Increasing secondary and renewable material use: a chance constrained modeling approach to manage feedstock quality variation.

The increased use of secondary (i.e., recycled) and renewable resources will likely be key toward achieving sustainable materials use. Unfortunately, these strategies share a common barrier to economical implementation - increased quality variation compared to their primary and synthetic counterparts. Current deterministic process-planning models overestimate the economic impact of this increased variation. This paper shows that for a range of industries from biomaterials to inorganics, managing variation through a chance-constrained (CC) model enables increased use of such variable raw materials, or heterogeneous feedstocks (hF), over conventional, deterministic models. An abstract, analytical model and a quantitative model applied to an industrial case of aluminum recycling were used to explore the limits and benefits of the CC formulation. The results indicate that the CC solution can reduce cost and increase potential hF use across a broad range of production conditions through raw materials diversification. These benefits increase where the hFs exhibit mean quality performance close to that of the more homogeneous feedstocks (often the primary and synthetic materials) or have large quality variability. In terms of operational context, the relative performance grows as intolerance for batch error increases and as the opportunity to diversify the raw material portfolio increases.

[1]  D Mihailidis,et al.  Optimal blending of out-of-specifications substances , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[2]  Grecia R. Matos,et al.  Consumption of materials in the United States, 1900-1995 , 1998 .

[3]  Geraldo Ferrer,et al.  MATERIAL PLANNING FOR A REMANUFACTURING FACILITY , 2001 .

[4]  L. V. Wassenhove,et al.  MANAGING PRODUCT RETURNS FOR REMANUFACTURING , 2001 .

[5]  Gilvan C. Souza,et al.  CAPACITATED REMANUFACTURING WITH SERVICE LEVEL CONSTRAINTS* , 2002 .

[6]  V. Guide Production planning and control for remanufacturing: industry practice and research needs , 2000 .

[7]  A. Roy Safety first and the holding of assetts , 1952 .

[8]  Gary M. Scott,et al.  Fiber fractionation as a method of improving handsheet properties after repeated recycling , 1995 .

[9]  M. Kumral Application of chance-constrained programming based on multi-objective simulated annealing to solve a mineral blending problem , 2003 .

[10]  J. Allison,et al.  A Linear Programming Model for Development of Feed Formulas under Mill-Operating Conditions , 1957 .

[11]  J. H. Westbrook Problems with residual and additive elements and their control through specifications , 1980, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[12]  Ismail Serdar Bakal,et al.  Effects of Random Yield in Remanufacturing with Price‐Sensitive Supply and Demand , 2006 .

[13]  Joel Rosenblatt,et al.  Collagen gel systems for sustained delivery and tissue engineering. , 2003, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[14]  W. H. Evers,et al.  A New Model for Stochastic Linear Programming , 1967 .

[15]  Mikael Rönnqvist,et al.  Modelling the pooling problem at the New Zealand Refining Company , 1997 .

[16]  David R. Olsen,et al.  Recombinant microbial systems for the production of human collagen and gelatin , 2005, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[17]  Donna Mangun,et al.  Incorporating component reuse, remanufacture, and recycle into product portfolio design , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[18]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Coal blending optimization under uncertainty , 1995 .

[19]  Randolph Kirchain,et al.  Modeling methods for managing raw material compositional uncertainty in alloy production , 2007 .

[20]  T. E. Baker,et al.  Successive Linear Programming at Exxon , 1985 .

[21]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  A simultaneous optimization approach for off-line blending and scheduling of oil-refinery operations , 2006, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[22]  David E. Debeau Linear Programming Isn't Always the Answer , 1957 .

[23]  Fredrik Nilsson,et al.  Utilization of the natural variations in wood properties in production of TMP : Comparison between pilot plant and mill scale trials using different assortments of Norway spruce pulpwood , 2003 .

[24]  W. Good,et al.  Correlating mooney viscosity to average molecular weight , 1972 .

[25]  M. Abtahi,et al.  Mechanical and Viscoelastic Properties of Natural Rubber/ Reclaimed Rubber Blends , 2006 .

[26]  Risto Lahdelma,et al.  Fuzzy chance constrained linear programming model for optimizing the scrap charge in steel production , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  N. Demarquette,et al.  Effect of the processing conditions and the addition of trans-polyoctenylene rubber on the properties of natural rubber/styrene–butadiene rubber blends , 2008 .

[28]  Gerhard Tintner A Note on Stochastic Linear Programming , 1960 .

[29]  Jitka Dupa MELT CONTROL � CHARGE OPTIMIZATION VIA STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING , 2006 .

[30]  V D R Guide,et al.  Buffering from material recovery uncertainty in a recoverable manufacturing environment , 1997 .

[31]  C. Panne,et al.  Minimum-Cost Cattle Feed Under Probabilistic Protein Constraints , 1963 .

[32]  Kumar Rajaram,et al.  Grade Selection and Blending to Optimize Cost and Quality , 2001, Oper. Res..

[33]  A. J. Hartley,et al.  Steelworks control of residuals , 1980, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[34]  I. Hussein,et al.  Study of the miscibility and mechanical properties of NBR/HNBR blends , 2004 .

[35]  A. Charnes,et al.  Chance-Constrained Programming , 1959 .

[36]  Markus A. Reuter,et al.  Fundamental limits for the recycling of end-of-life vehicles , 2006 .

[37]  Yves Crama,et al.  A discussion of production planning approaches in the process industry , 2001 .

[38]  W. Aalbersberg Industrial proteins in perspective , 2003 .

[39]  Juhani Lehtonen,et al.  Differentiation in pulp and paper business , 2004 .

[40]  Markus A. Reuter,et al.  Thermodynamic metrics for measuring the “sustainability” of design for recycling , 2008 .

[41]  K. Vorlop,et al.  Industrial bioconversion of renewable resources as an alternative to conventional chemistry , 2004, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.