The crucial role of postcue encoding in directed forgetting and context-dependent forgetting.

People can intentionally forget previously studied material if, after study, a forget cue is provided and new material is learned. It has recently been suggested that such list-method directed forgetting arises because the forget cue induces a change in internal context and causes context-dependent forgetting of the studied material (L. Sahakyan & C. M. Kelley, 2002). The authors compared directed forgetting and context-dependent forgetting by examining whether, like a forget cue, a change in internal context needs subsequent learning of new material to be effective. Participants studied an item list and, after study, received a remember cue or a forget cue or their internal context was changed through an imagination task. In each condition, half the participants learned a second list, and the other half fulfilled an unrelated distractor task. Both the forget cue and the change in internal context induced forgetting of the first list only when learning of the second list was interpolated. These results suggest that postcue encoding of new material is crucial for both directed forgetting and (some forms of) context-dependent forgetting.

[1]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  On the puzzling relationship between environmental context and human memory. , 1989 .

[2]  Peter F. Delaney,et al.  Can encoding differences explain the benefits of directed forgetting in the list-method paradigm? , 2003 .

[3]  A. Benjamin The effects of list-method directed forgetting on recognition memory , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Hollyn M. Johnson,et al.  Processes of successful intentional forgetting. , 1994 .

[5]  K. Bäuml,et al.  2.13 – Inhibitory Processes , 2008 .

[6]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  WordGen: A tool for word selection and nonword generation in Dutch, English, German, and French , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[7]  J. Greenspoon,et al.  Stimulus conditions and retroactive inhibition. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  H. Roediger Cognitive psychology of memory , 2008 .

[9]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  Kent M. Dallett,et al.  Contextual stimuli and proactive inhibition , 1968 .

[11]  Jonathan M. Golding,et al.  Intentional forgetting: Interdisciplinary approaches. , 1998 .

[12]  Eric Eich,et al.  Context, memory, and integrated item/context imagery. , 1985 .

[13]  M. Conway,et al.  Disruption of Inhibitory Control of Memory Following Lesions to the Frontal and Temporal Lobes , 2003, Cortex.

[14]  J. Raaijmakers,et al.  A model for interference and forgetting , 1988 .

[15]  J. Eich The cue-dependent nature of state-dependent retrieval , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[16]  K. Bäuml,et al.  Inhibitory deficits in older adults: list-method directed forgetting revisited. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  R E Geiselman,et al.  Disrupted retrieval in directed forgetting: a link with posthypnotic amnesia. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  Jan Noyes,et al.  The disruption and dissolution of directed forgetting : Inhibitory control of memory , 2000 .

[19]  Celia B. Harris,et al.  Directed forgetting of recently recalled autobiographical memories. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  Angel Fernandez,et al.  Changing environmental context does not reliably affect memory , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[21]  P. F. Delaney,et al.  Directed forgetting in incidental learning and recognition testing: support for a two-factor account. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  R. Bjork Retrieval inhibition as an adaptive mechanism in human memory. , 1989 .

[23]  Colleen M. Kelley,et al.  A contextual change account of the directed forgetting effect. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  N. Spear,et al.  The effects of mood variation on state-dependent retention , 1984, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[25]  E. Tulving Elements of episodic memory , 1983 .

[26]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Processing in Human Memory , 1979 .

[27]  Stephen G. Gilligan,et al.  Emotional Mood as a Context for Learning and Recall. , 1978 .

[28]  L. R. Gottlob,et al.  Recall order determines the magnitude of directed forgetting in the within-participants list method , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[29]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  List Method Directed Forgetting: Return of the Selective Rehearsal Account , 2005 .

[30]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Positive forgetting: The noninterference of Items intentionally forgotten , 1970 .

[31]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Environmental context and human memory , 1978 .

[32]  Amanda Parker,et al.  The Effect of Environmental Context Manipulation on Memory: Dissociation Between Perceptual and Conceptual Implicit Tests , 1999 .

[33]  Eric Eich,et al.  Theoretical issues in state dependent memory. , 1989 .

[34]  A. Baddeley,et al.  When does context influence recognition memory , 1980 .

[35]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: on land and underwater. , 1975 .

[36]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  Dynamic cognitive processes , 2005 .

[37]  Gary J. Gargano,et al.  Directed forgetting in implicit and explicit memory tests: A comparison of methods. , 1993 .

[38]  N. Spear,et al.  State-dependent retention in humans induced by alterations in affective state , 1977 .

[39]  Colin M. Macleod The item and list methods of directed forgetting: Test differences and the role of demand characteristics , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.