Procedural Justice in Performance Evaluation: The Role of Instrumental and Non-Instrumental Voice in Performance Appraisal Discussions

This study examined the role of subordinate voice in creating positive attitudes in the performance appraisal context. Two aspects of voice, instrumental and non-instrumental, were assessed. Both aspects of voice were related to satisfaction with the appraisal, while only non-instrumental voice had an impact on attitudes toward the manager. Implications for procedural justice and performance appraisal are discussed.

[1]  Russell Cropanzano,et al.  Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management. , 1993 .

[2]  P. Sweeney,et al.  Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. , 1992 .

[3]  P. Sweeney,et al.  Research Notes. Distributive and Procedural Justice as Predictors of Satisfaction with Personal and Organizational Outcomes , 1992 .

[4]  William A. Pasmore,et al.  Participation, Individual Development, and Organizational Change: A Review and Synthesis , 1992 .

[5]  Barry R. Nathan,et al.  Interpersonal Relations as a Context For the Effects of Appraisal Interviews on Performance and Satisfaction: A Longitudinal Study , 1991 .

[6]  Kwok Leung,et al.  Psychological mechanisms of process-control effects. , 1990 .

[7]  R. Folger,et al.  Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions , 1989 .

[8]  Paul W. Paese,et al.  Procedural fairness and work group responses to performance evaluation systems , 1988 .

[9]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[10]  R. Cardy,et al.  The Effects of Purpose of Appraisal and Individual Differences in Stereotypes of Women on Sex Differences in Performance Ratings: A Laboratory and Field Study , 1988 .

[11]  P. Earley,et al.  Fairness and participation in evaluation procedures: Effects on task attitudes and performance , 1987 .

[12]  Robert Folger,et al.  Distributive and procedural justice in the workplace , 1987 .

[13]  Marian N. Ruderman,et al.  The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior , 1987 .

[14]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Conditions leading to value-expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models. , 1987 .

[15]  J. Loehlin Latent variable models , 1987 .

[16]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[17]  E. Lawler,et al.  Does salary discussion hurt the developmental performance appraisal , 1986 .

[18]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Fairness of Performance Evaluations , 1986 .

[19]  R. Folger Rethinking Equity Theory , 1986 .

[20]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Justice in social relations , 1986 .

[21]  M. Fields,et al.  Reactions to Varying Forms of Participation in the Appraisal Interview. , 1985 .

[22]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Trust-in-supervisor and perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluations , 1985 .

[23]  Ronald L. Cohen,et al.  Procedural Justice and Participation , 1985 .

[24]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Basic group processes , 1983 .

[25]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Procedural Justice, Participation, and the Fair Process Effect in Groups and Organizations , 1983 .

[26]  S. Carroll,et al.  Performance appraisal and review systems : the identification, measurement, and development of performance in organizations , 1982 .

[27]  Rene J. de Pontbriand,et al.  Correlates of Employee Reactions to Performance Appraisals and Appraisal Systems , 1981 .

[28]  Jeanette N. Cleveland,et al.  Perceived Fairness and Accuracy of Performance Evaluation: A Follow-Up. , 1980 .

[29]  J. Cook,et al.  New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non‐fulfilment , 1980 .

[30]  Kenneth N. Wexley,et al.  An exploration of the relationships between performance feedback interview characteristics and interview outcomes as perceived by managers and subordinates , 1979 .

[31]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Participation in Decision-Making: One More Look , 1979 .

[32]  Martin M. Greller,et al.  The Nature of Subordinate Participation in the Appraisal Interview , 1978 .

[33]  Ronald J. Burke,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF EFFECTIVE EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT INTERVIEWS: REPLICATION AND EXTENSION , 1978 .

[34]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation. , 1978 .

[35]  R. Folger Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of voice and improvement on experienced inequity. , 1977 .

[36]  H. Zeisel,et al.  Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis , 1978 .

[37]  M. Greller Subordinate participation and reactions to the appraisal interview. , 1975 .

[38]  Joseph M. Hillery,et al.  Participation effects in appraisal interviews conducted in a training situation. , 1974 .

[39]  R. Burke,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF EFFECTIVE EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT INTERVIEWS , 1969 .

[40]  R. Darlington,et al.  Multiple regression in psychological research and practice. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.