Short Term In Vivo Precision of Proximal Femoral Finite Element Modeling

AbstractAs more therapies are introduced to treat osteoporosis, precise in vivo methods are needed to monitor response to therapy and to estimate the gains in bone strength that result from treatment. A method for evaluating the strength of the proximal femur was developed and its short term reproducibility, or precision, was determined in vivo. Ten volunteer subjects aged 51–62 years (mean 55.6 years), eight women and two men, were examined using a quantitative computed tomography (QCT) protocol. They were positioned, scanned, re-positioned and re-scanned. The QCT images were registered in three-dimensional space, and finite element (FE) models were generated and processed to simulate a stance phase load configuration. Stiffness was computed from each FE model, and strength was computed using a regression equation between FE stiffness and fracture load for a small set n=6 of experimental specimens. The coefficients of variation (COV) and repeatability (COR=2.23* √2*COV) were determined. The COV for the FE fracture load computed was 1.85%, and the detectable limit (coefficient of repeatability) for serial measurements was 5.85%. That is, if a change of 5.85% or more in computed FE fracture load is observed, it will be too large to be consistent with measurement variation, but instead can be interpreted as a real change in the strength of the bone. The detectable limit of this method makes it suitable for serial research studies on changes in femoral bone strength in vivo. © 2000 Biomedical Engineering Society. PAC00: 8719Rr, 8759Fm, 8710+e

[1]  Mitchell M. Goodsitt,et al.  Standardized Methods for Measuring Diagnostic X-Ray Exposures , 1990 .

[2]  Dianna D. Cody,et al.  Interactive alignment and subtraction of two tomographic 3D imaging studies , 1993 .

[3]  R. Recker,et al.  Effect of Oral Alendronate on Bone Mineral Density and the Incidence of Fractures in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis , 1996 .

[4]  S. Cummings,et al.  Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures , 1996, The Lancet.

[5]  S. Chinn,et al.  The assessment of methods of measurement. , 1990, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  D. Cody,et al.  Femoral structure and stiffness in patients with femoral neck fracture , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[7]  M. Jergas,et al.  Accurate assessment of precision errors: How to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[8]  H K Genant,et al.  Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: precision and relation to bone strength. , 1997, Bone.

[9]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Predictive value of proximal femoral bone densitometry in determining local orthogonal material properties. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  J H Keyak,et al.  Validation of an automated method of three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone. , 1993, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[11]  G S Beaupré,et al.  Computer predictions of bone remodeling around porous-coated implants. , 1990, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  H. Skinner,et al.  Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  M. McClung Current bone mineral density data on bisphosphonates in postmenopausal osteoporosis. , 1996, Bone.

[15]  Harry B. Skinner,et al.  Automated three-dimensional finite element modeling of bone , 1987 .

[16]  W. Hayes,et al.  Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part I--Linear analysis. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[17]  V. Frankel,et al.  ANALYSIS OF FORCES PRODUCING FRACTURES OF THE PROXIMAL END OF THE FEMUR , 1960 .

[18]  D. Hans,et al.  Different Morphometric and Densitometric Parameters Predict Cervical and Trochanteric Hip Fracture: The EPIDOS Study , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[19]  Ego Seeman,et al.  Prevention of nonvertebral fractures by alendronate. A meta-analysis. Alendronate Osteoporosis Treatment Study Groups. , 1997, JAMA.

[20]  D R Shapiro,et al.  Prevention of nonvertebral fractures by alendronate. A meta-analysis. Alendronate Osteoporosis Treatment Study Groups. , 1997, JAMA.

[21]  L. S. Matthews,et al.  Stable fixation of intertrochanteric fractures. , 1974, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  L. S. Matthews,et al.  Proximal femoral bone density and its correlation to fracture load and hip-screw penetration load. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  W C Hayes,et al.  Fall severity and bone mineral density as risk factors for hip fracture in ambulatory elderly. , 1994, JAMA.

[24]  E. Barrett-Connor,et al.  Treatment with alendronate prevents fractures in women at highest risk: results from the Fracture Intervention Trial. , 1997, Archives of internal medicine.

[25]  A. LaCroix,et al.  Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures: results from the Fracture Intervention Trial. , 1998, JAMA.

[26]  W. C. Hayes,et al.  Stress distributions within the proximal femur during gait and falls: Implications for osteoporotic fracture , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[27]  C. Turner,et al.  Better discrimination of hip fracture using bone density, geometry and architecture , 1995, Osteoporosis International.

[28]  D P Fyhrie,et al.  Human vertebral body apparent and hard tissue stiffness. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  G. Ardran,et al.  Constancy of radiation output during diagnostic x-ray expousers. , 1978, British Journal of Radiology.