Occupational radiation exposure from C arm fluoroscopy during common orthopaedic surgical procedures and its prevention.

BACKGROUND Image intensifiers have become popular due to the concept of minimally invasive surgeries leading to decreasing invasiveness, decreased operative time, and less morbidity. The drawback, however, is an increased risk of radiation exposure to surgeon, patient and theatre staff. These exposures have been of concern due to their potential ability to produce biological effects. The present study was embarked upon to analyse the amount of radiation received by orthopedic surgeons in India using standard precautionary measures and also to bring awareness about the use of image intensifier safety in everyday practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twelve right-handed male orthopedic surgeons (4 senior consultants, 5 junior consultants and 3 residents) were included in a three month prospective study for radiation exposure measurement with adequate protection measures in all procedures requiring C Arm fluoroscopy. Each surgeon was provided with 5 Thermo Luminescent Dosimeter (TLD) badges which were tagged at the level of neck, chest, gonads and both wrists. Operative time and exposure time of each procedure was recorded. Exposure dose of each badge at the end of the study was obtained and the results were analysed. RESULTS Mean radiation exposure to all the parts were well within permissible limits. There was a significantly positive correlation between the exposure time and the exposure dose for the left wrist (r=0.735, p<0.01) and right wrist (r=0.58, p<0.05). The dominant hand had the maximum exposure overall. CONCLUSION Orthopaedic surgeons are not classified radiation workers. The mean exposure doses to all parts of the body were well within permissible limits. Nothing conclusive, however, can be said about the stochastic effects (chance effects like cancers). Any amount of radiation taken is bound to pose an additional occupational hazard. It is thus desirable that radiation safety precautions should be taken and exposures regularly monitored with at least one dosimeter for monitoring the whole-body dose.

[1]  L. Brateman The AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Radiation Safety Considerations for Diagnostic Radiology Personnel , 1999 .

[2]  D. Shaw,et al.  Scattered radiation during fixation of hip fractures-is distance alone enough protection , 2000, Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (Cat. No.00CH37143).

[3]  A A Giachino,et al.  Irradiation of the surgeon during pinning of femoral fractures. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  B. Browner,et al.  Radiation exposure to the surgeon during closed interlocking intramedullary nailing. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  L. Brateman Radiation safety considerations for diagnostic radiology personnel. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[6]  Lynn Rill,et al.  Radiation exposure with use of the mini-C-arm for routine orthopaedic imaging procedures. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  N. Theocharopoulos,et al.  Occupational exposure from common fluoroscopic projections used in orthopaedic surgery. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  M. Oddy,et al.  Ionising radiation exposure to orthopaedic trainees: the effect of sub-specialty training. , 2006, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[9]  R. Sanders,et al.  The effects, risks, and guidelines for radiation use in orthopaedic surgery. , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  C S Ahmad,et al.  Occupational hazards facing orthopedic surgeons. , 2012, American journal of orthopedics.

[11]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[12]  André A. Ribeiro,et al.  Exposure of the surgical team to ionizing radiation during orthopedic surgical procedures☆☆☆ , 2014, Revista brasileira de ortopedia.

[13]  N. Theocharopoulos,et al.  Image-guided Reconstruction of Femoral Fractures: Is the Staff Progeny Safe? , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  Jack Valentin,et al.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.

[15]  T. P. Barry Radiation Exposure to an Orthopedic Surgeon , 1984, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  D. Jones,et al.  Radiation use in the orthopaedic theatre: a prospective audit. , 1998, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.

[17]  M. Davis,et al.  Radiation exposure and associated risks to operating-room personnel during use of fluoroscopic guidance for selected orthopaedic surgical procedures. , 1983, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  S A Riley,et al.  Exposure of the orthopaedic surgeon to radiation. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  Rajesh Botchu,et al.  Radiation exposure from fluoroscopy during fixation of hip fracture and fracture of ankle: Effect of surgical experience , 2008, Indian journal of orthopaedics.

[20]  Giuseppe Mastrangelo,et al.  Increased cancer risk among surgeons in an orthopaedic hospital. , 2005, Occupational medicine.

[21]  Gordon Singer,et al.  Occupational Radiation Exposure to the Surgeon , 2005, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.