Multi-Level Evaluation of Cooperative Research Centers

Two emergent conceptual models for fostering the development of innovative technology through applied science at Cooperative Research Centers (CRCs) – the Triple Helix and the science of team science – have proved highly productive in stimulating research into how the innovation process works. Although the two arenas for fostering innovation have much in common, there has been relatively little synergy, or even interaction, between the researchers who study them. In this paper the authors discuss a programme of research that has attempted to blend the two, by shedding light on team processes within Triple Helix CRCs. They report findings from CRCs in relation to the comparative characteristics of single-scientist and multi-scientist, team-based partnerships; collaborative processes among CRC scientists, sometimes involving ‘serial’ collaboration; and the role of spatial factors in team-based processes. The paper also explores the possibilities for exploiting the synergies between Triple Helix and science of team science for public policy, innovative practices and future research.

[1]  Denis O. Gray Government-sponsored industry-university cooperative research: an analysis of cooperative research center evaluation approaches , 2000 .

[2]  Craig Boardman,et al.  The new science and engineering management: cooperative research centers as government policies, industry strategies, and organizations , 2010 .

[3]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm , 2000 .

[4]  Kara L Hall,et al.  The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[5]  T. Allen Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[6]  Umberto Cugini,et al.  From Geometric Modeling to Shape Modeling , 2002, IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing.

[7]  Denis O. Gray,et al.  Industry-University Projects and Centers , 1986 .

[8]  A. Rimoldi Simultaneous Product Development: The Move from Serial Collaboration to Parallel Co-Development , 2000, Workshop on Geometric Modeling.

[9]  B. Hillier,et al.  The Social Logic of Space , 1984 .

[10]  Denis O. Gray,et al.  Making team science better: Applying improvement‐oriented evaluation principles to evaluation of cooperative research centers , 2008 .

[11]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations , 2007 .

[12]  Kara L. Hall,et al.  The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[13]  Daniel Stokols,et al.  Toward a Science of Transdisciplinary Action Research , 2006, American journal of community psychology.

[14]  Umut Toker,et al.  Innovation spaces: Workspace planning and innovation in U.S. university research centers , 2008 .

[15]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.

[16]  Mark D Thornquist,et al.  The collaboration readiness of transdisciplinary research teams and centers findings from the National Cancer Institute's TREC Year-One evaluation study. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[17]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Universities and the global knowledge economy , 1997 .

[18]  Eric D. Sundstrom,et al.  Supporting work team effectiveness : best management practices for fostering high performance , 1999 .

[19]  Eric Sundstrom,et al.  Work Places: The Psychology of the Physical Environment in Offices and Factories , 1986 .