Cognitive and neural markers of super-recognisers’ face processing superiority and enhanced cross-age effect

Super-recognisers inhabit the extreme high end of an adult face processing ability spectrum in the population. While almost all research in this area has evaluated those with poor or mid-range abilities, evaluating whether super-recognisers' superiority generates distinct electrophysiological brain activity, and transcends to different age group faces (i.e., children's) is important for enhancing theoretical understanding of normal and impaired face processing. It may also be crucial for policing, as super-recognisers may be deployed to operations involving child identification and protection. In Experiment 1, super-recognisers (n = 315) outperformed controls (n = 499) at adult and infant face recognition, while also displaying larger cross-age effects. These findings were replicated in Experiment 2 (super-recognisers, n = 19; controls, n = 28), although one SR with frequent infant exposure showed no cross-age effect. Compared to controls, super-recognisers also generated significantly greater electrophysiological activity in event-related potentials associated with pictorial processing (P1) and explicit recognition (P600). Experiment 3, employing an upright and inverted sequential matching design found super-recognisers (n = 24) outperformed controls (n = 20) at adult and infant face matching, but showed no upright cross-age matching effects. Instead, they displayed larger inversion effects, and cross-age inversion effects, implicating the role of holistic processing in their perceptual superiority. Larger cross-age effects in recognition, but not matching suggests that super-recognisers' adult face recognition is partly driven by experience. However, their enhanced infant face recognition suggest super-recognisers' superiority is also experience-independent, results that have implications for policing and for models of face recognition.

[1]  Sarah Bate,et al.  Socio-emotional functioning and face recognition ability in the normal population , 2010 .

[2]  Emanuela Bricolo,et al.  Do all kids look alike? Evidence for an other-age effect in adults. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  Lara J. Pierce,et al.  The N250 Brain Potential to Personally Familiar and Newly Learned Faces and Objects , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[5]  R. Cook,et al.  Developmental prosopagnosia , 2016, Current Biology.

[6]  Yifeng Zhou,et al.  Electrical Stimulation over Bilateral Occipito-Temporal Regions Reduces N170 in the Right Hemisphere and the Composite Face Effect , 2014, PloS one.

[7]  Ahmed M. Megreya,et al.  Individual differences in personality and face identification , 2013 .

[8]  Cheryl L. Dickter,et al.  EEG Methods for the Psychological Sciences , 2013 .

[9]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  The Empathy Quotient: An Investigation of Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High Functioning Autism, and Normal Sex Differences , 2004, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[10]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Rob Jenkins,et al.  Face Recognition by Metropolitan Police Super-Recognisers , 2016, PloS one.

[12]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Early and later experience with one younger sibling affects face processing abilities of 6-year-old children , 2013 .

[14]  Peter J. B. Hancock,et al.  Super‐recognisers in Action: Evidence from Face‐matching and Face Memory Tasks , 2015, Applied cognitive psychology.

[15]  Graham J Hole,et al.  Evidence for a contact-based explanation of the own-age bias in face recognition , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  Sarah Bate,et al.  An in-depth cognitive examination of individuals with superior face recognition skills , 2016, Cortex.

[17]  C. Tardif,et al.  Spatial Frequency and Face Processing in Children with Autism and Asperger Syndrome , 2004, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[18]  Ruosi Wang,et al.  Individual Differences in Holistic Processing Predict Face Recognition Ability , 2012, Psychological science.

[19]  E. Tulving,et al.  Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Denise C. Park,et al.  A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[21]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Super-recognizers: People with extraordinary face recognition ability , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  Matthew Q. Hill,et al.  Perceptual expertise in forensic facial image comparison , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger Syndrome/High-Functioning Autism, Malesand Females, Scientists and Mathematicians , 2001, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[24]  M. Eimer,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of face processing in developmental prosopagnosia: Neuropsychological and neurodevelopmental perspectives , 2012, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[25]  M. Eimer Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  What is a super-recogniser? , 2017 .

[27]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .

