Application of Bio-Inspired Sensing, Perception and Control Technology to Autonomous UAV Missions

[1]  S. Pratt,et al.  A modelling framework for understanding social insect foraging , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[2]  J. Fewell.  Social Biomimicry: what do ants and bees tell us about organization in the natural world? , 2015 .

[3]  S. Pratt,et al.  Emergence of group rationality from irrational individuals , 2011 .

[4]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  The GRASP Multiple Micro-UAV Testbed , 2010, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[5]  S. Pratt,et al.  A tunable algorithm for collective decision-making , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Raman K. Mehra,et al.  Heterogeneous Cooperative Control of Multiple UAVs with Collaborative Assignment and Reactive Motion Planning , 2008 .

[7]  S. Pratt.  Behavioral mechanisms of collective nest-site choice by the ant Temnothorax curvispinosus , 2005, Insectes Sociaux.

[8]  R. Pfeifer,et al.  Self-Organization, Embodiment, and Biologically Inspired Robotics , 2007, Science.

[9]  Spring Berman,et al.  Biologically inspired redistribution of a swarm of robots among multiple sites , 2008, Swarm Intelligence.

[10]  Vikyath D Rao,et al.  Automated monitoring reveals extreme interindividual variation and plasticity in honeybee foraging activity levels , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  Tim Kovacs,et al.  On optimal decision-making in brains and social insect colonies , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[12]  S. Pratt.  Quorum sensing by encounter rates in the ant Temnothorax albipennis , 2005 .

[13]  Samuel Ellis,et al.  A Simple Threshold Rule Is Sufficient to Explain Sophisticated Collective Decision-Making , 2011, PloS one.

[14]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Strategies for choosing between alternatives with different attributes: exemplified by house-hunting ants , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  Collaborative Mission Planning & Autonomous Control Technology (CoMPACT) System Employing Swarms of UAVs , 2009 .

[16]  J. Herbers.  Nest site limitation and facultative polygyny in the ant Leptothorax longispinosus , 1986, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Collective behavior of interacting self-propelled particles , 2000, cond-mat/0611742.

[18]  Stephen C. Pratt,et al.  Nest Site Choice in Social Insects , 2019, Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior.

[19]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[20]  Manuela M. Veloso,et al.  Automatically tracking and analyzing the behavior of live insect colonies , 2001, AGENTS '01.

[21]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Information flow, opinion polling and collective intelligence in house-hunting social insects. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[22]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Individual and collective decision-making during nest site selection by the ant Leptothorax albipennis , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[23]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  An agent-based model of collective nest choice by the ant Temnothorax albipennis , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  J. Heinze,et al.  Nest site limitation and colony takeover in the ant Leptothorax nylanderi , 1998 .

[25]  S. Pratt,et al.  The cavity-dwelling ant Leptothorax curvispinosus uses nest geometry to discriminate between potential homes , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  E. Robinson,et al.  Can ant colonies choose a far-and-away better nest over an in-the-way poor one? , 2008, Animal Behaviour.