The efficacy of a computerized caries detector in intraoral digital radiography.

BACKGROUND A unique software tool has been developed to assist dentists in the difficult task of diagnosing radiographs for proximal caries. The software, called Logicon Caries Detector (Northrop Grumman Information Technology, Herndon, Va.), extracts image features and correlates them with a database of known caries problems. The Logicon software was combined with the digital radiography system Trophy RadioVisioGraphy (Trophy Radiologie, Croissy-Beaubourg, France) and its effectiveness was measured in a clinical study, the results of which are reported here. METHODS The manufacturer trained 18 dentists in private practices and one university clinic across the United States to use the Logicon Caries Detector software. The dentists diagnosed 175 surfaces with potential caries and adjacent teeth expected to be clean but included as control surfaces. The dentists first did a visual diagnosis only and then repeated the diagnosis using the software. If their final diagnosis called for it, a restoration was performed and the depth of caries was recorded. RESULTS Effectiveness was gauged by calculating three measures of performance-sensitivity, specificity and accuracy-for dentin caries diagnosis by each dentist both before and after using Logicon Caries Detector. Sensitivity among all dentists before using the Logicon software was 70.3 percent and afterward was 90.5 percent, an improvement of 20.2 percent. Dentists' specificity was 88.6 percent before using the software and 88.3 percent afterward, with a difference of-0.3 percent. Dentists' accuracy was 75.6 percent before using the software and 88.3 percent afterward, with an improvement of 12.7 percent. CONCLUSIONS Logicon Caries Detector enabled dentists to find 20 percent more cases of caries penetrating into dentin than they were able to find without it, while not causing them to mistreat any additional healthy teeth. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Digital radiography and smart software like Logicon Caries Detector will improve dentists' diagnostic abilities and lead to better patient care.

[1]  R. Plackett,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Analysis. , 1952 .

[2]  G. Seward,et al.  Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation , 1982 .

[3]  P. Mileman,et al.  Variation in radiographic caries diagnosis and treatment decisions among university teachers. , 1982, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[4]  P. Mileman,et al.  Effect of variation in caries diagnosis and degree of caries on treatment decisions by dental teachers using bitewing radiographs. , 1983, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[5]  J. Boffa,et al.  Reliability of coding depth of approximal carious lesions from non-independent interpretation of serial bitewing radiographs. , 1984, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[6]  L Hollender,et al.  Comparison of xeroradiographs and film for detection of proximal surface caries. , 1984, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[7]  N B Pitts,et al.  Detection and measurement of approximal radiolucencies by computer-aided image analysis. , 1984, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[8]  H. Gröndahl,et al.  Accuracy at radiography and probing for the diagnosis of proximal caries. , 1985, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[9]  Nuttall Nm,et al.  The analysis of inter-dentist agreement in caries prevalence studies. , 1985 .

[10]  N B Pitts,et al.  Reproducibility of Computer-aided Image-analysis-derived Estimates of the Depth and Area of Radiolucencies in Approximal Enamel , 1985, Journal of dental research.

[11]  N. Nuttall,et al.  The analysis of inter-dentist agreement in caries prevalence studies. , 1985, Community dental health.

[12]  N. Pitts,et al.  Further development of a computer-aided image analysis method of quantifying radiolucencies in approximal enamel. , 1986, Caries research.

[13]  N. Pitts,et al.  Image analysis of bitewing radiographs , 1986 .

[14]  A. Tveit,et al.  Clinical and radiographic assessment of approximal carious lesions. , 1986, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[15]  B. McNeil,et al.  Examiner Reliability in Dental Radiography , 1986, Journal of dental research.

[16]  N. Pitts.  Detection of approximal radiolucencies in enamel: a preliminary comparison between experienced clinicians and an image analysis method. , 1987, Journal of dentistry.

[17]  L. K. Bandlish.  Monitoring the behaviour of posterior approximal carious lesions by image analysis of serial standardised bitewing radiographs' , 1987, British Dental Journal.

[18]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[19]  A. Firestone,et al.  Quantitative Radiographic Measurement of Dentinal Lesions , 1990, Journal of dental research.

[20]  A. Firestone,et al.  Computer-based Image Analysis of Natural Approximal Caries on Radiographic Films , 1992, Journal of dental research.

[21]  R A Weems,et al.  The use of a computer-based image analysis program for the diagnosis of approximal caries from bitewing radiographs. , 1994, Caries research.

[22]  H. Tsuda,et al.  FLUORESCENT DYE DISTRIBUTION IN IN-VITRO HUMAN ROOT CARIOUS LESIONS , 1994 .

[23]  R C Duncan,et al.  Using computers to diagnose and plan treatment of approximal caries. Detected in radiographs. , 1995, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[24]  S. White,et al.  Comparative performance of digital and conventional images for detecting proximal surface caries. , 1997, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[25]  A Wenzel,et al.  Digital radiography and caries diagnosis. , 1998, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[26]  A Wenzel,et al.  Computer–Automated Caries Detection in Digital Bitewings: Consistency of a Program and Its Influence on Observer Agreement , 2000, Caries Research.