Relatedness through experience : on the importance of collected worker experiences for plant performance

The present article aims to show that multiple cognitive dimensions exist between employees in plants and that these multiple forms of potential cognitive relatedness interact in their influence on learning and plant performance. Because the success of a firm has come to be strongly associated with its ability to use the available resources (Penrose 1959), it has become increasingly important for firms to have just the right mix of competences. In the article, the knowledge and cognitive distance between employees in knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) is measured in multiple ways – as formal knowledge, industry experience and past knowledge exposure. The different forms of cognitive distance are entered into pooled OLS regressions with year-, industry-, region-fixed effects and interaction terms to estimate the effects of various forms of cognition on plant performance. The results suggest that past knowledge experiences and formal education offer multiple channels for knowledge integration at the workplace and that the specific labor force knowledge characteristics present at a plant condition learning. It has been further shown that the organizational structure and flexibility associated with single-plant and multi-plant firms, respectively, generate different plant performance outcomes of knowledge variety. Moreover, we conclude that the commonly found negative effects of similarity in formal education on plant performance may be reduced by high levels of similarity in historical knowledge exposure or industry experience. These effects are stronger in multi-plant firms than in single-plant firms. We also find that high levels of human capital exert a reducing influence on the negative effects of high levels of cognitive similarity.

[1]  Frank Neffke,et al.  Skill-relatedness and firm diversification , 2013 .

[2]  R. Boschma Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2005 .

[3]  R. Boschma,et al.  The impact of aging and technological relatedness on agglomeration externalities: a survival analysis , 2012 .

[4]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  DO FIRMS CHANGE CAPABILITIES BY HIRING NEW PEOPLE? A STUDY OF THE ADOPTION OF SCIENCE-BASED DRUG DISCOVERY , 2004 .

[5]  R. Boschma,et al.  The effect of intra- and inter-regional labour mobility on plant performance in Denmark: the significance of related labour inflows , 2014 .

[6]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[7]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Empirical Tests of Optimal Cognitive Distance , 2004 .

[8]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Related Variety, Trade Linkages, and Regional Growth in Italy , 2009 .

[9]  David L. Rigby,et al.  Technological variety, technological change and a geography of production techniques , 2006 .

[10]  S. K. Horwitz,et al.  The Effects of Team Diversity on Team Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review of Team Demography , 2007 .

[11]  P. Mohnen,et al.  Is inter-firm labor mobility a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidence from a linked employer--employee panel , 2009 .

[12]  R. Barras Towards a theory of innovation in services , 1986 .

[13]  Ron Boschma,et al.  The Dynamics of Agglomeration Externalities along the Life Cycle of Industries , 2011 .

[14]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[15]  K. Frenken,et al.  Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth , 2007 .

[16]  Kari Kristinsson,et al.  Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation , 2011 .

[17]  G. Becker,et al.  Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis , 1962, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  Rikard Eriksson,et al.  Localized mobility clusters: impacts of labour market externalities on firm performance , 2008 .

[19]  G. Heimeriks,et al.  The path- and place-dependent nature of scientific knowledge production in biotech 1986-2008 , 2014 .

[20]  M. Polanyi The Logic of Tacit Inference , 1966, Philosophy.

[21]  Ron Boschma,et al.  The dynamics of interfirm networks along the industry life cycle: The case of the global video game industry, 1987–2007 , 2013 .

[22]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances , 2001 .

[23]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Learning - by - Hiring: When Is Mobility More Likely to Facilitate Interfirm Knowledge Transfer? , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[24]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[25]  H. Bathelt,et al.  Institutional change in economic geography , 2014 .

[26]  Damian Hine,et al.  Deconstructing and reconstructing the capability hierarchy , 2014 .

[27]  Gabriel Szulanski Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[28]  U. Lindgren,et al.  Labour mobility and plant performance: on the (dis)similarity between labour‐ and capital‐intensive sectors for knowledge diffusion and productivity , 2013 .

[29]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[30]  K. Arrow Higher education as a filter , 1973 .

[31]  S. Breschi,et al.  Mobility of Skilled Workers and Co-Invention Networks: An Anatomy of Localized Knowledge Flows , 2009 .

[32]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity , 2007 .

[33]  Teis Hansen,et al.  Substitution or Overlap? The Relations between Geographical and Non-spatial Proximity Dimensions in Collaborative Innovation Projects , 2015 .

[34]  Markus C. Becker Organizational routines: a review of the literature , 2004 .

[35]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there) , 2003 .

[36]  M. Storper,et al.  Human geography and the institutions that underlie economic growth , 2011 .

[37]  J. Howells The geography of knowledge: never so close but never so far apart , 2012 .

[38]  Bo Wictorin Är kluster lönsamma? : En undersökning av platsens betydelse för företags produktivitet , 2007 .

[39]  Philippe Martin,et al.  Spatial concentration and plant-level productivity in France , 2011 .

[40]  Peter Maskell,et al.  Localized Learning and Industrial Competitiveness , 1995 .

[41]  B. Nooteboom A Cognitive Theory of the Firm , 2005 .

[42]  M. Spence Job Market Signaling , 1973 .

[43]  Patrick Cohendet,et al.  Geographies of Knowledge Formation in Firms , 2005 .

[44]  J.-C. Spender,et al.  Limits to learning from the west: How western management advice may prove limited in Eastern Europe , 1992 .

[45]  Peter Maskell,et al.  The Firm in Economic Geography* , 2001 .

[46]  Rikard Eriksson,et al.  Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 10 . 04 Localized Spillovers and Knowledge Flows : How Does Proximity Influence the Performance of Plants ? , 2010 .

[47]  Tore Sandven,et al.  Recruitment, knowledge integration and modes of innovation , 2015 .

[48]  Rikard Eriksson,et al.  How does labour mobility affect the performance of plants? The importance of relatedness and geographical proximity , 2008 .

[49]  Corporate Restructuring and Labor Productivity Growth , 2006 .

[50]  David L. Rigby,et al.  Who Benefits from Agglomeration? , 2015 .

[51]  R. Winter‐Ebmer,et al.  The Causal Effect of Education on Health , 2011 .

[52]  B. Nooteboom Governance and Competence , 2002 .