Digital Twin Application for Model-Based DoE to Rapidly Identify Ideal Process Conditions for Space-Time Yield Optimization

The fast exploration of a design space and identification of the best process conditions facilitating the highest space-time yield are of great interest for manufacturers. To obtain this information, depending on the design space, a large number of practical experiments must be performed, analyzed, and evaluated. To reduce this experimental effort and increase the process understanding, we evaluated a model-based design of experiments to rapidly identify the optimum process conditions in a design space maximizing space-time yield. From a small initial dataset, hybrid models were implemented and used as digital bioprocess twins, thus obtaining the recommended optimal experiment. In cases where these optimum conditions were not covered by existing data, the experiment was carried out and added to the initial data set, re-training the hybrid model. The procedure was repeated until the model gained certainty about the best process conditions, i.e., no new recommendations. To evaluate this workflow, we utilized different initial data sets and assessed their respective performances. The fastest approach for optimizing the space-time yield in a three-dimensional design space was found with five initial experiments. The digital twin gained certainty after four recommendations, leading to a significantly reduced experimental effort compared to other state-of-the-art approaches. This highlights the benefits of in silico design space exploration for accelerating knowledge-based bioprocess development, and reducing the number of hands-on experiments, time, energy, and raw materials.

[1]  Astrid Dürauer,et al.  Hybrid modeling of cross-flow filtration: Predicting the flux evolution and duration of ultrafiltration processes , 2020 .

[2]  J. Smiatek,et al.  Towards a Digital Bioprocess Replica: Computational Approaches in Biopharmaceutical Development and Manufacturing. , 2020, Trends in biotechnology.

[3]  Gerald Striedner,et al.  Hybrid Modeling and Intensified DoE: An Approach to Accelerate Upstream Process Characterization , 2020, Biotechnology journal.

[4]  R. Dennis Cook,et al.  Cross-Validation of Regression Models , 1984 .

[5]  Robert Huber,et al.  Advanced online monitoring of cell culture off‐gas using proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry , 2014, Biotechnology progress.

[6]  A. Dürauer,et al.  Hybrid Modeling for Simultaneous Prediction of Flux, Rejection Factor and Concentration in Two-Component Crossflow Ultrafiltration , 2020 .

[7]  K. Bayer,et al.  Evaluation of three industrial Escherichia coli strains in fed-batch cultivations during high-level SOD protein production , 2013, Microbial Cell Factories.

[8]  A. Rathore,et al.  Quality by design for biopharmaceuticals , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  Alan D. Braem,et al.  An Example of Utilizing Mechanistic and Empirical Modeling in Quality by Design , 2010, Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation.

[10]  Carl-Fredrik Mandenius,et al.  Quality-by-design for biotechnology-related pharmaceuticals. , 2009, Biotechnology journal.

[11]  Bas Diepenbroek,et al.  Multivariate PAT solutions for biopharmaceutical cultivation: current progress and limitations. , 2014, Trends in biotechnology.

[12]  Ralf Pörtner,et al.  Model-assisted Design of Experiments as a concept for knowledge-based bioprocess development , 2019, Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering.

[13]  Wilfried Sihn,et al.  Digital Twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification , 2018 .

[14]  Gerald Striedner,et al.  Comparison of Modeling Methods for DoE based Holistic Upstream Process Characterization. , 2020, Biotechnology journal.

[15]  Carl-Fredrik Mandenius,et al.  Bioprocess optimization using design‐of‐experiments methodology , 2008, Biotechnology progress.

[16]  Jay H. Lee,et al.  Model predictive control: past, present and future , 1999 .

[17]  M. Rodrigues,et al.  Response surface analysis and simulation as a tool for bioprocess design and optimization , 2000 .

[18]  Gerald Striedner,et al.  Soft sensor based on 2D‐fluorescence and process data enabling real‐time estimation of biomass in Escherichia coli cultivations , 2019, Engineering in life sciences.

[19]  Alípio Mário Jorge,et al.  Ensemble approaches for regression: A survey , 2012, CSUR.

[20]  R. Grunow,et al.  A rapid and sensitive enzyme immunoassay for Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase with polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. , 1988, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[21]  Massimo Morbidelli,et al.  Bioprocessing in the Digital Age: The Role of Process Models , 2019, Biotechnology journal.

[22]  Kimberley B. McAuley,et al.  Using prior parameter knowledge in model‐based design of experiments for pharmaceutical production , 2020, AIChE Journal.

[23]  Sebastião Feyo de Azevedo,et al.  Hybrid semi-parametric modeling in process systems engineering: Past, present and future , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[24]  Carl-Fredrik Mandenius,et al.  Soft sensors in bioprocessing: a status report and recommendations. , 2012, Biotechnology journal.

[25]  Bogdan Gabrys,et al.  Data-driven Soft Sensors in the process industry , 2009, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[26]  Jürgen Hubbuch,et al.  Estimation of adsorption isotherm and mass transfer parameters in protein chromatography using artificial neural networks. , 2017, Journal of chromatography. A.

[27]  Gerald Striedner,et al.  The potential of random forest and neural networks for biomass and recombinant protein modeling in Escherichia coli fed‐batch fermentations , 2015, Biotechnology journal.

[28]  D. Gilmore,et al.  Statistical experimental design for bioprocess modeling and optimization analysis , 2006, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[29]  Rui Oliveira,et al.  Hybrid modeling for quality by design and PAT-benefits and challenges of applications in biopharmaceutical industry. , 2014, Biotechnology journal.

[30]  Moritz Stosch,et al.  Intensified design of experiments for upstream bioreactors , 2017, Engineering in life sciences.

[31]  T. Lundstedt,et al.  Experimental design and optimization , 1998 .

[32]  Gerald Striedner,et al.  Quality by control: Towards model predictive control of mammalian cell culture bioprocesses. , 2017, Biotechnology journal.

[33]  Gerald Striedner,et al.  Online prediction of product titer and solubility of recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli fed‐batch cultivations , 2015 .

[34]  Christoph Herwig,et al.  Model-Based Methods in the Biopharmaceutical Process Lifecycle , 2017, Pharmaceutical Research.

[35]  Rui M. C. Portela,et al.  Towards in silico Process Modeling for Vaccines. , 2021, Trends in biotechnology.

[36]  Oliver Spadiut,et al.  The impact of technical failures during cultivation of an inclusion body process , 2019, Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering.

[37]  René Schenkendorf,et al.  Model-based tools for optimal experiments in bioprocess engineering , 2018, Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering.

[38]  K. Bayer,et al.  Metabolic approaches for the optimisation of recombinant fermentation processes , 1999, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[39]  Krist V. Gernaey,et al.  Digital Twin in biomanufacturing: challenges and opportunities towards its implementation , 2021, Systems Microbiology and Biomanufacturing.