[28]  Short article: Why mix-ups don't happen in the nursery: Evidence for an experience-based interpretation of the other-age effect , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[29]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[30]  Sarah Bate,et al.  Eye-Movement Strategies in Developmental Prosopagnosia and “Super” Face Recognition , 2017, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[31]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Congenital prosopagnosia: face-blind from birth , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  V. M. Cassia,et al.  Early Experience Predicts Later Plasticity for Face Processing , 2009, Psychological science.

[33]  M. Viggiano,et al.  Individual differences in face processing captured by ERPs. , 2016, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[34]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  Activation of Preexisting and Acquired Face Representations: The N250 Event-related Potential as an Index of Face Familiarity , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  Jeremy Wilmer,et al.  Individual Differences in Holistic Processing Predict the Own-Race Advantage in Recognition Memory , 2013, PloS one.

[36]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Developmental prosopagnosia and super-recognition: No special role for surface reflectance processing , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  David A. Butz,et al.  Memory for own- and other-race faces: A dual-process approach , 2005 .

[38]  C. Joyce,et al.  The face-sensitive N170 and VPP components manifest the same brain processes: The effect of reference electrode site , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[39]  J. Brigham,et al.  Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review , 2001 .

[40]  Karen Lander,et al.  Famous face recognition, face matching, and extraversion , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[41]  Holger Wiese,et al.  Ageing faces in ageing minds: A review on the own-age bias in face recognition , 2013 .

[42]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[43]  Sarah Bate,et al.  The rehabilitation of face recognition impairments: a critical review and future directions , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[44]  Anna K. Bobak,et al.  Detecting Superior Face Recognition Skills in a Large Sample of Young British Adults , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[45]  Robert Plomin,et al.  Genetic specificity of face recognition , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  J. Brigham,et al.  The Influence of Race on Eyewitness Memory , 2007 .

[47]  Holger Wiese,et al.  Daily-life contact affects the own-age bias and neural correlates of face memory in elderly participants , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  A. Herlitz,et al.  Who are you looking at? The influence of face gender on visual attention and memory for own- and other-race faces , 2012, Memory.

[49]  V. M. Cassia Age biases in face processing: the effects of experience across development. , 2011 .

[50]  R. DeShon,et al.  Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. , 2002 .

[51]  Andrea Hildebrandt,et al.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of individual differences in face cognition: A replication and extension , 2014, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[52]  L. Bäckman,et al.  Recognition memory across the adult life span: The role of prior knowledge , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[53]  P. Garthwaite,et al.  Point and interval estimates of effect sizes for the case-controls design in neuropsychology: Rationale, methods, implementations, and proposed reporting standards , 2010, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[54]  David I. Donaldson,et al.  Dissociating recollection from familiarity: Electrophysiological evidence that familiarity for faces is associated with a posterior old/new effect , 2007, NeuroImage.

[55]  Trevor Thompson,et al.  EEG applications for sport and performance. , 2008, Methods.

[56]  Jia Liu,et al.  Extraversion predicts individual differences in face recognition , 2010, Communicative & integrative biology.

[57]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Holistic Processing Predicts Face Recognition , 2011, Psychological science.

[58]  Sarah Bate,et al.  Solving the Border Control Problem: Evidence of Enhanced Face Matching in Individuals with Extraordinary Face Recognition Skills , 2016, PloS one.

[59]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[60]  Josh P. Davis,et al.  Investigating predictors of superior face recognition ability in police super-recognisers , 2016 .

[61]  Holger Wiese,et al.  The role of age and ethnic group in face recognition memory: ERP evidence from a combined own-age and own-race bias study , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[62]  B. Balas,et al.  N170 face specificity and face memory depend on hometown size , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[63]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[64]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Electrophysiological markers of covert face recognition in developmental prosopagnosia. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[65]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  How experience shapes memory for faces: An event-related potential study on the own-age bias , 2013, Biological Psychology.

[66]  Allison B Sekuler,et al.  Holistic Processing Is Not Correlated With Face-Identification Accuracy , 2010, Psychological science.