical Forest Plants to Contrasting Light Environments , 1996 .

[61]  E. Rincón,et al.  Responses to light changes in tropical deciduous woody seedlings with contrasting growth rates , 1997, Oecologia.

[62]  Peter B. Reich,et al.  Are shade tolerance, survival, and growth linked? Low light and nitrogen effects on hardwood seedlings , 1996 .

[63]  M. Abrams,et al.  Gas exchange, leaf structure and nitrogen in contrasting successional tree species growing in open and understory sites during a drought. , 1995, Tree physiology.

[64]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  Adaptation to Sun and Shade: a Whole-Plant Perspective , 1988 .

[65]  C. Körner.  Some Often Overlooked Plant Characteristics as Determinants of Plant Growth: A Reconsideration , 1991 .

[66]  S. Payette,et al.  Disturbance regime of a cold temperate forest as deduced from tree-ring patterns: the Tantaré Ecological Reserve, Quebec , 1990 .

[67]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  BIRCH SEEDLING RESPONSES TO DAILY TIME COURSES OF LIGHT IN EXPERIMENTAL FOREST GAPS AND SHADEHOUSES , 1993 .

[68]  T. Kohyama.  A functional model describing sapling growth under a tropical forest canopy , 1991 .

[69]  C. Canham.  Suppression and release during canopy recruitment in Acer saccharum , 1985 .