A map representation of the ASET-RSET concept

Abstract Assessing life safety by comparing the available safe egress time (ASET) and the required safe egress time (RSET) is a prominent task in performance-based fire safety design. The calculation of a safety margin by subtracting RSET from ASET is a straightforward concept and is easy to understand. However, when the concept was developed, fire and evacuation models only provided punctual information derived from experimental correlations or hand calculations. Nowadays, complex computer models for fire and evacuation dynamics have become state of the art. However, the ASET-RSET concept has not adapted to these developments. While uncertainties related to the model input and the model application are widely recognised, uncertainties emerging from analysing the output only play a subordinate role. Therefore, we introduce a map representation of ASET and RSET. The maps are generated by a spatial evaluation of the quantities used to determine ASET and RSET. Based on that, a difference map is introduced to represent the safety margin throughout the entire domain. Finally, a method is proposed to reduce the high information content of the difference maps to one scalar measure of consequences. This facilitates multivariate or risk-based analysis approaches and thus is able to reduce the uncertainties in performance-based design.

[1]  P. L. Hinkley Comparison of an Established Method of Calculation of Smoke Filling of Large Scale Spaces with Recent Experiments , 1988 .

[2]  Vytenis Babrauskas,et al.  RSET/ASET, a flawed concept for fire safety assessment , 2010 .

[3]  Benjamin Schröder,et al.  Multivariate Methods for Life Safety Analysis in Case of Fire , 2017 .

[4]  S. Gwynne,et al.  Employing the Hydraulic Model in Assessing Emergency Movement , 2016 .

[5]  Dorian Krause,et al.  JURECA: Modular supercomputer at Jülich Supercomputing Centre , 2018, Journal of large-scale research facilities JLSRF.

[6]  Harri Ehtamo,et al.  FDS+Evac: An Agent Based Fire Evacuation Model , 2010 .

[7]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  Menge: A Modular Framework for Simulating Crowd Movement , 2016 .

[8]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  The validation of evacuation simulation models through the analysis of behavioural uncertainty , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  A computer-based simulation model for the prediction of evacuation from mass-transport vehicles , 1994 .

[10]  Colleen Wade,et al.  A Room-Corner Fire Model Including Fire Growth On Linings and Enclosure Smoke-Filling: , 1996 .

[11]  Jose L. Torero,et al.  SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering , 2016 .

[12]  Eric Rosenbaum,et al.  Performance-Based Design , 2016 .

[13]  David A. Purser Developments in Tenability and Escape Time Assessment for Evacuation Modelling Simulations , 2016 .

[14]  Leonard Y. Cooper A concept for estimating available safe egress time in fires , 1983 .

[15]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  Smartfire: an Intelligent Cfd Based Fire Model , 1999 .

[16]  S. L. Poon,et al.  A Dynamic Approach to ASET/RSET Assessment in Performance based Design , 2014 .