How species traits and affinity to urban land use control large‐scale species frequency

Aim  Although urban areas only occupy c. 2.8% of the earth's land surface, urbanization threatens biodiversity as areas of high human population density often coincide with high biodiversity. Therefore, nature conservation should concentrate on both remote areas and densely populated regions. Protecting rare plant species in rural and urban areas can contribute to the protection of biodiversity. We therefore need to understand why species are rare. Studies on causes of rarity often concentrate on either plant traits or extrinsic threats (such as habitat fragmentation or nitrogen enrichment). However, there are only a few studies that combine traits and extrinsic threats, although such analyses might clarify causes of rarity. We assessed how the affinity of vascular plant species to urban land use (‘urbanity’) interacts with plant traits in determining species frequency.

[1]  M. Vilà,et al.  The comparative analysis of historical alien introductions , 2008, Biological Invasions.

[2]  D. Preston.  Engulfed by suburbia or destroyed by the plough: the ecology of extinction in Middlesex and Cambridgeshire , 2000 .

[3]  P. Poschlod,et al.  Urbanization causes shifts in species' trait state frequencies , 2008 .

[4]  P. Hulme.  Contrasting alien and native plant species–area relationships: the importance of spatial grain and extent , 2008 .

[5]  M. Kent,et al.  Urban plant ecology patterns and processes: a case study of the flora of the City of Plymouth, Devon, U. K. , 1999 .

[6]  Ian C. Laurie.  Nature in cities: The natural environment in the design and development of urban green space , 1979 .

[7]  Ruprecht Düll,et al.  Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa , 1992 .

[8]  P. Poschlod,et al.  Eutrophication and fragmentation are related to species’ rate of decline but not to species rarity: results from a functional approach , 2008, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[9]  I. Kühn,et al.  Challenging urban species diversity: contrasting phylogenetic patterns across plant functional groups in Germany. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[10]  Ingolf Kühn,et al.  Relating geographical variation in pollination types to environmental and spatial factors using novel statistical methods. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[11]  The Importance of Evaluating Rarity , 1995 .

[12]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Traits of British alien and native urban plants , 2008 .

[13]  H. Synge,et al.  The biological aspects of rare plant conservation , 2004, Vegetatio.

[14]  I. Kühn,et al.  Plant attributes determining the regional abundance of weeds on central European arable land , 2007 .

[15]  C. Römermann.  Patterns and processes of plant species frequency and life-history traits , 2006 .

[16]  K. McConway,et al.  Prediction of extinction in plants: interaction of extrinsic threats and life history traits. , 2007, Ecology.

[17]  R. M. Nally.  Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: The distinction between – and reconciliation of – ‘predictive’ and ‘explanatory’ models , 2000, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[18]  A. Gibon,et al.  Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: Environmental consequences and policy response , 2000 .

[19]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Biotic homogenization of the California flora in urban and urbanizing regions. , 2006 .

[20]  I. Kühn,et al.  The flora of German cities is naturally species rich , 2004 .

[21]  R. Bobbink,et al.  Restoration ecology of aquatic and terrestrial vegetation on non‐calcareous sandy soils in The Netherlands* , 1996 .

[22]  I. Kühn,et al.  Patterns of plant traits in annual vegetation of man-made habitats in central Europe , 2006 .

[23]  L. Walker,et al.  Ecosystems of Disturbed Ground , 1999 .

[24]  Michael A. McCarthy,et al.  Plant traits and local extinctions in natural grasslands along an urban–rural gradient , 2005 .

[25]  William G. Lee,et al.  Modulation of leaf economic traits and trait relationships by climate , 2005 .

[26]  I. Kühn,et al.  Plant distribution patterns in Germany – Will aliens match natives? , 2003 .

[27]  S. Godefroid,et al.  Urban plant species patterns are highly driven by density and function of built-up areas , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[28]  M. Araújo.  The coincidence of people and biodiversity in Europe , 2003 .

[29]  P. Poschlod,et al.  Databases on life history traits as a tool for risk assessment in plant species. , 2000 .

[30]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  Weighted averaging of species indicator values: Its efficiency in environmental calibration , 1986 .

[31]  W. Thuiller,et al.  Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[32]  D. Faith.  Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity , 1992 .

[33]  J. Chamie,et al.  World Urbanization Prospects: The 2003 Revision , 2004 .

[34]  I. Kühn,et al.  Urbanization and homogenization – Comparing the floras of urban and rural areas in Germany , 2006 .

[35]  Martin Hermy,et al.  The LEDA Traitbase: a database of life‐history traits of the Northwest European flora , 2008 .

[36]  Johan Ehrlén,et al.  DISPERSAL LIMITATION AND PATCH OCCUPANCY IN FOREST HERBS , 2000 .

[37]  M. Araújo,et al.  BIOMOD – a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions , 2009 .

[38]  W. Reid,et al.  Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2005 .

[39]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Generalized models vs. classification tree analysis: Predicting spatial distributions of plant species at different scales , 2003 .

[40]  A. Hampe.  Bioclimate envelope models: what they detect and what they hide , 2004 .

[41]  P. Poschlod,et al.  Predicting habitat distribution and frequency from plant species co‐occurrence data , 2007 .

[42]  I. Denholm,et al.  Some quantitative methods of assessing the conservation value of ecologically similar sites , 1985 .

[43]  R. Scholes,et al.  Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends , 2005 .

[44]  A. P. Schaffers,et al.  Reliability of Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, nitrogen and soil reaction: a comparison with field measurements , 2000 .

[45]  R. G. Davies,et al.  Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data : a review , 2007 .

[46]  Mark Williamson,et al.  The characters of successful invaders , 1996 .

[47]  C. Violle,et al.  Let the concept of trait be functional , 2007 .

[48]  C. Gries,et al.  Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  P. Poschlod,et al.  Dispersal failure contributes to plant losses in NW Europe. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[50]  W. Thuiller.  Biodiversity: Climate change and the ecologist , 2007, Nature.

[51]  I. Denholm,et al.  Monopolization of honeydew sources by Crematogaster macaoensis and its effects on lac production , 1985 .

[52]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[53]  G. Matlack.  Slow plants in a fast forest: local dispersal as a predictor of species frequencies in a dynamic landscape , 2005 .

[54]  W. D. Kissling,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation and the selection of simultaneous autoregressive models , 2007 .

[55]  P. Bocquier.  WORLD URBANIZATION PROSPECTS: AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE UN MODEL OF PROJECTION COMPATIBLE WITH URBAN TRANSITION THEORY 1 , 2005 .

[56]  T. Oke.  The energetic basis of the urban heat island , 1982 .

[57]  M. Diekmann.  Species indicator values as an important tool in applied plant ecology – a review , 2003 .

[58]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Human Population Density and Extinction Risk in the World's Carnivores , 2004, PLoS biology.

[59]  W. Kunin,et al.  Extrapolating species abundance across spatial scales , 1998, Science.

[60]  BiolFlor — a new plant‐trait database as a tool for plant invasion ecology , 2004 .