Treatment of children with progressive or recurrent brain tumors with carboplatin or iproplatin: a Pediatric Oncology Group randomized phase II study.

PURPOSE The Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) conducted a randomized phase II study to evaluate the activity of carboplatin and iproplatin in children with progressive or recurrent brain tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study was designed to evaluate the activity of these agents and to compare the toxicities associated with their use. Treatment consisted of carboplatin 560 mg/m2 at 4-week intervals or iproplatin 270 mg/m2 at 3-week intervals. RESULTS The major toxicity observed was myelosuppression, particularly thrombocytopenia, for both agents. Ototoxicity (grade 1 or 2) was seen in 2.5% of patients treated with carboplatin and 1.3% of patients treated with iproplatin. The majority of patients with low-grade astrocytic neoplasms treated with carboplatin (nine of 12 patients) or iproplatin (eight of 12 patients) demonstrated tumor response or prolonged stable disease that persisted off-therapy. The duration of stable disease produced by carboplatin was particularly striking, ranging from 2 months to 68 + months (median, 40 + months). Neither drug demonstrated appreciable activity in the treatment of medulloblastoma (two of 26 responses to carboplatin, one of 14 responses to iproplatin), ependymoma (two of 17 responses to carboplatin, none of seven responses to iproplatin), high-grade glioma (two of 19 responses to carboplatin, one of 14 responses to iproplatin), or brain-stem tumors (one of 23 responses to carboplatin, none of 14 responses to iproplatin). CONCLUSION Carboplatin is active against low-grade gliomas. Further evaluation of the role of carboplatin in the preirradiation treatment of children with low-grade gliomas of the optic pathway is currently underway in a clinical trial.

[1]  P. Gaynon,et al.  Prolonged response to carboplatin in an infant with brain stem glioma , 1991, Cancer.

[2]  N. Tarbell,et al.  Ototoxicity of preradiation cisplatin for children with central nervous system tumors. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  W. J. Oakes,et al.  Treatment of patients with recurrent gliomas with cyclophosphamide and vincristine. , 1990, Journal of neurosurgery.

[4]  R. Mulhern,et al.  Preirradiation cisplatin and etoposide in the treatment of high-risk medulloblastoma and other malignant embryonal tumors of the central nervous system: a phase II study. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  A. Donfrancesco,et al.  High-dose carboplatin in combination with etoposide (JET regimen) for childhood brain tumors. , 1990, The American journal of pediatric hematology/oncology.

[6]  M. Schell,et al.  Hearing loss in children and young adults receiving cisplatin with or without prior cranial irradiation. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  J. Allen,et al.  Cisplatin in the treatment of recurrent childhood primary brain tumors. , 1988, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  P. Gaynon,et al.  Pediatric phase I trial of carboplatin: a Childrens Cancer Study Group report. , 1987, Cancer treatment reports.

[9]  J. Allen,et al.  Carboplatin and recurrent childhood brain tumors. , 1987, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  B. Issell,et al.  New platinum complexes in clinical trials. , 1983, Cancer treatment reviews.