A Pragmatic Protocol for Reduction in the Metal Artifact and Radiation Dose in Multislice Computed Tomography of the Spine: Cadaveric Evaluation after Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement

Objective: To assess the correlation between the metal artifact degree and the tube voltage (in peak kilovolts; kVp) and tube current (in milliamperes; mA) in multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) and evaluate the proper protocols for reduction in the metal artifact and the radiation dose. Methods: We performed MDCT examinations for 13 cadavers operated for transpedicular screw insertion from C3 to C7, bilaterally. We used 80, 100, and 120 kVp in all cadavers. For the mA, we arbitrarily applied 100, 150, and 200 in 6 cadavers (experiment 1); 140, 180, and 220 in 4 (experiment 2), and randomly used mAs between 60 and 220 in 3 (experiment 3). The lengths of the artifacts emanating from the anterior and posterior tips of the screw were used for the degree of artifact. Results: In experiment 1, the mA did not significantly affect the metal artifacts (P > 0.05); but the kVp did (P < 0.05). In experiment 2, the mA and kVp did not significantly affect the metal artifact degree (P > 0.05). In experiment 3, the mA did not affect the metal artifacts, but the kVp caused changes in metal artifact degrees (simple quantitative analysis). Conclusions: The proper parameters for the simultaneous reduction in the artifact and radiation dose are suggested to be tube voltages from 100 to 120 kVp and tube currents lower than the generally used values of 200 to 220 mA.

[1]  G. Wang,et al.  Low-contrast resolution in volumetric x-ray CT--analytical comparison between conventional and spiral CT. , 1997, Medical physics.

[2]  W A Kalender,et al.  Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements. , 1999, Medical physics.

[3]  J. Mayo,et al.  Radiation exposure at chest CT: a statement of the Fleischner Society. , 2003, Radiology.

[4]  K Engelke,et al.  CT of metal implants: reduction of artifacts using an extended CT scale technique. , 2000, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  E. Fishman,et al.  Metallic hip implants: CT with multiplanar reconstruction. , 1986, Radiology.

[6]  E. Fishman,et al.  Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[8]  W A Kalender,et al.  Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. I. Simulation studies. , 1999, Medical physics.

[9]  Axel Stäbler,et al.  Dose Reduction in Multislice Computed Tomography , 2005, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  M. Kalra,et al.  Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. , 2004, Radiology.

[11]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  A new algorithm for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo evaluation after total hip replacement. , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[12]  S. Young,et al.  Computed tomography: beam hardening and environmental density artifact. , 1983, Radiology.

[13]  K Freeman,et al.  CT scans through metal scanning technique versus hardware composition. , 1994, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[14]  W. Kalender,et al.  Reduction of CT artifacts caused by metallic implants. , 1987 .

[15]  M D Phillips,et al.  Multisection CT: scanning techniques and clinical applications. , 2000, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[16]  J. B. Kowalski,et al.  Surgical ligation clip artifacts on CT scans. , 1985, Radiology.

[17]  OPTIMAL CT SETTINGS FOR THE EVALUATION OF PERIMENOPAUSAL BONE LOSS , 1985 .

[18]  A. Delman,et al.  Computed tomography of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures that have been treated with Harrington instrumentation. , 1984, Radiology.

[19]  Mehran Yazdi,et al.  An adaptive approach to metal artifact reduction in helical computed tomography for radiation therapy treatment planning: experimental and clinical studies. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  General principles of MDCT. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[21]  R Poss,et al.  Enhanced computed tomographic techniques for the evaluation of total hip arthroplasty. , 1989, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Metallic prosthesis: technique to avoid increase in CT radiation dose with automatic tube current modulation in a phantom and patients. , 2005, Radiology.

[23]  E. Fishman,et al.  Evaluation of CT techniques for reducing artifacts in the presence of metallic orthopedic implants. , 1988, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[24]  Donald P Frush,et al.  Pediatric multidetector body CT. , 2003, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[25]  J L Weese,et al.  Avoidance of artifacts on computerized tomograms by selection of appropriate surgical clips. , 1984, American journal of surgery.

[26]  James H Thrall,et al.  Multi-detector row CT: radiation dose characteristics. , 2003, Radiology.

[27]  Kevin S Berbaum,et al.  Orthopedic hardware complications diagnosed with multi-detector row CT. , 2005, Radiology.