Displacement noise from back scattering and specular reflection of input optics in advanced gravitational wave detectors.

The second generation of ground-based interferometric gravitational wave detectors are currently being built and installed. They are designed to be better in strain sensitivity by about a factor 10 with respect to the first generation. Light originating from the laser and following unintended paths, called stray light, has been a major problem during the commissioning of all of the first generation detectors. Indeed, stray light carries information about the phase of the emitting object. Therefore, in the next generation all the optics will be suspended in the vacuum in order to mitigate their associated stray light displacement noise. Despite this additional precaution, the challenging target sensitivity at low frequency which is partially limited by quantum radiation pressure combined with up-conversion effects, requires more detailed investigation. In this paper, we turn our attention to stray light originating from auxiliary optical benches. We use a dedicated formalism to compute the re-coupling of back-reflected and back-scattered light. We show, in particular, how much care should be taken in designing and setting requirements for the input bench optics.

[1]  Guido Mueller,et al.  Back-reflection from a Cassegrain telescope for space-based interferometric gravitational-wave detectors , 2012 .

[2]  N. Leroy,et al.  Noise studies during the first Virgo science run and after , 2008 .

[3]  Characterization of the Virgo seismic environment , 2011, 1108.1598.

[4]  M. Loupias,et al.  Virgo: a laser interferometer to detect gravitational waves , 2012 .

[5]  E. Church Fractal surface finish. , 1988, Applied optics.

[6]  K. Arai,et al.  Direct measurement of the scattered light effect on the sensitivity in TAMA300 , 2003 .

[7]  Peter Fritschel,et al.  Impact of upconverted scattered light on advanced interferometric gravitational wave detectors. , 2012, Optics express.

[8]  A. Duparré,et al.  Surface characterization techniques for determining the root-mean-square roughness and power spectral densities of optical components. , 2002, Applied optics.

[9]  J. Stover Optical Scattering: Measurement and Analysis , 1990 .

[10]  A. Freise,et al.  DC-readout of a signal-recycled gravitational wave detector , 2008, 0811.3242.

[11]  Z.Zhang,et al.  Inertial control of the mirror suspensions of the VIRGO interferometer for gravitational wave detection , 2001, gr-qc/0105110.

[12]  Brisson,et al.  Scattered light noise in gravitational wave interferometric detectors: Coherent effects. , 1996, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[13]  S. Hild Beyond the First Generation: Extending the Science Range of the Gravitational Wave Detector GEO600 , 2007 .

[14]  A. Rudiger,et al.  A method to blot out scattered light effects and its application to a gravitational wave detector , 1981 .

[15]  A J Leistner,et al.  Power spectral density analysis of optical substrates for gravitational-wave interferometry. , 1999, Applied optics.

[16]  Joshua R. Smith,et al.  LIGO: the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory , 1992, Science.

[17]  Vincent Loriette,et al.  The Virgo 3 km interferometer for gravitational wave detection , 2008 .

[18]  E. Wright,et al.  Theory of radiation-pressure-driven interferometers , 1985 .

[19]  G. Nelson,et al.  An analysis of scattered light in reflecting and refracting primary objectives for coronagraphs , 2007 .

[20]  L. Pinard,et al.  Scattered light noise in gravitational wave interferometric detectors: A statistical approach , 1997 .

[21]  D. Farrant,et al.  Fabrication and measurement of optics for the laser interferometer gravitational wave observatory. , 1999, Applied optics.

[22]  D. Reitze,et al.  Dual-recycled cavity-enhanced Michelson interferometer for gravitational-wave detection. , 2003, Applied Optics.