Lexical familiarity and processing efficiency: individual differences in naming, lexical decision, and semantic categorization.

College students were separated into 2 groups (high and low) on the basis of 3 measures: subjective familiarity ratings of words, self-reported language experiences, and a test of vocabulary knowledge. Three experiments were conducted to determine if the groups also differed in visual word naming, lexical decision, and semantic categorization. High Ss were consistently faster than low Ss in naming visually presented words. They were also faster and more accurate in making difficult lexical decisions and in rejecting homophone foils in semantic categorization. Taken together, the results demonstrate that Ss who differ in lexical familiarity also differ in processing efficiency. The relationship between processing efficiency and working memory accounts of individual differences in language processing is also discussed.

[1]  J. Pellegrino,et al.  Hunting for individual differences in cognitive processes: Verbal ability and semantic processing of pictures and words , 1978 .

[2]  E. Hunt,et al.  Individual Differences in Cognition: A New Approach to Intelligence , 1973 .

[3]  J. Baron,et al.  Individual differences in speed of phonemic analysis, visual analysis, and reading. , 1975, Acta Psychologica.

[4]  C. Perfetti.  Verbal efficiency in reading ability. , 1988 .

[5]  D. Balota,et al.  The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? ☆ , 1985 .

[6]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words , 1991 .

[7]  C. A. Becker.  Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[8]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical Access and Naming Time. , 1973 .

[9]  G. C. Orden.  A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading , 1987 .

[10]  E. Hunt,et al.  Intelligence as an information-processing concept. , 1980, British journal of psychology.

[11]  John R. Frederiksen,et al.  Sources of Process Interactions in Reading. , 1981 .

[12]  John R. Frederiksen,et al.  A Componential Approach to Training Reading Skills , 1985 .

[13]  J. H. Neely,et al.  A dissociative word-frequency X levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[14]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[15]  Janet E. Davidson,et al.  Information processing correlates of reading , 1985, Journal of Memory and Language.

[16]  H. Nusbaum.  Sizing up the Hoosier Mental Lexicon: Measuring the Familiarity of 20,000 Words, Research on Speech Perception , 1984 .

[17]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[18]  D. Balota,et al.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  R. Sternberg.  Advances in the psychology of human intelligence , 1982 .

[20]  M Lansman,et al.  Individual differences in long-term memory access , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[21]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Processing determinants of reading speed. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[23]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Interactive Processes in Reading , 1981 .

[25]  M. Gernsbacher.  Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  Joe L. Lewis,et al.  What does it mean to be high verbal? , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  Ronald R. Schmeck,et al.  Individual differences in cognition , 1983 .

[28]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. , 1976 .

[29]  S. L. Ehrenreich,et al.  Structure and Search of the Internal Lexicon. , 1979 .

[30]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition , 1971 .

[31]  C. A. Becker.  Allocation of attention during visual word recognition. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading , 1974 .

[33]  Earl Hunt,et al.  On the nature of intelligence. , 1983, Science.

[34]  Paul A. Luce,et al.  Neighborhoods of Words in the Mental Lexicon. Research on Speech Perception. Technical Report No. 6. , 1986 .

[35]  John R. Frederiksen,et al.  A Componential Theory of Reading Skills and Their Interactions. , 1981 .

[36]  S. Andrews.  Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent? , 1982 .

[37]  D. Balota,et al.  A word’s meaning affects the decision in lexical decision , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[38]  James I. Brown.  The Nelson-Denny Reading Test. , 1960 .

[39]  G. Underwood.  Strategies of information processing , 1980 .

[40]  R W Schvaneveldt,et al.  An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect. , 1982, Psychological review.

[41]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[42]  S. Andrews.  Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? , 1989 .

[43]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual Differences in Integrating Information between and within Sentences. , 1983 .

[44]  David A. Balota.  Comprehension Processes in Reading. , 1990 .

[45]  C. Perfetti.  Individual Differences in Verbal Processes. , 1983 .

[46]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[47]  Michael C. Doyle,et al.  Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: where are they? , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[48]  Michael Garman,et al.  Psycholinguistics: Accessing the mental lexicon , 1990 .

[49]  G. E. MacKinnon,et al.  Reading Research Advances in Theory and Practice , 1985 .

[50]  John R. Frederiksen,et al.  A Componential Approach to Training Reading Skills: Part 1. Perceptual Units Training , 1985 .

[51]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[52]  K. Stanovich.  TOWARD AN INTERACTIVE-COMPENSATORY MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF READING FLUENCY , 1980 .

[53]  G. C. Orden,et al.  Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[54]  E. Hunt.  Mechanics of Verbal Ability. , 1978 .

[55]  C. T. James.  The Role of Semantic Information in Lexical Decisions. , 1975 .

[56]  C. Perfetti.  The Representation Problem in Reading Acquisition , 1992 .

[57]  M. Coltheart.  Lexical access in simple reading tasks , 1978 .

[58]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[59]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Exposure to print and orthographic processing. , 1989 .

[60]  M Coltheart,et al.  Children’s use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[61]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  The mechanism of suppression: a component of general comprehension skill. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[62]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: The cognitive correlates of print exposure , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[63]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[64]  S. Sternberg.  Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. , 1969, American scientist.