Interrelation of the effects of binocular disparity and perspective cues on judgments of depth and height

The effects of binocular disparity (aniseikonia) and perspective cues operating together on judgments of depth and height were studied, both when these stimulus variables operated in the same direction and when they were in conflict. Both depth cues were effective upon the perception of depth and height. The effects of binocular disparity and perspective cues upon perceived depth were found to be additive. The effects of these depth cues upon perceived height showed some interaction in the sense that, operating together, the effect of the perspective cue was stronger than the separate effect of the perspective cue, both when binocular disparity and perspective cues operated in the same direction and when they were in conflict. This interactive effect increased with increasing strength of the perspective cues. The size-distance invariance hypothesis was confirmed under the present experimental conditions. By a causal analysis of inference, this invariant relation could be explained in the following way: both the perceived depth and the perceived height of the sides of the patterns were directly determined by binocular disparity and perspective cues, but the perceived height was also indirectly determined through change of perceived depth. A direct causal relation between perceived depth and perceived height was found.

[1]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  The validity of the size-distance invariance hypothesis with cue reduction , 1971 .

[2]  William Epstein,et al.  Size and distance judgments under reduced conditions of viewing , 1969 .

[3]  Tadasu Oyama,et al.  Perceived size and perceived distance in stereoscopic vision and an analysis of their causal relations , 1974 .

[4]  G S HARKER Interrelation of monocular and binocular acuities in the making of an equidistance judgment. , 1958, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[5]  Hubert M. Blalock,et al.  Four-Variable Causal Models and Partial Correlations , 1962, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  K. N. Ogle Researches in binocular vision. , 1950 .

[7]  William Epstein,et al.  Does retinal size have a unique correlate in perceived size? , 1969 .

[8]  H. Simon,et al.  Spurious Correlation: A Causal Interpretation* , 1954 .

[9]  Linear combinations of stereoscopic depth effects in dichoptic perception of gratings , 1978, Vision Research.

[10]  B. Gillam,et al.  Perception of slant when perspective and stereopsis conflict: experiments with aniseikonic lenses. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  W. Epstein,et al.  The effect of level of depth processing and degree of informational discrepancy on adaptation to uniocular image magnification. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  D JAMESON,et al.  Note on factors influencing the relation between stereoscopic acuity and observation distance. , 1959, Journal of the Optical Society of America.