An actor dependency model of organizational work: with application to business process reengineering

In developing information systems for use in an organization, one often needs to understand the reasons that underlie established work patterns and practices. Because organizational actors depend on each other for goals to be achieved, tasks to be performed, and resources to be furnished, reasons for work patterns can be revealed by examining the dependencies among actors. We present a model which characterizes a work organization in terms of the network of dependencies among organizational actors. Actor dependencies are taken to be intentional – they expand or restrict an actor’s ability to pursue goals. The network of actor dependencies constitutes the intentional structure of the organization. We use examples from business process reengineering to motivate and illustrate the model.

[1]  August-Wilhelm Scheer Enterprise-Wide Data Modelling: Information Systems in Industry , 1990 .

[2]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Information systems and organizational change , 1990, CACM.

[3]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Paradigm shift: The new promise of information technology: Don Tapscott and Art Caston McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, 1993, 337 pp. £21.95 ISBN 0-07-062857-2 , 1992, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Y. Lespérance A formal theory of indexical knowledge and action , 1992 .

[5]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Modeling Coordination in Organizations and Markets , 1987 .

[6]  Nils J. Nilsson,et al.  Principles of Artificial Intelligence , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  Intention is Choice with Commitment , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[8]  August-Wilhelm Scheer,et al.  Enterprise-Wide Data Modelling , 1989 .

[9]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  Representing and Using Nonfunctional Requirements: A Process-Oriented Approach , 1992, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[10]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Preliminary thoughts on an agent description language , 1991, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[11]  E. Dubois,et al.  A knowledge representation language for requirements engineering , 1986, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[12]  Eric S. K. Yu An Organization Modelling Framework for Multi-Perspective Information System Design , 1993 .

[13]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology , 1992 .

[14]  GasserLes The integration of computing and routine work , 1986 .

[15]  Matthias Jarke,et al.  Telos: representing knowledge about information systems , 1990, TOIS.

[16]  Michael Hammer,et al.  Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate , 1990 .

[17]  Les Gasser,et al.  The integration of computing and routine work , 1986, TOIS.

[18]  Janis A. Bubenko,et al.  Information Modeling in the Context of System Development , 1980, IFIP Congress.

[19]  Frederick H. Lochovsky,et al.  An object-oriented model for supporting office work , 1988 .

[20]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Office procedure as practical action: models of work and system design , 1983, TOIS.

[21]  S. Peter de Jong,et al.  Ubik-a framework for the development of distributed organizations , 1989 .

[22]  E. Yu An Organization Modelling Framework for Information Systems Requirements Engineering (Extended Abstract) , 1993 .

[23]  Eric S. K. Yu,et al.  Modeling organizations for information systems requirements engineering , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering.

[24]  Jintae Lee,et al.  What's in design rationale? , 1991 .

[25]  Rob Kling,et al.  Defining the boundaries of computing across complex organizations , 1987 .

[26]  Peter G.W. Keen,et al.  Shaping the Future: Business Design Through Information Technology , 1991 .

[27]  H. Harrington Business process improvement : the breakthrough strategy for total quality, productivity, and competitiveness , 1991 .

[28]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  Knowledge Representation as the Basis for Requirements Specifications , 1985, Computer.

[29]  Sol Jaffe Greenspan,et al.  Requirements modeling: a knowledge representation approach to software requirements definition , 1984 .

[30]  Matthias Jarke,et al.  DAIDA: an environment for evolving information systems , 1992, TOIS.

[31]  T. A. Stewart The search for the organization of tomorrow. , 1992, Fortune.