Blessings and Pitfalls of Harnessing Employee-Driven Innovation within a Work Model

The rising digitization changes the development processes of innovation in organizations. This provides employees the opportunity to take part in it. Even though their participation offers favorable opportunities, employees’ role as potential innovators has been mainly left unattended both in research and practice. By following examples such as Google’s “Innovation Time Off” and releasing employees temporarily from their regular work to develop new ideas, organizations’ can take a step in this direction. However, due to the existence of only few practical cases, limited knowledge exists on work models’ successful implementation for employee-driven innovation in general, and its drivers and barriers in particular. Thus, we have conducted a case study with an IT service provider implementing such a work model. Using the technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework as guiding lens, our results show that work models’ effectiveness increases with the presence of ‘innovation champions’ and that work models produce additional positive work-related outcomes.

[1]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[2]  Jennie Björk,et al.  Idea management systems for a changing innovation landscape , 2010 .

[3]  J. Jenssen,et al.  HOW DO CORPORATE CHAMPIONS PROMOTE INNOVATIONS , 2004 .

[4]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: A Review of Culture in Information Systems Research: Toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict , 2006, MIS Q..

[5]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2011 .

[6]  R. Gephart Qualitative Research and the Academy of Management Journal , 2004 .

[7]  Allen S. Lee A Scientific Methodology for MIS Case Studies , 1989, MIS Q..

[8]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[9]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Electronic business adoption by European firms: a cross-country assessment of the facilitators and inhibitors , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Guest editorial: qualitative studies in information systems: a critical review and some guiding principles , 2013 .

[11]  Jan Kees Looise,et al.  Innovation through exemptions: building upon the existing creativity of employees , 2002 .

[12]  R. G. Fichman,et al.  Digital Innovation as a Fundamental and Powerful Concept in the Information Systems Curriculum , 2014, MIS Q..

[13]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Employee�?Led Innovation , 2013 .

[14]  Jane M. Howell Individual differences, environmental scanning, innovation framing, and champion behavior: key predictors of project performance , 2001 .

[15]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Impactful Research on Transformational Information Technology: An Opportunity to Inform New Audiences , 2013, MIS Q..

[16]  K. Soderquist,et al.  Driving Innovation by Enhancing Employee Roles: The Balancing Act of Employee-Driven Innovation , 2016 .

[17]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World , 2017, MIS Q..

[18]  H. K. Tang,et al.  An integrative model of innovation in organizations , 1998 .

[19]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[20]  A. Gawer,et al.  Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation , 2013 .

[21]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks , 2016, Inf. Syst. J..