Working at the “speed of trust”: pre-existing and emerging social ties in wildfire responder networks in Sweden and Canada

The frequency and severity of natural hazards are predicted to increase with climate change. Collaboration among actors across scales and organizational boundaries is essential to address this escalation. Pre-existing social networks are generally considered a catalyst enabling actors to more quickly address collective action problems. However, empirically derived knowledge about if, how, and why pre-established social networks facilitate effective collaborations in addressing natural hazards is scarce. We use survey data from crisis responders of large-scale wildfires in Sweden and Canada to investigate factors that shape actors’ (i) ability and willingness to form new social ties with other actors and (ii) propensity to “activate” pre-existing social ties. Our results show that many new social ties were established in both events, but also that pre-existing ties comprised a considerable proportion (54–82%) of all ties in use. Using exponential random graph models for temporal networks, we demonstrate that two actors that are working with or have previously worked with a common third actor are more likely to activate pre-existing social ties. Further, new social ties tend to be formed around a few central actors, whereas the opposite seems to apply for the activation of pre-existing ties. The extent to which actors consider others’ organizational affiliation, formal role, previous experience, and level of professionalization differs between the cases. We suggest these tie formation and activation differences can be attributed to diverging organizational contexts varying in their reliance upon self-organizing versus command-and-control approaches.

[1]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[2]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.

[3]  D. Shindell,et al.  Driving forces of global wildfires over the past millennium and the forthcoming century , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Ö. Bodin,et al.  Untangling the drivers of community cohesion in small-scale fisheries , 2018 .

[5]  C. Prell Social Network Analysis: History, Theory and Methodology , 2011 .

[6]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  T. Swetnam,et al.  Warming and Earlier Spring Increase Western U.S. Forest Wildfire Activity , 2006, Science.

[8]  E. Ostrom Understanding Institutional Diversity , 2005 .

[9]  K. Weick The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster , 1993 .

[10]  Jurian Edelenbos,et al.  The effects of boundary spanners on trust and performance of urban governance networks: findings from survey research on urban development projects in the Netherlands , 2012 .

[11]  Bruce V. Taylor,et al.  Partnership Networks for Urban Development: How Structure is Shaped by Risk , 2015 .

[12]  Ö. Bodin,et al.  Collective Action Problem Characteristics and Partner Uncertainty as Drivers of Social Tie Formation in Collaborative Networks , 2020, Policy Studies Journal.

[13]  P. Pattison,et al.  Small and Other Worlds: Global Network Structures from Local Processes1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  Ö. Bodin,et al.  Formation and performance of collaborative disaster management networks: Evidence from a Swedish wildfire response , 2016 .

[15]  Charles F. Parker,et al.  Managing Crises Collaboratively : Prospects and Problems - A Systematic Literature Review , 2018 .

[16]  Pavel N Krivitsky,et al.  A separable model for dynamic networks , 2010, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology.

[17]  Garry Robins,et al.  Exponential random graph models for social networks: theories, methods and applications , 2012 .

[18]  J. Minx,et al.  Climate Change 2014 : Synthesis Report , 2014 .

[19]  Toddi A. Steelman,et al.  Communication Under Fire: The Role of Embeddedness in the Emergence and Efficacy of Disaster Response Communication Networks , 2014 .

[20]  Ö. Bodin,et al.  Balancing Costs and Benefits of Collaboration in an Ecology of Games , 2018, Policy Studies Journal.

[21]  B. Crona,et al.  Legitimacy in Co-Management : The Impact of Preexisting Structures, Social Networks and Governance Strategies , 2014 .

[22]  F. Harary,et al.  STRUCTURAL BALANCE: A GENERALIZATION OF HEIDER'S THEORY1 , 1977 .

[23]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[24]  Saba Siddiki,et al.  Explaining Coordination in Collaborative Partnerships and Clarifying the Scope of the Belief Homophily Hypothesis , 2015 .

[25]  Sara B. Soderstrom,et al.  Dynamics of Dyads in Social Networks: Assortative, Relational, and Proximity Mechanisms , 2010 .

[26]  Anne-Lise K. Velez,et al.  The Structure of Effective Governance of Disaster Response Networks: Insights From the Field , 2018 .

[27]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[28]  Michael Howlett,et al.  Understanding the pre-conditions of commons governance: The role of network management , 2014 .

[29]  Martina Morris,et al.  ergm: A Package to Fit, Simulate and Diagnose Exponential-Family Models for Networks. , 2008, Journal of statistical software.

[30]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[31]  Garry Robins,et al.  Network structure and institutional complexity in an ecology of water management games , 2014 .

[32]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Insight, part of a Special Feature on Exploring Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems Shooting the Rapids: Navigating Transitions to Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems , 2006 .

[33]  A. Hastings,et al.  Network Governance for Invasive Species Management , 2017 .

[34]  G. Robins Doing Social Network Research: Network-based Research Design for Social Scientists , 2015 .

[35]  John T. Scholz,et al.  Self‐Organizing Policy Networks: Risk, Partner Selection, and Cooperation in Estuaries , 2010 .

[36]  Tyler A. Scott,et al.  Unpacking the Collaborative Toolbox: Why and When Do Public Managers Choose Collaborative Governance Strategies? , 2017 .

[37]  Ö. Bodin Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems , 2017, Science.

[38]  Adam Douglas Henry,et al.  Networks and the Challenge of Sustainable Development , 2014 .

[39]  K. WeiK. The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster , 2009, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[40]  Naota Hanasaki,et al.  Broad threat to humanity from cumulative climate hazards intensified by greenhouse gas emissions , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[41]  M. McPherson,et al.  BIRDS OF A FEATHER: Homophily , 2001 .

[42]  Salvatore Parise,et al.  Emergent network structure and initial group performance: The moderating role of pre-existing relationships , 2009 .

[43]  Louise K. Comfort,et al.  Self-Organization in Complex Systems , 1994 .

[44]  M. Fischer Collaboration patterns, external shocks and uncertainty: Swiss nuclear energy politics before and after Fukushima , 2015 .

[45]  J. Harrald Agility and Discipline: Critical Success Factors for Disaster Response , 2006 .

[46]  D. Nohrstedt Networking and Crisis Management Capacity: A Nested Analysis of Local-Level Collaboration in Sweden , 2018 .