Evaluation of Three Long Time Series for Global Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR) Products

The fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FAPAR) is a critical input parameter in many climate and ecological models. Long time series of global FAPAR products are required for many applications, such as vegetation productivity, carbon budget calculations, and global change studies. Three long time series of global FAPAR products have been existing since the 1980s: Global LAnd Surface Satellite (GLASS) Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR), National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) AVHRR, and third-generation Global Inventory Monitoring and Modeling System (GIMMS3g). Currently, no intercomparison studies exist that have evaluated these FAPAR products to understand their differences for effective applications. In this paper, these three long time series of global FAPAR products are first intercompared to evaluate their spatial and temporal consistencies, and then compared with FAPAR values derived from high-resolution reference maps of VAlidation of Land European Remote sensing Instruments sites. Our results demonstrate that the GLASS AVHRR FAPAR product is spatially complete, whereas the NCEI AVHRR and GIMMS3g FAPAR products contain many missing pixels, especially in rainforest regions and in middle- and high-latitude zones of the Northern Hemisphere. The GLASS AVHRR, NCEI AVHRR, and GIMMS3g FAPAR products are generally consistent in their spatial patterns. However, a relatively large discrepancy among these FAPAR products is observed in tropical forest regions and around 55°N–65°N. In latitudes between 15°N and 25°N, the mean GIMMS3g FAPAR values are clearly larger than the mean GLASS AVHRR and NCEI AVHRR FAPAR values during July–October each year. The GLASS AVHRR FAPAR product provides smooth FAPAR temporal profiles, whereas the NCEI AVHRR and GIMMS3g FAPAR products showed fluctuating trajectories, especially during the growing seasons. All three FAPAR products show high agreement coefficients (ACs) in vegetation regions with obvious seasonal variations and low ACs in tropical forest regions and sparsely vegetated areas. A comparison of these FAPAR products with the FAPAR values derived from high-resolution reference maps demonstrates that the GLASS AVHRR FAPAR product has the best performance [root mean square deviation (RMSD) = 0.0819 and bias = 0.0043], followed by the NCEI AVHRR FAPAR product (RMSD = 0.1061 and bias = 0.0371), and then finally, the GIMMS3g FAPAR product (RMSD = 0.1152 and bias = 0.0248).

[1]  N. Gobron,et al.  Evaluation of the MERIS/ENVISAT FAPAR product , 2007 .

[2]  F. Baret,et al.  LAI and fAPAR CYCLOPES global products derived from VEGETATION. Part 2: validation and comparison with MODIS collection 4 products , 2007 .

[3]  Jindi Wang,et al.  Estimating the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation from the MODIS data based GLASS leaf area index product , 2015 .

[4]  Nadine Gobron,et al.  A global vegetation index for SeaWiFS: Design and applications , 2001 .

[5]  Jindi Wang,et al.  Long-Time-Series Global Land Surface Satellite Leaf Area Index Product Derived From MODIS and AVHRR Surface Reflectance , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  Christopher O. Justice,et al.  A 30+ Year AVHRR LAI and FAPAR Climate Data Record: Algorithm Description and Validation , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[7]  S. Running,et al.  Global products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of MODIS data , 2002 .

[8]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  GEOV1: LAI and FAPAR essential climate variables and FCOVER global time series capitalizing over existing products. Part1: Principles of development and production , 2013 .

[9]  L. Ji,et al.  An Agreement Coefficient for Image Comparison , 2006 .

[10]  B. Choudhury,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity in vegetation canopies and remote sensing of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation: A modeling study , 1992 .

[11]  F. Baret,et al.  Neural network estimation of LAI, fAPAR, fCover and LAI×Cab, from top of canopy MERIS reflectance data : Principles and validation , 2006 .

[12]  F. Baret,et al.  GEOV1: LAI, FAPAR essential climate variables and FCOVER global time series capitalizing over existing products. Part 2: Validation and intercomparison with reference products , 2013 .

[13]  R. Dickinson,et al.  Comparison of seasonal and spatial variations of leaf area index and fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Common Land Model , 2004 .

[14]  Nuno Carvalhais,et al.  Comparative analysis of MODIS-FAPAR and MERIS-MGVI datasets: potential impacts on ecosystem modeling. , 2009 .

[15]  Aleixandre Verger,et al.  ntercomparison and quality assessment of MERIS , MODIS and SEVIRI FAPAR roducts over the Iberian Peninsula , 2012 .

[16]  M. Claverie,et al.  Validation of coarse spatial resolution LAI and FAPAR time series over cropland in southwest France , 2013 .

[17]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Direct and Indirect Estimation of Leaf Area Index, fAPAR, and Net Primary Production of Terrestrial Ecosystems , 1999 .

[18]  J. Townshend,et al.  A long-term Global LAnd Surface Satellite (GLASS) data-set for environmental studies , 2013 .

[19]  S. Running,et al.  Synergistic algorithm for estimating vegetation canopy leaf area index and fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active , 1998 .

[20]  J. Canadell,et al.  Evaluation of six satellite-derived Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetic Active Radiation (FAPAR) products across the Australian continent , 2014 .

[21]  R. Fensholt,et al.  Evaluating temporal consistency of long-term global NDVI datasets for trend analysis , 2015 .

[22]  Jindi Wang,et al.  Use of General Regression Neural Networks for Generating the GLASS Leaf Area Index Product From Time-Series MODIS Surface Reflectance , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[23]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  Time‐series validation of MODIS land biophysical products in a Kalahari woodland, Africa , 2005 .

[24]  S. Liang,et al.  Assessment of five global satellite products of fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation: Intercomparison and direct validation against ground-based data , 2015 .

[25]  E. Ridao,et al.  Estimating fAPAR from nine vegetation indices for irrigated and nonirrigated faba bean and semileafless pea canopies , 1998 .

[26]  Alessandro Anav,et al.  Global Data Sets of Vegetation Leaf Area Index (LAI)3g and Fraction of Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FPAR)3g Derived from Global Inventory Modeling and Mapping Studies (GIMMS) Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI3g) for the Period 1981 to 2011 , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[27]  A. Samanta,et al.  Comment on “Drought-Induced Reduction in Global Terrestrial Net Primary Production from 2000 Through 2009” , 2011, Science.

[28]  R. Fensholt,et al.  Evaluation of MODIS LAI, fAPAR and the relation between fAPAR and NDVI in a semi-arid environment using in situ measurements , 2004 .

[29]  N. Gobron,et al.  The MERIS Global Vegetation Index (MGVI): Description and preliminary application , 1999 .

[30]  S. Nilsson,et al.  Comparison of four global FAPAR datasets over Northern Eurasia for the year 2000 , 2010 .

[31]  S. Gower,et al.  Spatial and temporal validation of the MODIS LAI and FPAR products across a boreal forest wildfire chronosequence , 2013 .

[32]  N. Coops,et al.  Intercomparison of fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation products derived from satellite data over Europe , 2014 .

[33]  O. Hagolle,et al.  LAI, fAPAR and fCover CYCLOPES global products derived from VEGETATION: Part 1: Principles of the algorithm , 2007 .