Conflict behavior and its influence on engineering design teams

Our work is investigating the nature and perceptions of team conflict from the student as well as the faculty perspective through the use of team observations, student and faculty surveys, as well as faculty interviews. In particular, we are interested in determining the most common types of conflicts among students as well as the conflict-management strategies they utilize. Questions asked in the surveys and interviews ranged from general evaluation of teamwork to student and faculty perceptions of productive conflict. The main conflicts that were reported in our study included conflicts of commitment, different ideas about the project direction as well as different working styles. Results from this research will enable us to rethink common models of team conflict and develop direct and indirect intervention strategies that can help students to better integrate emotion and intellect in engineering design and innovation.

[1]  G. Lynn,et al.  The Role of Personality in New Product Development Team Performance , 2002 .

[2]  Daniel D. Frey,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2006 .

[3]  Ann F. McKenna,et al.  IDEA: Formalizing the Foundation for an Engineering Design Education* , 2006 .

[4]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Results from a verbal protocol study of the design process , 1997, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1997 27th Annual Conference. Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change.

[5]  Mary F. Maples.  Group development: Extending tuckman's theory , 1988 .

[6]  Gary Gemmill,et al.  The Psychodynamics of Small Group Transformation , 1991 .

[7]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  IDEA: Implementing Design Throughout the Curriculum at Northwestern* , 2004 .

[8]  Stephen P. Robbins,et al.  Managing organizational conflict;: A nontraditional approach , 1974 .

[9]  Denny Davis,et al.  A Conceptual Model For Capstone Engineering Design Performance And Assessment , 2006 .

[10]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Personality and job performance: test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Problem-Based Learning Meets Case-Based Reasoning in the Middle-School Science Classroom: Putting Learning by Design(tm) Into Practice , 2003 .

[12]  K. Jehn.  A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in , 1997 .

[13]  Steven Beyerlein,et al.  Assessment Framework For Capstone Design Courses , 2006 .

[14]  S. Schulz-Hardt,et al.  Productive conflict in group decision making: genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking☆ , 2002 .

[15]  B. Tuckman.  DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  A Document Analysis Method for Characterizing Design Team Performance , 2004 .

[17]  Michael Song,et al.  Conflict management and innovation performance: An integrated contingency perspective , 2006 .

[18]  X. Song,et al.  Innovation Strategy and Sanctioned Conflict: A New Edge in Innovation? , 1998 .