Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set

It is disputed whether onsets capture spatial attention either in a purely stimulus-driven fashion or only when they are contingent on one’s attentional set. According to the latter assumption, interference from irrelevant onsets may result from nonspatial filtering costs. In the present study, we used inhibition of return (IOR) as a marker for spatial attention. IOR occurs mainly for locations that attention has visited before. Participants searched for a red object among white objects. An attentional set for redness was demonstrated by a spatial validity effect of red cues on response times. However, a stronger validity effect was found for irrelevant white onsets, which slowed responses when the onset contained a distractor, but speeded them when the onset contained a target. Most importantly, this onset benefit for targets turned into a deficit at longer SOAs, indicating IOR. We conclude that onset distractors capture spatial attention regardless of the observer’s attentional set.

[1]  R. Remington,et al.  Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[2]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. , 1984 .

[3]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The cost of visual filtering. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Ulrich W. Weger,et al.  Attending to objects: Endogenous cues can produce inhibition of return , 2008 .

[5]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Volitional Covert Orienting to a Peripheral Cue Does Not Suppress Cue-induced Inhibition of Return , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  B. Gibson,et al.  Inhibition of return and attentional control settings , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  R. Remington,et al.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  What is top-down about contingent capture? , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Giovanni Berlucchi,et al.  Inhibition of return: A phenomenon in search of a mechanism and a better name , 2006, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[11]  J. Pratt,et al.  The role of attentional set on attentional cueing and inhibition of return , 2001 .

[12]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Irrelevant singletons capture attention: Evidence from inhibition of return , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[14]  P. Calabresi,et al.  Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  J. Pratt,et al.  The Spatial Distribution of Inhibition of Return , 2001, Psychological science.

[16]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  R. Remington,et al.  Top-down modulation of preattentive processing: Testing the recovery account of contingent capture , 2006 .

[18]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of return , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  S. Yantis,et al.  New objects dominate luminance transients in setting attentional priority. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Jay Pratt,et al.  Determining whether attentional control settings are inclusive or exclusive , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings II: Additivity is no evidence for filtering , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[22]  S. Tipper,et al.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. , 1994 .